These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22834726)

  • 1. Comparison of fracture-load values of cantilevered FDPs.
    Ohlmann B; Dittmar A; Rues S; Rammelsberg P
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2013; 71(3-4):584-9. PubMed ID: 22834726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Fracture-load values of all-ceramic cantilevered FPDs with different framework designs.
    Ohlmann B; Marienburg K; Gabbert O; Hassel A; Gilde H; Rammelsberg P
    Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(1):49-52. PubMed ID: 19260427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of gingival ceramic veneer thickness on the fracture strength of zirconia-based fixed dental prostheses.
    Gabbert O; Ohlmann B; Schmitter M; Farhan D; Becker F; Rammelsberg P
    Am J Dent; 2010 Jun; 23(3):147-51. PubMed ID: 20718211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of zirconium-oxide-based ceramic single-unit posterior fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) generated with two CAD/CAM systems compared to porcelain-fused-to-metal single-unit posterior FDPs: a 5-year clinical prospective study.
    Vigolo P; Mutinelli S
    J Prosthodont; 2012 Jun; 21(4):265-9. PubMed ID: 22339945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Outcome of posterior fixed dental prostheses made from veneered zirconia over an observation period of up to 13 years.
    Passia N; Chaar MS; Kern M
    J Dent; 2019 Jul; 86():126-129. PubMed ID: 31150728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Randomized controlled clinical trial of zirconia-ceramic and metal-ceramic posterior fixed dental prostheses: a 3-year follow-up.
    Sailer I; Gottnerb J; Kanelb S; Hammerle CH
    Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(6):553-60. PubMed ID: 19918588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of veneering materials on fracture loads of implant-supported zirconia molar fixed dental prostheses.
    Kondo T; Komine F; Honda J; Takata H; Moriya Y
    J Prosthodont Res; 2019 Apr; 63(2):140-144. PubMed ID: 30446411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of two connector designs on the fracture resistance of all-ceramic core materials for fixed dental prostheses.
    Plengsombut K; Brewer JD; Monaco EA; Davis EL
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Mar; 101(3):166-73. PubMed ID: 19231568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Zirconium dioxide based dental restorations. Studies on clinical performance and fracture behaviour.
    Larsson C
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 2011; (213):9-84. PubMed ID: 21919311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. All-ceramic fixed partial dentures. Studies on aluminum oxide- and zirconium dioxide-based ceramic systems.
    Vult von Steyern P
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 2005; (173):1-69. PubMed ID: 16001730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Fracture resistance of monolithic and veneered all-ceramic four-unit posterior fixed dental prostheses after artificial aging.
    Güngör MB; Nemli SK; Bal BT; Tamam E; Yılmaz H; Aydın C
    J Oral Sci; 2019 Jun; 61(2):246-254. PubMed ID: 31006735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Monolithic and bi-layer CAD/CAM lithium-disilicate versus metal-ceramic fixed dental prostheses: comparison of fracture loads and failure modes after fatigue.
    Schultheis S; Strub JR; Gerds TA; Guess PC
    Clin Oral Investig; 2013 Jun; 17(5):1407-13. PubMed ID: 23001151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of fracture resistance of pressable metal ceramic custom implant abutments with CAD/CAM commercially fabricated zirconia implant abutments.
    Kim S; Kim HI; Brewer JD; Monaco EA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Apr; 101(4):226-30. PubMed ID: 19328275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fracture resistance of lithium disilicate-, alumina-, and zirconia-based three-unit fixed partial dentures: a laboratory study.
    Tinschert J; Natt G; Mautsch W; Augthun M; Spiekermann H
    Int J Prosthodont; 2001; 14(3):231-8. PubMed ID: 11484570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A four-year prospective clinical evaluation of zirconia and metal-ceramic posterior fixed dental prostheses.
    Pelaez J; Cogolludo PG; Serrano B; Serrano JF; Suarez MJ
    Int J Prosthodont; 2012; 25(5):451-8. PubMed ID: 22930766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16.
    Choi JW; Kim SY; Bae JH; Bae EB; Huh JB
    J Adv Prosthodont; 2017 Aug; 9(4):244-251. PubMed ID: 28874990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Load-Bearing Capacity of Monolithic Zirconia Fixed Dental Prostheses Fabricated with Different Connector Designs and Embrasure Shaping Methods.
    Bakitian F; Seweryniak P; Papia E; Larsson C; Vult von Steyern P
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Jan; 28(1):64-70. PubMed ID: 30478870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparison of the marginal vertical discrepancies of zirconium and metal ceramic posterior fixed dental prostheses before and after cementation.
    Gonzalo E; Suárez MJ; Serrano B; Lozano JF
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Dec; 102(6):378-84. PubMed ID: 19961996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Finite element analysis to compare stress distribution of gold alloy, lithium-disilicate reinforced glass ceramic and zirconia based fixed partial denture.
    Zheng Z; Lin J; Shinya A; Matinlinna JP; Botelho MG; Shinya A
    J Investig Clin Dent; 2012 Nov; 3(4):291-7. PubMed ID: 22977016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Fracture mode during cyclic loading of implant-supported single-tooth restorations.
    Hosseini M; Kleven E; Gotfredsen K
    J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Aug; 108(2):74-83. PubMed ID: 22867804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.