These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2283186)

  • 1. The role of digital subtraction angiography in the quantitation of coronary stenosis.
    Katritsis D; Webb-Peploe MM
    Int J Cardiol; 1990 Dec; 29(3):277-83. PubMed ID: 2283186
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Patterns in visual interpretation of coronary arteriograms as detected by quantitative coronary arteriography.
    Fleming RM; Kirkeeide RL; Smalling RW; Gould KL
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1991 Oct; 18(4):945-51. PubMed ID: 1894868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Digital angiographic impulse response analysis of regional myocardial perfusion. Detection of autoregulatory changes in nonstenotic coronary arteries induced by collateral flow to adjacent stenotic arteries.
    Schühlen H; Eigler NL; Whiting JS
    Circulation; 1994 Mar; 89(3):1004-12. PubMed ID: 8124785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of coronary stenosis quantitation results from on-line digital and digitized cine film images.
    Skelton TN; Kisslo KB; Bashore TM
    Am J Cardiol; 1988 Sep; 62(7):381-6. PubMed ID: 3046284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Accuracy and reliability of quantitative measurement of coronary arterial stenosis by videodensitometry on coronary angiogram.
    Akishita M; Ouchi Y; Kozaki K; Orimo A; Hattori A; Orimo H
    Jpn Heart J; 1992 Sep; 33(5):631-41. PubMed ID: 1289595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Digital coronary angiography: the new gold standard?
    Hartnell G; Wilde P
    Br Heart J; 1991 Sep; 66(3):196-8. PubMed ID: 1931345
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A "significant" stenosis: thirty years on.
    Raphael MJ; Donaldson RM
    Lancet; 1989 Jan; 1(8631):207-9. PubMed ID: 2563108
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Quantitative analysis in the evaluation of coronary stenosis].
    Cequier A; Sabaté M; Gómez-Hospital JA; Mauri J; Sala J; Jara F; Esplugas E
    Rev Esp Cardiol; 1994; 47 Suppl 4():140-6. PubMed ID: 7863080
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Coronary arteriographic analysis and angiographic morphology.
    Ambrose JA
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1989 Jun; 13(7):1492-4. PubMed ID: 2723264
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Bilateral coronary ostial stenosis associated with aortitis syndrome.
    Ogino K; Tokuyasu Y; Motomiya T; Sugiura M; Endo M
    Chest; 1991 May; 99(5):1286-7. PubMed ID: 2019197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Compression of digital coronary angiograms does not affect visual or quantitative assessment of coronary artery stenosis severity.
    Rigolin VH; Robiolio PA; Spero LA; Harrawood BP; Morris KG; Fortin DF; Baker WA; Bashore TM; Cusma JT
    Am J Cardiol; 1996 Jul; 78(2):131-5. PubMed ID: 8712131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Variation in measurement of coronary lesions on 35 and 70 mm angiograms.
    Myers MG; Shulman HS; Saibil EA; Naqvi SZ
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1978 May; 130(5):913-15. PubMed ID: 417590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Clinical use of lossy image compression in digital angiography.
    Elion JL; Whiting JS
    Am J Cardiol; 1996 Jul; 78(2):219-20. PubMed ID: 8712147
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The future of digital angiography.
    Tobis JM
    Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1992 Sep; 27(1):14-5. PubMed ID: 1525804
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Venous digital subtraction angiography of the left ventricle in comparison with conventional angiography].
    Rother T; Neugebauer A; Duck HJ; Krosse B
    Z Gesamte Inn Med; 1990 Mar; 45(5):133-7. PubMed ID: 2356627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Digital radiography with dual-energy subtraction: improved evaluation of cardiac calcification.
    Gilkeson RC; Novak RD; Sachs P
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2004 Nov; 183(5):1233-8. PubMed ID: 15505283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessment of the functional significance of coronary stenoses. Is digital angiography the answer?
    Nissen SE; Gurley JC
    Circulation; 1990 Apr; 81(4):1431-5. PubMed ID: 2180595
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Role of coronary arteriography in the evaluation of patients with coronary artery disease.
    Selzer A; Pasternak RC
    Am J Med; 1981 Apr; 70(4):747-51. PubMed ID: 7211909
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Digital subtraction angiography for the assessment of myocardial perfusion].
    Felder LM; Hess OM; Vassalli F; Jiang Z; Grimm J; Krayenbühl HP
    Schweiz Rundsch Med Prax; 1992 Oct; 81(43):1277-80. PubMed ID: 1411017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Isolated coronary ostial stenosis in elderly patients: correction by directional coronary atherectomy.
    Challappa K; Feld H; Berman K; Shani J
    Am Heart J; 1992 Sep; 124(3):775-7. PubMed ID: 1514506
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.