These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

848 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22830679)

  • 1. On the accuracy of explicitly correlated coupled-cluster interaction energies--have orbital results been beaten yet?
    Patkowski K
    J Chem Phys; 2012 Jul; 137(3):034103. PubMed ID: 22830679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Extrapolating MP2 and CCSD explicitly correlated correlation energies to the complete basis set limit with first and second row correlation consistent basis sets.
    Hill JG; Peterson KA; Knizia G; Werner HJ
    J Chem Phys; 2009 Nov; 131(19):194105. PubMed ID: 19929044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Basis set converged weak interaction energies from conventional and explicitly correlated coupled-cluster approach.
    Patkowski K
    J Chem Phys; 2013 Apr; 138(15):154101. PubMed ID: 23614406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Explicit correlation and basis set superposition error: the structure and energy of carbon dioxide dimer.
    McMahon JD; Lane JR
    J Chem Phys; 2011 Oct; 135(15):154309. PubMed ID: 22029315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Correlation consistent basis sets for explicitly correlated wavefunctions: valence and core-valence basis sets for Li, Be, Na, and Mg.
    Hill JG; Peterson KA
    Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2010 Sep; 12(35):10460-8. PubMed ID: 20603665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Improving "Silver-Standard" Benchmark Interaction Energies with Bond Functions.
    Dutta NN; Patkowski K
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2018 Jun; 14(6):3053-3070. PubMed ID: 29772176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Explicitly correlated coupled-cluster theory using cusp conditions. I. Perturbation analysis of coupled-cluster singles and doubles (CCSD-F12).
    Köhn A; Tew DP
    J Chem Phys; 2010 Nov; 133(17):174117. PubMed ID: 21054016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Toward a W4-F12 approach: Can explicitly correlated and orbital-based ab initio CCSD(T) limits be reconciled?
    Sylvetsky N; Peterson KA; Karton A; Martin JM
    J Chem Phys; 2016 Jun; 144(21):214101. PubMed ID: 27276939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Correlation consistent basis sets for molecular core-valence effects with explicitly correlated wave functions: the atoms B-Ne and Al-Ar.
    Hill JG; Mazumder S; Peterson KA
    J Chem Phys; 2010 Feb; 132(5):054108. PubMed ID: 20136306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Estimated MP2 and CCSD(T) interaction energies of n-alkane dimers at the basis set limit: comparison of the methods of Helgaker et al. and Feller.
    Tsuzuki S; Honda K; Uchimaru T; Mikami M
    J Chem Phys; 2006 Mar; 124(11):114304. PubMed ID: 16555885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Approximations to complete basis set-extrapolated, highly correlated non-covalent interaction energies.
    Mackie ID; DiLabio GA
    J Chem Phys; 2011 Oct; 135(13):134318. PubMed ID: 21992316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Simple coupled-cluster singles and doubles method with perturbative inclusion of triples and explicitly correlated geminals: The CCSD(T)R12 model.
    Valeev EF; Daniel Crawford T
    J Chem Phys; 2008 Jun; 128(24):244113. PubMed ID: 18601323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Basis set convergence of the coupled-cluster correction, δ(MP2)(CCSD(T)): best practices for benchmarking non-covalent interactions and the attendant revision of the S22, NBC10, HBC6, and HSG databases.
    Marshall MS; Burns LA; Sherrill CD
    J Chem Phys; 2011 Nov; 135(19):194102. PubMed ID: 22112061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Explicitly correlated combined coupled-cluster and perturbation methods.
    Shiozaki T; Valeev EF; Hirata S
    J Chem Phys; 2009 Jul; 131(4):044118. PubMed ID: 19655848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Benchmark theoretical study of the π-π binding energy in the benzene dimer.
    Miliordos E; Aprà E; Xantheas SS
    J Phys Chem A; 2014 Sep; 118(35):7568-78. PubMed ID: 24761749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Accurate calculations of intermolecular interaction energies using explicitly correlated wave functions.
    Marchetti O; Werner HJ
    Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2008 Jun; 10(23):3400-9. PubMed ID: 18535723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Explicit correlation and intermolecular interactions: investigating carbon dioxide complexes with the CCSD(T)-F12 method.
    de Lange KM; Lane JR
    J Chem Phys; 2011 Jan; 134(3):034301. PubMed ID: 21261347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of Explicitly Correlated Methods for Computing High-Accuracy Benchmark Energies for Noncovalent Interactions.
    Sirianni DA; Burns LA; Sherrill CD
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2017 Jan; 13(1):86-99. PubMed ID: 28068770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Generalized Energy-Based Fragmentation CCSD(T)-F12a Method and Application to the Relative Energies of Water Clusters (H2O)20.
    Wang K; Li W; Li S
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2014 Apr; 10(4):1546-53. PubMed ID: 26580368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Basis set dependence of higher-order correlation effects in π-type interactions.
    Carrell EJ; Thorne CM; Tschumper GS
    J Chem Phys; 2012 Jan; 136(1):014103. PubMed ID: 22239765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 43.