These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

231 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22831561)

  • 41. On the use of hierarchical probabilistic models for characterizing and managing uncertainty in risk/safety assessment.
    Kodell RL; Chen JJ
    Risk Anal; 2007 Apr; 27(2):433-7. PubMed ID: 17511709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Sensitivity analysis and estimation of extreme tail behavior in two-dimensional Monte Carlo simulation.
    Roelofs VJ; Kennedy MC
    Risk Anal; 2011 Oct; 31(10):1597-609. PubMed ID: 21418084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. A novel generalized belief structure comprising unprecisiated uncertainty applied to aphasia diagnosis.
    Sabahi F
    J Biomed Inform; 2016 Aug; 62():66-77. PubMed ID: 27301542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Uncertainty in cost-effectiveness analysis. Probabilistic uncertainty analysis and stochastic league tables.
    Baltussen RM; Hutubessy RC; Evans DB; Murray CJ
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2002; 18(1):112-9. PubMed ID: 11987434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Using probability boxes to model elicited information: a case study.
    Roelofs VJ; Roelofs W
    Risk Anal; 2013 Sep; 33(9):1650-60. PubMed ID: 23231722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Uncertainty distribution associated with estimating a proportion in microbial risk assessment.
    Miconnet N; Cornu M; Beaufort A; Rosso L; Denis JB
    Risk Anal; 2005 Feb; 25(1):39-48. PubMed ID: 15787755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Handling input correlations in pharmacoeconomic models.
    Naveršnik K; Rojnik K
    Value Health; 2012 May; 15(3):540-9. PubMed ID: 22583465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Conundrums with uncertainty factors.
    Cooke R
    Risk Anal; 2010 Mar; 30(3):330-9. PubMed ID: 20030767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Extension of sensitivity and uncertainty analysis for long term dose assessment of high level nuclear waste disposal sites to uncertainties in the human behaviour.
    Albrecht A; Miquel S
    J Environ Radioact; 2010 Jan; 101(1):55-67. PubMed ID: 19758732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. A probabilistic effect assessment model for hazardous substances at the workplace.
    Schneider K; Schuhmacher-Wolz U; Hassauer M; Darschnik S; Elmshäuser E; Mosbach-Schulz O
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2006 Mar; 44(2):172-81. PubMed ID: 16356615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Estimating conditional probabilities of terrorist attacks: modeling adversaries with uncertain value tradeoffs.
    Levine ES
    Risk Anal; 2012 Feb; 32(2):294-303. PubMed ID: 21801187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Hypothesis testing, statistical power, and confidence limits in the presence of epistemic uncertainty.
    Hofer E
    Health Phys; 2007 Mar; 92(3):226-35. PubMed ID: 17293694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Need for speed: an efficient algorithm for calculation of single-parameter expected value of partial perfect information.
    Sadatsafavi M; Bansback N; Zafari Z; Najafzadeh M; Marra C
    Value Health; 2013; 16(2):438-48. PubMed ID: 23538197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Probabilistic risk analysis of building contamination.
    Bolster DT; Tartakovsky DM
    Indoor Air; 2008 Oct; 18(5):351-64. PubMed ID: 18681912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Sensitivity analysis of a two-dimensional quantitative microbiological risk assessment: keeping variability and uncertainty separated.
    Busschaert P; Geeraerd AH; Uyttendaele M; Van Impe JF
    Risk Anal; 2011 Aug; 31(8):1295-307. PubMed ID: 21418082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Quantifying and reducing uncertainty in life cycle assessment using the Bayesian Monte Carlo method.
    Lo SC; Ma HW; Lo SL
    Sci Total Environ; 2005 Mar; 340(1-3):23-33. PubMed ID: 15752490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Combining the cost of reducing uncertainty with the selection of risk assessment models for remediation decision of site contamination.
    Chen YC; Ma HW
    J Hazard Mater; 2007 Mar; 141(1):17-26. PubMed ID: 16926066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Modeling the imprecision in prospective dosimetry of internal exposure to uranium.
    Davesne E; Chojnacki E; Paquet F; Blanchardon E
    Health Phys; 2009 Feb; 96(2):144-54. PubMed ID: 19131736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Sources of uncertainty in pesticide fate modelling.
    Dubus IG; Brown CD; Beulke S
    Sci Total Environ; 2003 Dec; 317(1-3):53-72. PubMed ID: 14630412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Bayesian uncertainty quantification and propagation in molecular dynamics simulations: a high performance computing framework.
    Angelikopoulos P; Papadimitriou C; Koumoutsakos P
    J Chem Phys; 2012 Oct; 137(14):144103. PubMed ID: 23061835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.