These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1074 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22839756)

  • 1. Hybrid dynamic stabilization: a biomechanical assessment of adjacent and supraadjacent levels of the lumbar spine.
    Mageswaran P; Techy F; Colbrunn RW; Bonner TF; McLain RF
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2012 Sep; 17(3):232-42. PubMed ID: 22839756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Immediate biomechanical effects of lumbar posterior dynamic stabilization above a circumferential fusion.
    Cheng BC; Gordon J; Cheng J; Welch WC
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Nov; 32(23):2551-7. PubMed ID: 17978653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Biomechanical comparison of single-level posterior versus transforaminal lumbar interbody fusions with bilateral pedicle screw fixation: segmental stability and the effects on adjacent motion segments.
    Sim HB; Murovic JA; Cho BY; Lim TJ; Park J
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2010 Jun; 12(6):700-8. PubMed ID: 20515358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Biomechanical evaluation of a new pedicle screw-based posterior dynamic stabilization device (Awesome Rod System)--a finite element analysis.
    Chen CS; Huang CH; Shih SL
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2015 Apr; 16():81. PubMed ID: 25880231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The biomechanics of a multilevel lumbar spine hybrid using nucleus replacement in conjunction with fusion.
    Dahl MC; Ellingson AM; Mehta HP; Huelman JH; Nuckley DJ
    Spine J; 2013 Feb; 13(2):175-83. PubMed ID: 23318109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Kinematic evaluation of one- and two-level Maverick lumbar total disc replacement caudal to a long thoracolumbar spinal fusion.
    Zhu Q; Itshayek E; Jones CF; Schwab T; Larson CR; Lenke LG; Cripton PA
    Eur Spine J; 2012 Jun; 21 Suppl 5(Suppl 5):S599-611. PubMed ID: 22531900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Biomechanical analysis of a novel posterior construct in a transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion model an in vitro study.
    Sethi A; Muzumdar AM; Ingalhalikar A; Vaidya R
    Spine J; 2011 Sep; 11(9):863-9. PubMed ID: 21802998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. In vitro biomechanical study to quantify range of motion, intradiscal pressure, and facet force of 3-level dynamic stabilization constructs with decreased stiffness.
    Lee JK; Gomez J; Michelsen C; Kim Y; Moldavsky M; Chinthakunta SR; Khalil S
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Oct; 38(22):1913-9. PubMed ID: 23921330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: the effect of various instrumentation techniques on the flexibility of the lumbar spine.
    Harris BM; Hilibrand AS; Savas PE; Pellegrino A; Vaccaro AR; Siegler S; Albert TJ
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2004 Feb; 29(4):E65-70. PubMed ID: 15094547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Properties of an interspinous fixation device (ISD) in lumbar fusion constructs: a biomechanical study.
    Techy F; Mageswaran P; Colbrunn RW; Bonner TF; McLain RF
    Spine J; 2013 May; 13(5):572-9. PubMed ID: 23498926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The protective role of dynamic stabilization on the adjacent disc to a rigid instrumented level. An in vitro biomechanical analysis.
    Cabello J; Cavanilles-Walker JM; Iborra M; Ubierna MT; Covaro A; Roca J
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2013 Apr; 133(4):443-8. PubMed ID: 23371399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Junction kinematics between proximal mobile and distal fused lumbar segments: biomechanical analysis of pedicle and hook constructs.
    Hongo M; Gay RE; Zhao KD; Ilharreborde B; Huddleston PM; Berglund LJ; An KN; Zhao C
    Spine J; 2009 Oct; 9(10):846-53. PubMed ID: 19660990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Biomechanics of dynamic rod segments for achieving transitional stiffness with lumbosacral fusion.
    Lazaro BC; Reyes PM; Newcomb AG; Yaqoobi AS; Brasiliense LB; Sonntag VK; Crawford NR
    Neurosurgery; 2013 Sep; 73(3):517-27. PubMed ID: 23756746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Adjacent segment mobility after rigid and semirigid instrumentation of the lumbar spine.
    Cakir B; Carazzo C; Schmidt R; Mattes T; Reichel H; Käfer W
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 May; 34(12):1287-91. PubMed ID: 19455004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Biomechanical comparison of an interspinous device and a rigid stabilization on lumbar adjacent segment range of motion.
    Hartmann F; Dietz SO; Kuhn S; Hely H; Rommens PM; Gercek E
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2011; 78(5):404-9. PubMed ID: 22094153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A biomechanical cadaveric study of a modified U-shaped interspinous distraction device.
    Singhatanadgige W; Tangpornprasert P; Wangroongsub Y; Itiravivong P; Limpaphayom N
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2014 Jul; 27(5):290-6. PubMed ID: 24979230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Biomechanical effects of disc degeneration and hybrid fixation on the transition and adjacent lumbar segments: trade-off between junctional problem, motion preservation, and load protection.
    Chuang WH; Lin SC; Chen SH; Wang CW; Tsai WC; Chen YJ; Hwang JR
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Nov; 37(24):E1488-97. PubMed ID: 22872225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Segmental motion adjacent to an instrumented lumbar fusion: the effect of extension of fusion to the sacrum.
    Untch C; Liu Q; Hart R
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2004 Nov; 29(21):2376-81. PubMed ID: 15507798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The biomechanical effects of spondylolysis and its treatment.
    Mihara H; Onari K; Cheng BC; David SM; Zdeblick TA
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Feb; 28(3):235-8. PubMed ID: 12567023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Biomechanical comparison of iliac screws versus interbody femoral ring allograft on lumbosacral kinematics and sacral screw strain.
    Cunningham BW; Sefter JC; Hu N; Kim SW; Bridwell KH; McAfee PC
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Mar; 35(6):E198-205. PubMed ID: 20195199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 54.