These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2283430)

  • 1. The influence of extraneous sounds on the perceptual estimation of first-formant frequency in vowels.
    Roberts B; Moore BC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Dec; 88(6):2571-83. PubMed ID: 2283430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Absence of effect of coherent frequency modulation on grouping a mistuned harmonic with a vowel.
    Darwin CJ; Sandell GJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1995 May; 97(5 Pt 1):3135-8. PubMed ID: 7759653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Mistuning a harmonic of a vowel: grouping and phase effects on vowel quality.
    Darwin CJ; Gardner RB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1986 Mar; 79(3):838-45. PubMed ID: 3958326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Perception of front vowels: the role of harmonics in the first formant region.
    Assmann PF; Nearey TM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1987 Feb; 81(2):520-34. PubMed ID: 3558970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The missing fundamental in vowel height perception.
    Fahey RP; Diehl RL
    Percept Psychophys; 1996 Jul; 58(5):725-33. PubMed ID: 8710451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Auditory-perceptual interpretation of the vowel.
    Miller JD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 May; 85(5):2114-34. PubMed ID: 2659639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The perception of back vowels: centre of gravity hypothesis.
    Assmann PF
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 1991 Aug; 43(3):423-48. PubMed ID: 1775650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Perception of vowel height: the role of F1-F0 distance.
    Hoemeke KA; Diehl RL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Aug; 96(2 Pt 1):661-74. PubMed ID: 7930066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Vowel formant discrimination for high-fidelity speech.
    Liu C; Kewley-Port D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Aug; 116(2):1224-33. PubMed ID: 15376687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Linear phoneme boundaries for German synthetic two-formant vowels.
    Hose B; Langner G; Scheich H
    Hear Res; 1983 Jan; 9(1):13-25. PubMed ID: 6219082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Difference limens for formant patterns of vowel sounds.
    Hawks JW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Feb; 95(2):1074-84. PubMed ID: 8132901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Formant-frequency matching between sounds with different bandwidths and on different fundamental frequencies.
    Dissard P; Darwin CJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Jul; 110(1):409-15. PubMed ID: 11508966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Formant pattern ambiguity of vowel sounds.
    Maurer D; D'Heureuse C; Landis T
    Int J Neurosci; 2000; 100(1-4):39-76. PubMed ID: 10512548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Perceptual differences between vowels located in a limited phonetic space.
    Kewley-Port D; Atal BS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Apr; 85(4):1726-40. PubMed ID: 2708689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Formant-frequency discrimination for isolated English vowels.
    Kewley-Port D; Watson CS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Jan; 95(1):485-96. PubMed ID: 8120259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Static, dynamic, and relational properties in vowel perception.
    Nearey TM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 May; 85(5):2088-113. PubMed ID: 2659638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Speech coding in the auditory nerve: I. Vowel-like sounds.
    Delgutte B; Kiang NY
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1984 Mar; 75(3):866-78. PubMed ID: 6707316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The representation of the spectra and fundamental frequencies of steady-state single- and double-vowel sounds in the temporal discharge patterns of guinea pig cochlear-nerve fibers.
    Palmer AR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Sep; 88(3):1412-26. PubMed ID: 2229676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The relative importance of spectral tilt in monophthongs and diphthongs.
    Kiefte M; Kluender KR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Mar; 117(3 Pt 1):1395-404. PubMed ID: 15807027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Acoustical-perceptual correlates of "whisper pitch" in synthetically generated vowels.
    Higashikawa M; Minifie FD
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 1999 Jun; 42(3):583-91. PubMed ID: 10391624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.