240 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22835781)
21. Value of magnetic resonance imaging for nodal staging in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: a meta-analysis.
Wu LM; Xu JR; Liu MJ; Zhang XF; Hua J; Zheng J; Hu JN
Acad Radiol; 2012 Mar; 19(3):331-40. PubMed ID: 22153656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Staging of uterine cervical carcinoma: whole-body diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging.
Chen YB; Hu CM; Chen GL; Hu D; Liao J
Abdom Imaging; 2011 Oct; 36(5):619-26. PubMed ID: 20730423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Relative apparent diffusion coefficient: determination of reference site and validation of benefit for detecting metastatic lymph nodes in uterine cervical cancer.
Park SO; Kim JK; Kim KA; Park BW; Kim N; Cho G; Choi HJ; Cho KS
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2009 Feb; 29(2):383-90. PubMed ID: 19161191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Pattern analysis of regional spread and therapeutic lymph node dissection in cervical cancer based on ontogenetic anatomy.
Höckel M; Horn LC; Tetsch E; Einenkel J
Gynecol Oncol; 2012 Apr; 125(1):168-74. PubMed ID: 22155677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Prognostic factors in surgically treated stage ib-iib cervical carcinomas with special emphasis on the importance of tumor volume.
Trattner M; Graf AH; Lax S; Forstner R; Dandachi N; Haas J; Pickel H; Reich O; Staudach A; Winter R
Gynecol Oncol; 2001 Jul; 82(1):11-6. PubMed ID: 11426955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Identification of micrometastases in histologically negative lymph nodes of early-stage cervical cancer patients.
Lentz SE; Muderspach LI; Felix JC; Ye W; Groshen S; Amezcua CA
Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Jun; 103(6):1204-10. PubMed ID: 15172853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Sentinel lymph node biopsy is not accurate in predicting lymph node status for patients with cervical carcinoma.
Marchiolè P; Buénerd A; Scoazec JY; Dargent D; Mathevet P
Cancer; 2004 May; 100(10):2154-9. PubMed ID: 15139058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. [Clinical significance of diffusion-weighted MRI with STIR-EPI in differential diagnosis of cervical lymph nodes].
Zhang Y; Liang BL; Gao L; Zhong JL; Ye RX; Shen J
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2007 Jan; 29(1):70-3. PubMed ID: 17575700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. [Value of diffusion-weighted imaging in diagnosis of lymph node metastasis in patients with cervical cancer].
Zhang J; Ren C; Xue HD; Zhou HL; Sun ZY; Jin ZY
Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao; 2014 Feb; 36(1):73-8. PubMed ID: 24581133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Early invasive cervical cancer: tumor delineation by magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography, and clinical examination, verified by pathologic results, in the ACRIN 6651/GOG 183 Intergroup Study.
Mitchell DG; Snyder B; Coakley F; Reinhold C; Thomas G; Amendola M; Schwartz LH; Woodward P; Pannu H; Hricak H
J Clin Oncol; 2006 Dec; 24(36):5687-94. PubMed ID: 17179104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in patients selected for radical cystectomy: detection rate of pelvic lymph node metastases.
Papalia R; Simone G; Grasso R; Augelli R; Faiella E; Guaglianone S; Cazzato R; Del Vescovo R; Ferriero M; Zobel B; Gallucci M
BJU Int; 2012 Apr; 109(7):1031-6. PubMed ID: 21883835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (type II-III) with pelvic lymphadenectomy in early invasive cervical cancer.
Gil-Moreno A; Puig O; Pérez-Benavente MA; Díaz B; Vergés R; De la Torre J; Martínez-Palones JM; Xercavins J
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2005; 12(2):113-20. PubMed ID: 15904613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Potential and limitations of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in kidney, prostate, and bladder cancer including pelvic lymph node staging: a critical analysis of the literature.
Giannarini G; Petralia G; Thoeny HC
Eur Urol; 2012 Feb; 61(2):326-40. PubMed ID: 22000497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Conventional and diffusion-weighted MRI features in diagnosis of metastatic lymphadenopathy in bladder cancer.
Wollin DA; Deng FM; Huang WC; Babb JS; Rosenkrantz AB
Can J Urol; 2014 Oct; 21(5):7454-9. PubMed ID: 25347370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The outcome of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy for cervical cancer: a prospective analysis of 295 patients.
Chen Y; Xu H; Li Y; Wang D; Li J; Yuan J; Liang Z
Ann Surg Oncol; 2008 Oct; 15(10):2847-55. PubMed ID: 18649105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. MRI for pretreatment lymph node staging in uterine cervical cancer.
Choi HJ; Kim SH; Seo SS; Kang S; Lee S; Kim JY; Kim YH; Lee JS; Chung HH; Lee JH; Park SY
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Nov; 187(5):W538-43. PubMed ID: 17056887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Pretreatment staging of cervical cancer: is imaging better than palpation?: Role of CT and MRI in preoperative staging of cervical cancer: single institution results for 255 patients.
Hancke K; Heilmann V; Straka P; Kreienberg R; Kurzeder C
Ann Surg Oncol; 2008 Oct; 15(10):2856-61. PubMed ID: 18696156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Metastases in normal-sized pelvic lymph nodes: detection with diffusion-weighted MR imaging.
Thoeny HC; Froehlich JM; Triantafyllou M; Huesler J; Bains LJ; Vermathen P; Fleischmann A; Studer UE
Radiology; 2014 Oct; 273(1):125-35. PubMed ID: 24893049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Detection of prostate cancer with magnetic resonance imaging: optimization of T1-weighted, T2-weighted, dynamic-enhanced T1-weighted, diffusion-weighted imaging apparent diffusion coefficient mapping sequences and MR spectroscopy, correlated with biopsy and histopathological findings.
Aydin H; Kizilgöz V; Tatar IG; Damar C; Ugan AR; Paker I; Hekimoğlu B
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2012; 36(1):30-45. PubMed ID: 22261768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Apparent diffusion coefficient ratio between axillary lymph node with primary tumor to detect nodal metastasis in breast cancer patients.
Luo N; Su D; Jin G; Liu L; Zhu X; Xie D; Liu Y
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2013 Oct; 38(4):824-8. PubMed ID: 23440958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
