These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22837539)

  • 21. Assessing personality with a structured employment interview: construct-related validity and susceptibility to response inflation.
    Van Iddekinge CH; Raymark PH; Roth PL
    J Appl Psychol; 2005 May; 90(3):536-52. PubMed ID: 15910148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Validation of the Swedish version of the NEO-PI-R: correlations between self-reports and college peer ratings.
    Westerlund J; Hansen N
    Psychol Rep; 2009 Dec; 105(3 Pt 1):815-24. PubMed ID: 20099543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The big five personality traits: psychological entities or statistical constructs?
    Franić S; Borsboom D; Dolan CV; Boomsma DI
    Behav Genet; 2014 Nov; 44(6):591-604. PubMed ID: 24162101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Assessing adolescents' personality with the NEO PI-R.
    De Fruyt F; Mervielde I; Hoekstra HA; Rolland JP
    Assessment; 2000 Dec; 7(4):329-45. PubMed ID: 11172584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Substance or style? An investigation of the NEO-PI-R validity scales.
    Morey LC; Quigley BD; Sanislow CA; Skodol AE; McGlashan TH; Shea MT; Stout RL; Zanarini MC; Gunderson JG
    J Pers Assess; 2002 Dec; 79(3):583-99. PubMed ID: 12511022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Partial confirmatory factor analysis: described and illustrated on the NEO-PI-R.
    Gignac GE
    J Pers Assess; 2009 Jan; 91(1):40-7. PubMed ID: 19085282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The Five-factor Personality Inventory as a measure of the Five-factor Model: Belgian, American, and Hungarian comparisons with the NEO-PI-R.
    De Fruyt F; McCrae RR; Szirmák Z; Nagy J
    Assessment; 2004 Sep; 11(3):207-15. PubMed ID: 15358876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Effects of response sets on NEO-PI-R scores and their relations to external criteria.
    Caldwell-Andrews A; Baer RA; Berry DT
    J Pers Assess; 2000 Jun; 74(3):472-88. PubMed ID: 10900573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Exploratory structural equation modeling: an integration of the best features of exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis.
    Marsh HW; Morin AJ; Parker PD; Kaur G
    Annu Rev Clin Psychol; 2014; 10():85-110. PubMed ID: 24313568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Is it time to replace the Big Five personality model? Factorial structure of the NEO PI-R in a community sample of Spanish adults.
    Sanz-García A; García-Vera MP; Sanz J
    J Gen Psychol; 2024; 151(3):335-356. PubMed ID: 37750027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Psychometric evaluation of responses to the NEO-PI-3 in a multi-ethnic sample of adults in India.
    Piedmont RL; Braganza DJ
    Psychol Assess; 2015 Dec; 27(4):1253-63. PubMed ID: 25938339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A study of affective temperaments in Hungary: internal consistency and concurrent validity of the TEMPS-A against the TCI and NEO-PI-R.
    Rózsa S; Rihmer Z; Gonda X; Szili I; Rihmer A; Ko N; Németh A; Pestality P; Bagdy G; Alhassoon O; Akiskal KK; Akiskal HS
    J Affect Disord; 2008 Feb; 106(1-2):45-53. PubMed ID: 17706791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Modeling general and specific variance in multifaceted constructs: a comparison of the bifactor model to other approaches.
    Chen FF; Hayes A; Carver CS; Laurenceau JP; Zhang Z
    J Pers; 2012 Feb; 80(1):219-51. PubMed ID: 22092195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Assessing the five factors of personality in adolescents: the junior version of the Spanish NEO-PI-R.
    Ortet G; Ibáñez MI; Moya J; Villa H; Viruela A; Mezquita L
    Assessment; 2012 Mar; 19(1):114-30. PubMed ID: 21622482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Why item parcels are (almost) never appropriate: two wrongs do not make a right--camouflaging misspecification with item parcels in CFA models.
    Marsh HW; Lüdtke O; Nagengast B; Morin AJ; Von Davier M
    Psychol Methods; 2013 Sep; 18(3):257-84. PubMed ID: 23834417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A comparison of Agreeableness scores from the Big Five Inventory and the NEO PI-R: consequences for the study of narcissism and psychopathy.
    Miller JD; Gaughan ET; Maples J; Price J
    Assessment; 2011 Sep; 18(3):335-9. PubMed ID: 21665883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Factor structure of the Dimensional Assessment of Personality Pathology-Basic Questionnaire and its relationship with the revised NEO personality inventory in a Japanese sample.
    Maruta T; Yamate T; Iimori M; Kato M; Livesley WJ
    Compr Psychiatry; 2006; 47(6):528-33. PubMed ID: 17067879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Construct Validity of the Social Provisions Scale: A Bifactor Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling Approach.
    Perera HN
    Assessment; 2016 Dec; 23(6):720-733. PubMed ID: 26063712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Prospective prediction of college adjustment using self- and informant-rated personality traits.
    Kurtz JE; Puher MA; Cross NA
    J Pers Assess; 2012; 94(6):630-7. PubMed ID: 22489598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Describing depressive personality analogues and dysthymics on the NEO-Personality Inventory-Revised.
    Huprich SK
    J Clin Psychol; 2000 Dec; 56(12):1521-34. PubMed ID: 11132568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.