These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22832395)
1. Incomplete healing of the uterine incision after cesarean section: is it preventable by intraoperative digital dilatation of the internal cervical ostium? Yazicioglu HF; Sevket O; Ekin M; Ozyurt O; Aygun M Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2012; 74(2):131-5. PubMed ID: 22832395 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Position and integrity of uterine scar are determined by degree of cervical dilatation at time of Cesarean section. Kamel R; Eissa T; Sharaf M; Negm S; Thilaganathan B Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Mar; 57(3):466-470. PubMed ID: 32330331 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Incomplete healing of the uterine incision after caesarean section: Is it preventable? Yazicioglu F; Gökdogan A; Kelekci S; Aygün M; Savan K Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2006 Jan; 124(1):32-6. PubMed ID: 16023780 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Standardized ultrasonographic approach for the assessment of risk factors of incomplete healing of the cesarean section scar in the uterus. Pomorski M; Fuchs T; Rosner-Tenerowicz A; Zimmer M Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 Oct; 205():141-5. PubMed ID: 27591715 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Morphology of the cesarean section scar in the non-pregnant uterus after one elective cesarean section. Pomorski M; Fuchs T; Rosner-Tenerowicz A; Zimmer M Ginekol Pol; 2017; 88(4):174-179. PubMed ID: 28509317 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Hydrosonographic assessment of the effects of 2 different suturing techniques on healing of the uterine scar after cesarean delivery. Sevket O; Ates S; Molla T; Ozkal F; Uysal O; Dansuk R Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2014 Jun; 125(3):219-22. PubMed ID: 24680843 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Hysterotomy level at Cesarean section and occurrence of large scar defects: a randomized single-blind trial. Vikhareva O; Rickle GS; Lavesson T; Nedopekina E; Brandell K; Salvesen KÅ Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Apr; 53(4):438-442. PubMed ID: 30484920 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Incomplete healing of the uterine incision after elective second cesarean section. Tekelioğlu M; Karataş S; Güralp O; Murat Alınca C; Ender Yumru A; Tuğ N J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2021 Mar; 34(6):943-947. PubMed ID: 31146610 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Sonographic imaging of cervical scars after Cesarean section. Zimmer EZ; Bardin R; Tamir A; Bronshtein M Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Jun; 23(6):594-8. PubMed ID: 15170802 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Ultrasound evaluation of the uterine scar after cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial of one- and two-layer closure. Hamar BD; Saber SB; Cackovic M; Magloire LK; Pettker CM; Abdel-Razeq SS; Rosenberg VA; Buhimschi IA; Buhimschi CS Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Oct; 110(4):808-13. PubMed ID: 17906013 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Risk factors for incomplete healing of the uterine incision after caesarean section. Vikhareva Osser O; Valentin L BJOG; 2010 Aug; 117(9):1119-26. PubMed ID: 20604776 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Routine cervical dilatation during elective caesarean section. Should we continue? Ezegwui HU; Ogbuefi FC J Obstet Gynaecol; 2015 Feb; 35(2):150-2. PubMed ID: 25057991 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Ultrasonographic and hysteroscopic outcomes of uterine scar healing after cesarean section: comparison of two types of single-layer suture. Ceci O; Cantatore C; Scioscia M; Nardelli C; Ravi M; Vimercati A; Bettocchi S J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2012 Nov; 38(11):1302-7. PubMed ID: 22612785 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Impact of uterine closure on residual myometrial thickness after cesarean: a randomized controlled trial. Roberge S; Demers S; Girard M; Vikhareva O; Markey S; Chaillet N; Moore L; Paris G; Bujold E Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Apr; 214(4):507.e1-507.e6. PubMed ID: 26522861 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Hydrosonographic Assessment of the Effect of Two Different Suture Materials on Healing of the Uterine Scar after Cesarean Delivery: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial. Sevket O; Takmaz T; Ozcan P; Halici BNA; Islek SH Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol; 2021 Apr; 225(2):140-145. PubMed ID: 32588418 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Routine cervical dilatation during elective cesarean delivery - Is it really necessary? Koifman A; Harlev A; Sheiner E; Press F; Wiznitzer A J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2009 Jul; 22(7):608-11. PubMed ID: 19350445 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Risk factors for incomplete healing of the uterine incision after cesarean section. Chen Y; Han P; Wang YJ; Li YX Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2017 Aug; 296(2):355-361. PubMed ID: 28589479 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. High prevalence of defects in Cesarean section scars at transvaginal ultrasound examination. Osser OV; Jokubkiene L; Valentin L Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Jul; 34(1):90-7. PubMed ID: 19499514 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Routine cervical dilatation during elective cesarean section and its influence on maternal morbidity: a randomized controlled study. Ahmed B; Abu Nahia F; Abushama M J Perinat Med; 2005; 33(6):510-3. PubMed ID: 16318613 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]