These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22842118)

  • 21. Comparison of algorithms for the analysis of Affymetrix microarray data as evaluated by co-expression of genes in known operons.
    Harr B; Schlötterer C
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2006 Jan; 34(2):e8. PubMed ID: 16432259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A new non-linear normalization method for reducing variability in DNA microarray experiments.
    Workman C; Jensen LJ; Jarmer H; Berka R; Gautier L; Nielser HB; Saxild HH; Nielsen C; Brunak S; Knudsen S
    Genome Biol; 2002 Aug; 3(9):research0048. PubMed ID: 12225587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Using generalized procrustes analysis (GPA) for normalization of cDNA microarray data.
    Xiong H; Zhang D; Martyniuk CJ; Trudeau VL; Xia X
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2008 Jan; 9():25. PubMed ID: 18199333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Impact of DNA microarray data transformation on gene expression analysis - comparison of two normalization methods.
    Schmidt MT; Handschuh L; Zyprych J; Szabelska A; Olejnik-Schmidt AK; Siatkowski I; Figlerowicz M
    Acta Biochim Pol; 2011; 58(4):573-80. PubMed ID: 22187680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The impact of quantile and rank normalization procedures on the testing power of gene differential expression analysis.
    Qiu X; Wu H; Hu R
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2013 Apr; 14():124. PubMed ID: 23578321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Meta-coexpression conservation analysis of microarray data: a "subset" approach provides insight into brain-derived neurotrophic factor regulation.
    Aid-Pavlidis T; Pavlidis P; Timmusk T
    BMC Genomics; 2009 Sep; 10():420. PubMed ID: 19737418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A new outlier removal approach for cDNA microarray normalization.
    Wu Y; Yan L; Liu H; Sun H; Xie H
    Biotechniques; 2009 Aug; 47(2):691-2, 694-700. PubMed ID: 19737130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. New normalization methods for cDNA microarray data.
    Wilson DL; Buckley MJ; Helliwell CA; Wilson IW
    Bioinformatics; 2003 Jul; 19(11):1325-32. PubMed ID: 12874043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Group testing for pathway analysis improves comparability of different microarray datasets.
    Manoli T; Gretz N; Gröne HJ; Kenzelmann M; Eils R; Brors B
    Bioinformatics; 2006 Oct; 22(20):2500-6. PubMed ID: 16895928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Gene ARMADA: an integrated multi-analysis platform for microarray data implemented in MATLAB.
    Chatziioannou A; Moulos P; Kolisis FN
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2009 Oct; 10():354. PubMed ID: 19860866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Exploring matrix factorization techniques for significant genes identification of Alzheimer's disease microarray gene expression data.
    Kong W; Mou X; Hu X
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2011; 12 Suppl 5(Suppl 5):S7. PubMed ID: 21989140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Cross platform microarray analysis for robust identification of differentially expressed genes.
    Bosotti R; Locatelli G; Healy S; Scacheri E; Sartori L; Mercurio C; Calogero R; Isacchi A
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2007 Mar; 8 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S5. PubMed ID: 17430572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Robust microarray meta-analysis identifies differentially expressed genes for clinical prediction.
    Phan JH; Young AN; Wang MD
    ScientificWorldJournal; 2012; 2012():989637. PubMed ID: 23365541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Consistent Differential Expression Pattern (CDEP) on microarray to identify genes related to metastatic behavior.
    Tsoi LC; Qin T; Slate EH; Zheng WJ
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2011 Nov; 12():438. PubMed ID: 22078224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The Global Error Assessment (GEA) model for the selection of differentially expressed genes in microarray data.
    Mansourian R; Mutch DM; Antille N; Aubert J; Fogel P; Le Goff JM; Moulin J; Petrov A; Rytz A; Voegel JJ; Roberts MA
    Bioinformatics; 2004 Nov; 20(16):2726-37. PubMed ID: 15145801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Mining published lists of cancer related microarray experiments: identification of a gene expression signature having a critical role in cell-cycle control.
    Finocchiaro G; Mancuso F; Muller H
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 Dec; 6 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):S14. PubMed ID: 16351740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Analysis of high density expression microarrays with signed-rank call algorithms.
    Liu WM; Mei R; Di X; Ryder TB; Hubbell E; Dee S; Webster TA; Harrington CA; Ho MH; Baid J; Smeekens SP
    Bioinformatics; 2002 Dec; 18(12):1593-9. PubMed ID: 12490443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Microarray data simulator for improved selection of differentially expressed genes.
    Singhal S; Kyvernitis CG; Johnson SW; Kaiser LR; Liebman MN; Albelda SM
    Cancer Biol Ther; 2003; 2(4):383-91. PubMed ID: 14508110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Merging microarray data from separate breast cancer studies provides a robust prognostic test.
    Xu L; Tan AC; Winslow RL; Geman D
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2008 Feb; 9():125. PubMed ID: 18304324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Analysis of DNA microarray expression data.
    Simon R
    Best Pract Res Clin Haematol; 2009 Jun; 22(2):271-82. PubMed ID: 19698933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.