132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22830748)
1. Evaluation of the potential utility of flat panel CT for quantifying relative contrast enhancement.
Jones AK; Mahvash A
Med Phys; 2012 Jul; 39(7):4149-54. PubMed ID: 22830748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Flat-panel CT arthrography: feasibility study and comparison to multidetector CT arthrography.
Guggenberger R; Fischer MA; Hodler J; Pfammatter T; Andreisek G
Invest Radiol; 2012 May; 47(5):312-8. PubMed ID: 22488509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. In vitro high-resolution flat-panel computed tomographic arthrography for artificial cartilage defect detection: comparison with multidetector computed tomography.
Guggenberger R; Winklhofer S; Spiczak JV; Andreisek G; Alkadhi H
Invest Radiol; 2013 Aug; 48(8):614-21. PubMed ID: 23538888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Accuracy of the CT numbers of simulated lung nodules imaged with multi-detector CT scanners.
Goodsitt MM; Chan HP; Way TW; Larson SC; Christodoulou EG; Kim J
Med Phys; 2006 Aug; 33(8):3006-17. PubMed ID: 16964879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Experimental realization of fluence field modulated CT using digital beam attenuation.
Szczykutowicz TP; Mistretta CA
Phys Med Biol; 2014 Mar; 59(5):1305-26. PubMed ID: 24556823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of radiation dose and image quality between flat panel computed tomography and multidetector computed tomography in a hybrid CT-angiography suite.
Jones AK; Odisio BC
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2020 Feb; 21(2):121-127. PubMed ID: 31922349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparing the image quality of a mobile flat-panel computed tomography and a multidetector computed tomography: a phantom study.
Neubauer J; Voigt JM; Lang H; Scheuer C; Goerke SM; Langer M; Fiebich M; Kotter E
Invest Radiol; 2014 Jul; 49(7):491-7. PubMed ID: 24637586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. C-arm flat-panel CT arthrography of the wrist and elbow: first experiences in human cadavers.
Guggenberger R; Morsbach F; Alkadhi H; Vich M; Pfammatter T; Hodler J; Andreisek G
Skeletal Radiol; 2013 Mar; 42(3):419-29. PubMed ID: 22926680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Feasibility of single-source dual-energy computed tomography for urinary stone characterization and value of iterative reconstructions.
Morsbach F; Wurnig MC; Müller D; Krauss B; Korporaal JG; Alkadhi H
Invest Radiol; 2014 Mar; 49(3):125-30. PubMed ID: 24141741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A strategy to decrease partial scan reconstruction artifacts in myocardial perfusion CT: phantom and in vivo evaluation.
Ramirez-Giraldo JC; Yu L; Kantor B; Ritman EL; McCollough CH
Med Phys; 2012 Jan; 39(1):214-23. PubMed ID: 22225290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. An alternate line erasure and readout (ALER) method for implementing slot-scan imaging technique with a flat-panel detector--initial experiences.
Liu X; Shaw CC; Altunbas MC; Wang T
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2006 Apr; 25(4):496-502. PubMed ID: 16608064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Usefulness of cone-beam volume CT with flat panel detectors in conjunction with catheter angiography for transcatheter arterial embolization.
Kakeda S; Korogi Y; Ohnari N; Moriya J; Oda N; Nishino K; Miyamoto W
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2007 Dec; 18(12):1508-16. PubMed ID: 18057285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The influence of antiscatter grids on soft-tissue detectability in cone-beam computed tomography with flat-panel detectors.
Siewerdsen JH; Moseley DJ; Bakhtiar B; Richard S; Jaffray DA
Med Phys; 2004 Dec; 31(12):3506-20. PubMed ID: 15651634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Spatial resolution improvement and dose reduction potential for inner ear CT imaging using a z-axis deconvolution technique.
McCollough CH; Leng S; Sunnegardh J; Vrieze TJ; Yu L; Lane J; Raupach R; Stierstorfer K; Flohr T
Med Phys; 2013 Jun; 40(6):061904. PubMed ID: 23718595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A method for determining the modulation transfer function from thick microwire profiles measured with x-ray microcomputed tomography.
Nakaya Y; Kawata Y; Niki N; Umetatni K; Ohmatsu H; Moriyama N
Med Phys; 2012 Jul; 39(7):4347-64. PubMed ID: 22830768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Dosimetric impact of image artifact from a wide-bore CT scanner in radiotherapy treatment planning.
Wu V; Podgorsak MB; Tran TA; Malhotra HK; Wang IZ
Med Phys; 2011 Jul; 38(7):4451-63. PubMed ID: 21859046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Quantitative assessment of four-dimensional computed tomography image acquisition quality.
Starkschall G; Desai N; Balter P; Prado K; Luo D; Cody D; Pan T
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2007 Jun; 8(3):1-20. PubMed ID: 17712299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Flat-panel-detector-based volumetric CT: performance evaluation of imaging for skeletal structures of small animals in comparison to multislice CT.
Obenauer S; Dullin C; Alves F; Missbach-Guentner J; Grabbe E; Heuser M
Clin Imaging; 2007; 31(1):18-22. PubMed ID: 17189841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Flat panel detector-based cone beam computed tomography with a circle-plus-two-arcs data acquisition orbit: preliminary phantom study.
Ning R; Tang X; Conover D; Yu R
Med Phys; 2003 Jul; 30(7):1694-705. PubMed ID: 12906186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of organ doses and image quality between CT and flat panel XperCT scans in wrist and inner ear examinations.
Damet J; Sans-Merce M; Miéville F; Becker M; Poletti PA; Verdun FR; Baechler S
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010; 139(1-3):164-8. PubMed ID: 20200104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
