206 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22834464)
1. Attentional set protects visual marking from visual transients.
Osugi T; Kawahara JI
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(1):69-90. PubMed ID: 22834464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Brain structures involved in visual search in the presence and absence of color singletons.
Talsma D; Coe B; Munoz DP; Theeuwes J
J Cogn Neurosci; 2010 Apr; 22(4):761-74. PubMed ID: 19309291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Visual marking survives graphical change if meaning is retained.
Osugi T; Kumada T; Kawahara J
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Nov; 72(8):2144-56. PubMed ID: 21097858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Attentional capture decreases when distractors remain visible during rapid serial visual presentations.
Inukai T; Kumada T; Kawahara J
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 May; 72(4):939-50. PubMed ID: 20436191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Processing multidimensional objects under different perceptual loads: the priority of bottom-up perceptual saliency.
Wei P; Zhou X
Brain Res; 2006 Oct; 1114(1):113-24. PubMed ID: 16935270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Exploring the breadth of the top-down representations that control attentional disengagement.
Wright TJ; Boot WR; Jones JL
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2015; 68(5):993-1006. PubMed ID: 25295752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Redundancy gains in pop-out visual search are determined by top-down task set: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence.
Grubert A; Krummenacher J; Eimer M
J Vis; 2011 Dec; 11(14):. PubMed ID: 22159631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Inter-trial inhibition of attention to features is modulated by task relevance.
Levinthal BR; Lleras A
J Vis; 2008 Nov; 8(15):12.1-15. PubMed ID: 19146296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The spatial distribution of inhibition in preview search.
Osugi T; Kumada T; Kawahara J
Vision Res; 2009 Mar; 49(8):851-61. PubMed ID: 19275913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Visual marking and change blindness: moving occluders and transient masks neutralize shape changes to ignored objects.
Watson DG; Kunar MA
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Dec; 36(6):1391-405. PubMed ID: 20853998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Flexible feature-based inhibition in visual search mediates magnified impairments of selection: evidence from carry-over effects under dynamic preview-search conditions.
Andrews LS; Watson DG; Humphreys GW; Braithwaite JJ
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Aug; 37(4):1007-16. PubMed ID: 21553995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The Time Course of Target Template Activation Processes during Preparation for Visual Search.
Grubert A; Eimer M
J Neurosci; 2018 Oct; 38(44):9527-9538. PubMed ID: 30242053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The role of attention in binding visual features in working memory: evidence from cognitive ageing.
Brown LA; Brockmole JR
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Oct; 63(10):2067-79. PubMed ID: 20446186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Multiple attentional sets while monitoring rapid serial visual presentations.
Kawahara JI; Kumada T
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Nov; 70(11):2271-2289. PubMed ID: 27603438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Sources of top-down control in visual search.
Weidner R; Krummenacher J; Reimann B; Müller HJ; Fink GR
J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Nov; 21(11):2100-13. PubMed ID: 19199412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Feature specificity in attentional capture by size and color.
Harris AM; Remington RW; Becker SI
J Vis; 2013 May; 13(3):. PubMed ID: 23650630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Grouping and binding in visual short-term memory.
Quinlan PT; Cohen DJ
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 Sep; 38(5):1432-8. PubMed ID: 22449133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Greater frontal-parietal synchrony at low gamma-band frequencies for inefficient than efficient visual search in human EEG.
Phillips S; Takeda Y
Int J Psychophysiol; 2009 Sep; 73(3):350-4. PubMed ID: 19481120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Visual marking: the influence of temporary changes on time-based visual selection.
Watson DG; Compton S; Bailey H
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Dec; 37(6):1729-38. PubMed ID: 21517208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Determining the capacity of time-based selection.
Watson DG; Kunar MA
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Apr; 38(2):350-66. PubMed ID: 22004197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
