These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

87 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2283842)

  • 1. [Work load evaluation systems. How to chose the best tool].
    Fasnacht D; Weissbrodt G
    Krankenpfl Soins Infirm; 1990 Dec; 83(12):19-21. PubMed ID: 2283842
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Setting standards and evaluating nursing performance with a single tool.
    Fosbinder D; Vos H
    J Nurs Adm; 1989 Oct; 19(10):23-30. PubMed ID: 2778515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [The evaluation coefficients of work participation].
    Sviridov GF
    Med Sestra; 1990 Aug; 49(8):17-9. PubMed ID: 2287215
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Evaluation of the work of nurses by reckoning with the results of socialist competition].
    Khorov GV; Alekseev AV; Borovitskaia LV
    Med Sestra; 1988 Jun; 47(6):11-4. PubMed ID: 3412159
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Information value of "additional tasks" method to evaluate pilot's work load].
    Gorbunov VV
    Med Tr Prom Ekol; 2005; (10):30-5. PubMed ID: 16315588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Performance appraisal systems in health care administration.
    Wiatrowski MD; Palkon DS
    Health Care Manage Rev; 1987; 12(1):71-80. PubMed ID: 3557974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Developing performance appraisal tool for staff nurses.
    Arora T
    Nurs J India; 2009 Feb; 100(2):32-4. PubMed ID: 19588657
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Work monitored electronically.
    Grant R
    HRMAGAZINE; 1992 May; 37(5):81, 83-4, 86. PubMed ID: 10130741
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Performance evaluation of staff nurses.
    Goodykoontz L
    Superv Nurse; 1981 Aug; 12(8):39-43. PubMed ID: 6910946
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Methods of evaluation of the quality of care in hospital nursing].
    Servir; 1994; 42(6):328-30. PubMed ID: 7732398
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Performance appraisal tests for staff nurses.
    Cunningham CV
    Nurs Times; 1981 May; 77(22):suppl 16: 61-3. PubMed ID: 6909815
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [An attempt at objective evaluation].
    Rev Infirm; 1987 Sep; 37(14):31-3. PubMed ID: 3671984
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Assessment of the work efficiency of nurses].
    Vedenko BG; Sushchik LP; Vedenko LB
    Med Sestra; 1985 Sep; 44(9):24-6. PubMed ID: 3853062
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Performance appraisal of staff nurses - part III. Developing performance standards and an evaluation tool for staff nurses.
    Bray KA
    Crit Care Nurse; 1982; 2(5):36-44. PubMed ID: 6924871
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Developing valid employee appraisal systems.
    Thompson K; Wesley AM
    Health Serv Manager; 1980 Apr; 13(4):5-7, 10. PubMed ID: 10246700
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Development of a job-specific, criteria-based performance appraisal tool for staff pharmacists.
    Hoffman RP
    Hosp Pharm; 1986 Mar; 21(3):220-6. PubMed ID: 10275584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A competency-based approach to public health nursing performance appraisal.
    Kalb KB; Cherry NM; Kauzloric J; Brender A; Green K; Miyagawa L; Shinoda-Mettler A
    Public Health Nurs; 2006; 23(2):115-38. PubMed ID: 16684187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Criteria for assessing the work of the staff members of a forensic biology department of a bureau of forensic medical expertise].
    Suleĭmenova GM
    Sud Med Ekspert; 1992; 35(1):45-7. PubMed ID: 1534188
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Understanding, evaluating and improving nursing productivity.
    Williamson WJ; Johnston J
    Nurs Manage; 1988 May; 19(5):49-50, 52, 54. PubMed ID: 3368148
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Being objective about appraisal.
    McKenzie I
    Nurs Times; 1985 Dec 18-31; 81(51):25-6. PubMed ID: 3853781
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.