These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

281 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22842471)

  • 1. Enhancement from targets and suppression from cues in fast task-irrelevant perceptual learning.
    Leclercq V; Seitz AR
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2012 Sep; 141(1):31-8. PubMed ID: 22842471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Fast task-irrelevant perceptual learning is disrupted by sudden onset of central task elements.
    Leclercq V; Seitz AR
    Vision Res; 2012 May; 61():70-6. PubMed ID: 21810439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The impact of orienting attention in fast task-irrelevant perceptual learning.
    Leclercq V; Seitz AR
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 May; 74(4):648-60. PubMed ID: 22287208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Encoding of episodic information through fast task-irrelevant perceptual learning.
    Leclercq V; Le Dantec CC; Seitz AR
    Vision Res; 2014 Jun; 99():5-11. PubMed ID: 24070687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Uncertainty in fast task-irrelevant perceptual learning boosts learning of images in women but not men.
    Leclercq V; Cohen Hoffing R; Seitz AR
    J Vis; 2014 Oct; 14(12):. PubMed ID: 25342543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fast-TIPL occurs for salient images without a memorization requirement in men but not in women.
    Leclercq V; Seitz AR
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(4):e36228. PubMed ID: 22558395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Perceptual load interacts with stimulus processing across sensory modalities.
    Klemen J; Büchel C; Rose M
    Eur J Neurosci; 2009 Jun; 29(12):2426-34. PubMed ID: 19490081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The phenomenon of task-irrelevant perceptual learning.
    Seitz AR; Watanabe T
    Vision Res; 2009 Oct; 49(21):2604-10. PubMed ID: 19665471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Interactions between voluntary and stimulus-driven spatial attention mechanisms across sensory modalities.
    Santangelo V; Olivetti Belardinelli M; Spence C; Macaluso E
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Dec; 21(12):2384-97. PubMed ID: 19199406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The role of preparation and cue-modality in crossmodal task switching.
    Lukas S; Philipp AM; Koch I
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 Jul; 134(3):318-22. PubMed ID: 20398881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Repetition priming for multisensory stimuli: task-irrelevant and task-relevant stimuli are associated if semantically related but with no advantage over uni-sensory stimuli.
    Hecht D; Reiner M; Karni A
    Brain Res; 2009 Jan; 1251():236-44. PubMed ID: 19022232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Region-specific modulations in oscillatory alpha activity serve to facilitate processing in the visual and auditory modalities.
    Mazaheri A; van Schouwenburg MR; Dimitrijevic A; Denys D; Cools R; Jensen O
    Neuroimage; 2014 Feb; 87():356-62. PubMed ID: 24188814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A unified model for perceptual learning.
    Seitz A; Watanabe T
    Trends Cogn Sci; 2005 Jul; 9(7):329-34. PubMed ID: 15955722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Steady-state signatures of visual perceptual load, multimodal distractor filtering, and neural competition.
    Parks NA; Hilimire MR; Corballis PM
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 May; 23(5):1113-24. PubMed ID: 20146614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A crossmodal crossover: opposite effects of visual and auditory perceptual load on steady-state evoked potentials to irrelevant visual stimuli.
    Jacoby O; Hall SE; Mattingley JB
    Neuroimage; 2012 Jul; 61(4):1050-8. PubMed ID: 22465299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effect of visual task difficulty and attentional direction on the detection of acoustic change as indexed by the Mismatch Negativity.
    Muller-Gass A; Stelmack RM; Campbell KB
    Brain Res; 2006 Mar; 1078(1):112-30. PubMed ID: 16497283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Learning to suppress task-irrelevant visual stimuli with attention.
    Vidnyánszky Z; Sohn W
    Vision Res; 2005 Mar; 45(6):677-85. PubMed ID: 15639494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Control of working memory: effects of attention training on target recognition and distractor salience in an auditory selection task.
    Melara RD; Tong Y; Rao A
    Brain Res; 2012 Jan; 1430():68-77. PubMed ID: 22099165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. When attention interrupts learning: inhibitory effects of attention on TIPL.
    Choi H; Seitz AR; Watanabe T
    Vision Res; 2009 Oct; 49(21):2586-90. PubMed ID: 19616021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of spatial distance to the task stimulus on task-irrelevant perceptual learning of static Gabors.
    Nishina S; Seitz AR; Kawato M; Watanabe T
    J Vis; 2007 Oct; 7(13):2.1-10. PubMed ID: 17997630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.