These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22833695)
1. Some Memories are Odder than Others: Judgments of Episodic Oddity Violate Known Decision Rules. O'Connor AR; Guhl EN; Cox JC; Dobbins IG J Mem Lang; 2011 May; 64(4):299-315. PubMed ID: 22833695 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Recognition memory ROCs for item and associative information: the contribution of recollection and familiarity. Yonelinas AP Mem Cognit; 1997 Nov; 25(6):747-63. PubMed ID: 9421560 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The contribution of recollection and familiarity to recognition and source-memory judgments: a formal dual-process model and an analysis of receiver operating characteristics. Yonelinas AP J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1999 Nov; 25(6):1415-34. PubMed ID: 10605829 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Conceptual knowledge modulates memory recognition of common items: The selective role of item-typicality. Souza C; Garrido MV; Horchak OV; Carmo JC Mem Cognit; 2022 Jan; 50(1):77-94. PubMed ID: 34363197 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evidence for the contribution of a threshold retrieval process to semantic memory. Kempnich M; Urquhart JA; O'Connor AR; Moulin CJ Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Oct; 70(10):2026-2047. PubMed ID: 27494145 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Recognition memory for source and occurrence: the importance of recollection. Quamme JR; Frederick C; Kroll NE; Yonelinas AP; Dobbins IG Mem Cognit; 2002 Sep; 30(6):893-907. PubMed ID: 12450093 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Some-or-none recollection: Evidence from item and source memory. Onyper SV; Zhang YX; Howard MW J Exp Psychol Gen; 2010 May; 139(2):341-64. PubMed ID: 20438255 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Preference gives more consistent judgments than oddity only if the task can be modeled as forced choice. Geelhoed EN; MacRae AW; Ennis DM Percept Psychophys; 1994 Apr; 55(4):473-7. PubMed ID: 8036126 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A continuous dual-process model of remember/know judgments. Wixted JT; Mickes L Psychol Rev; 2010 Oct; 117(4):1025-54. PubMed ID: 20836613 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Slow judgments of learning predict familiarity-based memories as measured by the remember-know task. Jang Y J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2022 Nov; 48(11):1618-1637. PubMed ID: 34516209 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Critical tests of the continuous dual-process model of recognition. Cha J; Dobbins IG Cognition; 2021 Oct; 215():104827. PubMed ID: 34229131 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Recollection can be weak and familiarity can be strong. Ingram KM; Mickes L; Wixted JT J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 Mar; 38(2):325-39. PubMed ID: 21967320 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Examining ERP correlates of recognition memory: evidence of accurate source recognition without recollection. Addante RJ; Ranganath C; Yonelinas AP Neuroimage; 2012 Aug; 62(1):439-50. PubMed ID: 22548808 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Judgments of learning reflect the encoding of contexts, not items: evidence from a test of recognition exclusion. Ünal B; Benjamin AS Memory; 2024; 32(1):55-68. PubMed ID: 37976035 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Familiarity, recollection, and receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves in recognition memory. Juola JF; Caballero-Sanz A; Muñoz-García AR; Botella J; Suero M Mem Cognit; 2019 May; 47(4):855-876. PubMed ID: 30949925 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Contribution of familiarity and recollection to associative recognition memory: insights from event-related potentials. Opitz B; Cornell S J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Sep; 18(9):1595-605. PubMed ID: 16989559 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]