290 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22830777)
1. Biophysical modeling of brain tumor progression: from unconditionally stable explicit time integration to an inverse problem with parabolic PDE constraints for model calibration.
Mang A; Toma A; Schuetz TA; Becker S; Eckey T; Mohr C; Petersen D; Buzug TM
Med Phys; 2012 Jul; 39(7):4444-59. PubMed ID: 22830777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A generic framework for modeling brain deformation as a constrained parametric optimization problem to aid non-diffeomorphic image registration in brain tumor imaging.
Mang A; Toma A; Schuetz TA; Becker S; Buzug TM
Methods Inf Med; 2012; 51(5):429-40. PubMed ID: 23038648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Multiscale modeling for image analysis of brain tumor studies.
Bauer S; May C; Dionysiou D; Stamatakos G; Büchler P; Reyes M
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2012 Jan; 59(1):25-9. PubMed ID: 21813362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. An inverse problem formulation for parameter estimation of a reaction-diffusion model of low grade gliomas.
Gholami A; Mang A; Biros G
J Math Biol; 2016 Jan; 72(1-2):409-33. PubMed ID: 25963601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. An image-driven parameter estimation problem for a reaction-diffusion glioma growth model with mass effects.
Hogea C; Davatzikos C; Biros G
J Math Biol; 2008 Jun; 56(6):793-825. PubMed ID: 18026731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Brain glioma growth model using reaction-diffusion equation with viscous stress tensor on brain MR images.
Yuan J; Liu L
Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Feb; 34(2):114-9. PubMed ID: 26518060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Mathematical modeling of efficient protocols to control glioma growth.
Branco JR; Ferreira JA; de Oliveira P
Math Biosci; 2014 Sep; 255():83-90. PubMed ID: 25057777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. In-depth analysis and evaluation of diffusive glioma models.
Roniotis A; Sakkalis V; Karatzanis I; Zervakis ME; Marias K
IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed; 2012 May; 16(3):299-307. PubMed ID: 22287245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Assessment and statistical modeling of the relationship between remotely sensed aerosol optical depth and PM2.5 in the eastern United States.
Paciorek CJ; Liu Y;
Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2012 May; (167):5-83; discussion 85-91. PubMed ID: 22838153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Tumor invasion margin on the Riemannian space of brain fibers.
Mosayebi P; Cobzas D; Murtha A; Jagersand M
Med Image Anal; 2012 Feb; 16(2):361-73. PubMed ID: 22154876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Fast evolution of image manifolds and application to filtering and segmentation in 3D medical images.
Deschamps T; Malladi R; Ravve I
IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph; 2004; 10(5):525-35. PubMed ID: 15794135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. ODE/PDE analysis of corneal curvature.
Płociniczak L; Griffiths GW; Schiesser WE
Comput Biol Med; 2014 Oct; 53():30-41. PubMed ID: 25113914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Distributed Proportional-spatial Derivative control of nonlinear parabolic systems via fuzzy PDE modeling approach.
Wang JW; Wu HN; Li HX
IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern B Cybern; 2012 Jun; 42(3):927-38. PubMed ID: 22328181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Multiatlas Calibration of Biophysical Brain Tumor Growth Models with Mass Effect.
Subramanian S; Scheufele K; Himthani N; Biros G
Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2020 Oct; 12262():551-560. PubMed ID: 34704089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Extrapolating glioma invasion margin in brain magnetic resonance images: suggesting new irradiation margins.
Konukoglu E; Clatz O; Bondiau PY; Delingette H; Ayache N
Med Image Anal; 2010 Apr; 14(2):111-25. PubMed ID: 20042359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Coupling brain-tumor biophysical models and diffeomorphic image registration.
Scheufele K; Mang A; Gholami A; Davatzikos C; Biros G; Mehl M
Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng; 2019 Apr; 347():533-567. PubMed ID: 31857736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Mathematically modeling the biological properties of gliomas: A review.
Martirosyan NL; Rutter EM; Ramey WL; Kostelich EJ; Kuang Y; Preul MC
Math Biosci Eng; 2015 Aug; 12(4):879-905. PubMed ID: 25974347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Expert-validated CSF segmentation of MNI atlas enhances accuracy of virtual glioma growth patterns.
Amelot A; Stretton E; Delingette H; Ayache N; Froelich S; Mandonnet E
J Neurooncol; 2015 Jan; 121(2):381-7. PubMed ID: 25370706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Hybrid mathematical model of glioma progression.
Tanaka ML; Debinski W; Puri IK
Cell Prolif; 2009 Oct; 42(5):637-46. PubMed ID: 19624684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Modeling Brain Dynamics in Brain Tumor Patients Using the Virtual Brain.
Aerts H; Schirner M; Jeurissen B; Van Roost D; Achten E; Ritter P; Marinazzo D
eNeuro; 2018; 5(3):. PubMed ID: 29911173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
