These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22833341)
21. Fluent conceptual processing and explicit memory for faces are electrophysiologically distinct. Voss JL; Paller KA J Neurosci; 2006 Jan; 26(3):926-33. PubMed ID: 16421312 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Unitization does not impede overall item recognition performance: Behavioral and event-related potential study. Liu Z; Wu J; Wang Y; Guo C Neurobiol Learn Mem; 2020 Jan; 167():107130. PubMed ID: 31786310 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Familiarity and priming are mediated by overlapping neural substrates. Thakral PP; Kensinger EA; Slotnick SD Brain Res; 2016 Feb; 1632():107-18. PubMed ID: 26683080 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Investigating the relationship between implicit and explicit memory: Evidence that masked repetition priming speeds the onset of recollection. Park JL; Donaldson DI Neuroimage; 2016 Oct; 139():8-16. PubMed ID: 27291494 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Memory variability is due to the contribution of recollection and familiarity, not to encoding variability. Koen JD; Yonelinas AP J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Nov; 36(6):1536-42. PubMed ID: 20854009 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Recognition memory: opposite effects of hippocampal damage on recollection and familiarity. Sauvage MM; Fortin NJ; Owens CB; Yonelinas AP; Eichenbaum H Nat Neurosci; 2008 Jan; 11(1):16-8. PubMed ID: 18037884 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Changes in familiarity and recollection across the lifespan: an ERP perspective. Friedman D; de Chastelaine M; Nessler D; Malcolm B Brain Res; 2010 Jan; 1310():124-41. PubMed ID: 19914220 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Event-related potentials associated with masked priming of test cues reveal multiple potential contributions to recognition memory. Woollams AM; Taylor JR; Karayanidis F; Henson RN J Cogn Neurosci; 2008 Jun; 20(6):1114-29. PubMed ID: 18211248 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Effect of frontal lobe lesions on the recollection and familiarity components of recognition memory. MacPherson SE; Bozzali M; Cipolotti L; Dolan RJ; Rees JH; Shallice T Neuropsychologia; 2008 Nov; 46(13):3124-32. PubMed ID: 18675284 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Impaired capacity for familiarity after hippocampal damage. Song Z; Wixted JT; Hopkins RO; Squire LR Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2011 Jun; 108(23):9655-60. PubMed ID: 21606344 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The effects of unitization on the contribution of familiarity and recollection processes to associative recognition memory: evidence from event-related potentials. Zheng Z; Li J; Xiao F; Broster LS; Jiang Y; Xi M Int J Psychophysiol; 2015 Mar; 95(3):355-62. PubMed ID: 25583573 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The effect of intrinsic image memorability on recollection and familiarity. Broers N; Busch NA Mem Cognit; 2021 Jul; 49(5):998-1018. PubMed ID: 33230724 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Assessing recollection and familiarity of similar lures in a behavioral pattern separation task. Kim J; Yassa MA Hippocampus; 2013 Apr; 23(4):287-94. PubMed ID: 23401187 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Independent recollection-familiarity ratings: Similar effects of levels-of-processing whether amount or confidence is rated. Williams HL; Bodner GE Can J Exp Psychol; 2019 Jun; 73(2):94-99. PubMed ID: 30802078 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]