These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

787 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22830744)

  • 1. Towards task-based assessment of CT performance: system and object MTF across different reconstruction algorithms.
    Richard S; Husarik DB; Yadava G; Murphy SN; Samei E
    Med Phys; 2012 Jul; 39(7):4115-22. PubMed ID: 22830744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assessment of the dose reduction potential of a model-based iterative reconstruction algorithm using a task-based performance metrology.
    Samei E; Richard S
    Med Phys; 2015 Jan; 42(1):314-23. PubMed ID: 25563271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Performance evaluation of iterative reconstruction algorithms for achieving CT radiation dose reduction - a phantom study.
    Dodge CT; Tamm EP; Cody DD; Liu X; Jensen CT; Wei W; Kundra V; Rong XJ
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Mar; 17(2):511-531. PubMed ID: 27074454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessment of a model-based, iterative reconstruction algorithm (MBIR) regarding image quality and dose reduction in liver computed tomography.
    Chang W; Lee JM; Lee K; Yoon JH; Yu MH; Han JK; Choi BI
    Invest Radiol; 2013 Aug; 48(8):598-606. PubMed ID: 23511193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Filtered back projection, adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction, and a model-based iterative reconstruction in abdominal CT: an experimental clinical study.
    Deák Z; Grimm JM; Treitl M; Geyer LL; Linsenmaier U; Körner M; Reiser MF; Wirth S
    Radiology; 2013 Jan; 266(1):197-206. PubMed ID: 23169793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Update on the non-prewhitening model observer in computed tomography for the assessment of the adaptive statistical and model-based iterative reconstruction algorithms.
    Ott JG; Becce F; Monnin P; Schmidt S; Bochud FO; Verdun FR
    Phys Med Biol; 2014 Aug; 59(15):4047-64. PubMed ID: 24990844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Initial phantom study comparing image quality in computed tomography using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction and new adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction v.
    Lim K; Kwon H; Cho J; Oh J; Yoon S; Kang M; Ha D; Lee J; Kang E
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2015; 39(3):443-8. PubMed ID: 25654782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. CT Dose Reduction for Visceral Adipose Tissue Measurement: Effects of Model-Based and Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstructions and Filtered Back Projection.
    Yamada Y; Jinzaki M; Niijima Y; Hashimoto M; Yamada M; Abe T; Kuribayashi S
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Jun; 204(6):W677-83. PubMed ID: 26001256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Image comparative assessment using iterative reconstructions: clinical comparison of low-dose abdominal/pelvic computed tomography between adaptive statistical, model-based iterative reconstructions and traditional filtered back projection in 65 patients.
    Vardhanabhuti V; Riordan RD; Mitchell GR; Hyde C; Roobottom CA
    Invest Radiol; 2014 Apr; 49(4):209-16. PubMed ID: 24368613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of pure and hybrid iterative reconstruction techniques with conventional filtered back projection: image quality assessment in the cervicothoracic region.
    Katsura M; Sato J; Akahane M; Matsuda I; Ishida M; Yasaka K; Kunimatsu A; Ohtomo K
    Eur J Radiol; 2013 Feb; 82(2):356-60. PubMed ID: 23199752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Model-based iterative reconstruction compared to adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction and filtered back-projection in CT of the kidneys and the adjacent retroperitoneum.
    Olcott EW; Shin LK; Sommer G; Chan I; Rosenberg J; Molvin FL; Boas FE; Fleischmann D
    Acad Radiol; 2014 Jun; 21(6):774-84. PubMed ID: 24809318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. CT head-scan dosimetry in an anthropomorphic phantom and associated measurement of ACR accreditation-phantom imaging metrics under clinically representative scan conditions.
    Brunner CC; Stern SH; Minniti R; Parry MI; Skopec M; Chakrabarti K
    Med Phys; 2013 Aug; 40(8):081917. PubMed ID: 23927331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. CT of the chest with model-based, fully iterative reconstruction: comparison with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction.
    Ichikawa Y; Kitagawa K; Nagasawa N; Murashima S; Sakuma H
    BMC Med Imaging; 2013 Aug; 13():27. PubMed ID: 23927627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Volumetric quantification of lung nodules in CT with iterative reconstruction (ASiR and MBIR).
    Chen B; Barnhart H; Richard S; Robins M; Colsher J; Samei E
    Med Phys; 2013 Nov; 40(11):111902. PubMed ID: 24320435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Vascular diameter measurement in CT angiography: comparison of model-based iterative reconstruction and standard filtered back projection algorithms in vitro.
    Suzuki S; Machida H; Tanaka I; Ueno E
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Mar; 200(3):652-7. PubMed ID: 23436858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of pure and hybrid iterative reconstruction algorithms on high-resolution computed tomography in the evaluation of interstitial lung disease.
    Katsura M; Sato J; Akahane M; Mise Y; Sumida K; Abe O
    Eur J Radiol; 2017 Aug; 93():243-251. PubMed ID: 28668422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of hybrid and pure iterative reconstruction techniques with conventional filtered back projection: dose reduction potential in the abdomen.
    Singh S; Kalra MK; Do S; Thibault JB; Pien H; O'Connor OJ; Blake MA
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2012; 36(3):347-53. PubMed ID: 22592622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A qualitative and quantitative analysis of radiation dose and image quality of computed tomography images using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction.
    Hussain FA; Mail N; Shamy AM; Suliman A; Saoudi A
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 May; 17(3):419-432. PubMed ID: 27167261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Application of a full model-based iterative reconstruction (MBIR) in 80 kVp ultra-low-dose paranasal sinus CT imaging of pediatric patients.
    Sun J; Zhang Q; Duan X; Zhang C; Wang P; Jia C; Liu Y; Peng Y
    Radiol Med; 2018 Feb; 123(2):117-124. PubMed ID: 29019028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Image quality assessment of standard- and low-dose chest CT using filtered back projection, adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction, and novel model-based iterative reconstruction algorithms.
    Vardhanabhuti V; Loader RJ; Mitchell GR; Riordan RD; Roobottom CA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Mar; 200(3):545-52. PubMed ID: 23436843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 40.