These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22832179)

  • 1. How framing statistical statements affects subjective veracity: validation and application of a multinomial model for judgments of truth.
    Hilbig BE
    Cognition; 2012 Oct; 125(1):37-48. PubMed ID: 22832179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Good things don't come easy (to mind): explaining framing effects in judgments of truth.
    Hilbig BE
    Exp Psychol; 2012; 59(1):38-46. PubMed ID: 21768064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evidence for a neural correlate of a framing effect: bias-specific activity in the ventromedial prefrontal cortex during credibility judgments.
    Deppe M; Schwindt W; Krämer J; Kugel H; Plassmann H; Kenning P; Ringelstein EB
    Brain Res Bull; 2005 Nov; 67(5):413-21. PubMed ID: 16216688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Modeling unconscious gender bias in fame judgments: finding the proper branch of the correct (multinomial) tree.
    Draine SC; Greenwald AG; Banaji MR
    Conscious Cogn; 1996; 5(1-2):221-5. PubMed ID: 8733932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Adult's veracity judgments of Black and White children's statements: the role of perceiver and target race and prejudice-related concerns.
    Zanette S; Hagi Hussein S; Malloy LC
    Front Psychol; 2023; 14():1177253. PubMed ID: 37564322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessing the belief bias effect with ROCs: it's a response bias effect.
    Dube C; Rotello CM; Heit E
    Psychol Rev; 2010 Jul; 117(3):831-63. PubMed ID: 20658855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A quantum theoretical explanation for probability judgment errors.
    Busemeyer JR; Pothos EM; Franco R; Trueblood JS
    Psychol Rev; 2011 Apr; 118(2):193-218. PubMed ID: 21480739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Brain potentials associated with the outcome processing in framing effects.
    Ma Q; Feng Y; Xu Q; Bian J; Tang H
    Neurosci Lett; 2012 Oct; 528(2):110-3. PubMed ID: 22995179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Truth from language and truth from fit: the impact of linguistic concreteness and level of construal on subjective truth.
    Hansen J; Wänke M
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2010 Nov; 36(11):1576-88. PubMed ID: 20947772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Heuristic versus systematic processing of information in detecting deception: questioning the truth bias.
    Masip J; Garrido E; Herrero C
    Psychol Rep; 2009 Aug; 105(1):11-36. PubMed ID: 19810430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Facial appearance and judgments of credibility: the effects of facial babyishness and age on statement credibility.
    Masip J; Garrido E; Herrero C
    Genet Soc Gen Psychol Monogr; 2003 Aug; 129(3):269-311. PubMed ID: 15134128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Negative Is True Here and Now, But Not So Much There and Then.
    Jaffé ME; Greifeneder R
    Exp Psychol; 2020 Sep; 67(5):314-326. PubMed ID: 33167821
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. How explicit warnings reduce the truth effect: A multinomial modeling approach.
    Calio F; Nadarevic L; Musch J
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2020 Nov; 211():103185. PubMed ID: 33130489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The truth and bias model of judgment.
    West TV; Kenny DA
    Psychol Rev; 2011 Apr; 118(2):357-78. PubMed ID: 21480740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Unconscious gender bias in fame judgments?
    Buchner A; Wippich W
    Conscious Cogn; 1996; 5(1-2):197-220. PubMed ID: 8733931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reversing the truth effect: learning the interpretation of processing fluency in judgments of truth.
    Unkelbach C
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Jan; 33(1):219-30. PubMed ID: 17201563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The interplay of memory and judgment processes in effects of aging on hindsight bias.
    Bayen UJ; Erdfelder E; Bearden JN; Lozito JP
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Sep; 32(5):1003-18. PubMed ID: 16938042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A multinomial modeling approach to dissociate different components of the truth effect.
    Unkelbach C; Stahl C
    Conscious Cogn; 2009 Mar; 18(1):22-38. PubMed ID: 18980847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Hindsight bias: how knowledge and heuristics affect our reconstruction of the past.
    Hertwig R; Fanselow C; Hoffrage U
    Memory; 2003; 11(4-5):357-77. PubMed ID: 14562868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of perceptual fluency on judgments of truth.
    Reber R; Schwarz N
    Conscious Cogn; 1999 Sep; 8(3):338-42. PubMed ID: 10487787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.