499 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22841854)
1. Comparing the donor-site morbidity using DIEP, SIEA or MS-TRAM flaps for breast reconstructive surgery: a meta-analysis.
Egeberg A; Rasmussen MK; Sørensen JA
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2012 Nov; 65(11):1474-80. PubMed ID: 22841854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effects of Obesity on Postoperative Complications After Breast Reconstruction Using Free Muscle-Sparing Transverse Rectus Abdominis Myocutaneous, Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator, and Superficial Inferior Epigastric Artery Flap: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Lee KT; Mun GH
Ann Plast Surg; 2016 May; 76(5):576-84. PubMed ID: 25536199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Double pedicle deep inferior epigastric perforator/muscle-sparing TRAM flaps for unilateral breast reconstruction.
Agarwal JP; Gottlieb LJ
Ann Plast Surg; 2007 Apr; 58(4):359-63. PubMed ID: 17413875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Breast reconstruction with superficial inferior epigastric artery flaps: a prospective comparison with TRAM and DIEP flaps.
Chevray PM
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2004 Oct; 114(5):1077-83; discussion 1084-5. PubMed ID: 15457015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Meta-analysis of the safety and factors contributing to complications of MS-TRAM, DIEP, and SIEA flaps for breast reconstruction.
Wang XL; Liu LB; Song FM; Wang QY
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2014 Aug; 38(4):681-91. PubMed ID: 24902911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of donor-site morbidity of SIEA, DIEP, and muscle-sparing TRAM flaps for breast reconstruction.
Wu LC; Bajaj A; Chang DW; Chevray PM
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2008 Sep; 122(3):702-709. PubMed ID: 18766032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Muscle sparing-2 transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flap for breast reconstruction: a comparison with deep inferior epigastric perforator flap.
Takeishi M; Fujimoto M; Ishida K; Makino Y
Microsurgery; 2008; 28(8):650-5. PubMed ID: 18844226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of outcomes and donor-site morbidity in unilateral free TRAM versus DIEP flap breast reconstruction.
Schaverien MV; Perks AG; McCulley SJ
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2007; 60(11):1219-24. PubMed ID: 17720644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Transversus abdominis plane (TAP) catheters inserted under direct vision in the donor site following free DIEP and MS-TRAM breast reconstruction: a prospective cohort study of 45 patients.
Zhong T; Wong KW; Cheng H; Ojha M; Srinivas C; McCluskey SA; Clarke H; Jacks L; Hofer SO
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2013 Mar; 66(3):329-36. PubMed ID: 23142025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Meta-analysis of flap perfusion and donor site complications for breast reconstruction using pedicled versus free TRAM and DIEP flaps.
Jeong W; Lee S; Kim J
Breast; 2018 Apr; 38():45-51. PubMed ID: 29227815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Inclusion of mesh in donor-site repair of free TRAM and muscle-sparing free TRAM flaps yields rates of abdominal complications comparable to those of DIEP flap reconstruction.
Wan DC; Tseng CY; Anderson-Dam J; Dalio AL; Crisera CA; Festekjian JH
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2010 Aug; 126(2):367-374. PubMed ID: 20679822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A cost-effectiveness analysis of DIEP vs free MS-TRAM flap for microsurgical breast reconstruction.
Tan MG; Isaranuwatchai W; DeLyzer T; Butler K; Hofer SOP; O'Neill AC; Zhong T
J Surg Oncol; 2019 Mar; 119(3):388-396. PubMed ID: 30562406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Myosonographic evaluation of rectus abdominis muscle function after DIEP flap breast reconstruction].
Kässmann C; Peek A; Luxenhofer F; Scheufler O; Exner K
Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir; 2002 Nov; 34(6):386-94. PubMed ID: 12601605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Complications and Patient-Reported Outcomes after Abdominally Based Breast Reconstruction: Results of the Mastectomy Reconstruction Outcomes Consortium Study.
Erdmann-Sager J; Wilkins EG; Pusic AL; Qi J; Hamill JB; Kim HM; Guldbrandsen GE; Chun YS
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2018 Feb; 141(2):271-281. PubMed ID: 29019862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of donor-site complications and functional outcomes in free muscle-sparing TRAM flap and free DIEP flap breast reconstruction.
Bajaj AK; Chevray PM; Chang DW
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2006 Mar; 117(3):737-46; discussion 747-50. PubMed ID: 16525258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Ischemic complications in pedicle, free, and muscle sparing transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flaps for breast reconstruction.
Andrades P; Fix RJ; Danilla S; Howell RE; Campbell WJ; De la Torre J; Vasconez LO
Ann Plast Surg; 2008 May; 60(5):562-7. PubMed ID: 18434832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Breast reconstruction with a combined skin flap of DIEP and TRAM].
Luan J; Mu LH; Fan F; Mu DL; Liu C; Niu ZH; You JJ; Wang S; Wang LY; Zheng YH
Zhonghua Zheng Xing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2006 Jan; 22(1):5-7. PubMed ID: 16573154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of morbidity, functional outcome, and satisfaction following bilateral TRAM versus bilateral DIEP flap breast reconstruction.
Chun YS; Sinha I; Turko A; Yueh JH; Lipsitz S; Pribaz JJ; Lee BT
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2010 Oct; 126(4):1133-1141. PubMed ID: 20555301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Abdominal wall following free TRAM or DIEP flap reconstruction: a meta-analysis and critical review.
Man LX; Selber JC; Serletti JM
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2009 Sep; 124(3):752-764. PubMed ID: 19342994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Preoperative computed tomography angiogram to predict patients with favorable anatomy for superficial inferior epigastric artery flap breast reconstruction.
Piorkowski JR; DeRosier LC; Nickerson P; Fix RJ
Ann Plast Surg; 2011 May; 66(5):534-6. PubMed ID: 21407054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
