These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22842639)

  • 21. Comparison of psychophysical properties of two intraoral digital sensors on low-contrast perceptibility.
    Shi XQ; Benchimol D; Näsström K
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2013; 42(10):20130249. PubMed ID: 24170798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. High kilovoltage digital exposure techniques and patient dosimetry.
    Fauber TL; Cohen TF; Dempsey MC
    Radiol Technol; 2011; 82(6):501-10. PubMed ID: 21771934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Intraoral radiographic storage phosphor image mean pixel values and signal-to-noise ratio: effects of calibration.
    Hayakawa Y; Farman AG; Kelly MS; Kuroyanagi K
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1998 Nov; 86(5):601-5. PubMed ID: 9830656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Comparing 10 kVp and 15% Rules in Extremity Radiography.
    Coffey H; Chanopensiri V; Ly B; Nguyen D
    Radiol Technol; 2020 Jul; 91(6):516-524. PubMed ID: 32606229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Performance evaluation and testing of digital intra-oral radiographic systems.
    Doyle P; Finney L
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):313-7. PubMed ID: 16461488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Effects of radiographic techniques on the low-contrast detail detectability performance of digital radiography systems.
    Alsleem H; U P; Mong KS; Davidson R
    Radiol Technol; 2014; 85(6):614-22. PubMed ID: 25002641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Precise image-receptor calibration and monitoring of beam quality with a step wedge.
    Couture RA; Hildebolt CF
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2002 Jan; 31(1):56-62. PubMed ID: 11803390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Impact of Software Parameter Settings on Image Quality of Virtual Grid Processed Radiography Images: A Contrast-Detail Phantom Study.
    Gossye T; Smeets PV; Achten E; Bacher K
    Invest Radiol; 2020 Jun; 55(6):374-380. PubMed ID: 31985603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Signal-to-noise ratios of 6 intraoral digital sensors.
    Attaelmanan AG; Borg E; Gröndahl HG
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2001 May; 91(5):611-5. PubMed ID: 11346743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Does dose optimisation in digital panoramic radiography affect diagnostic performance?
    Martins LAC; Brasil DM; Forner LA; Viccari C; Haiter-Neto F; Freitas DQ; Oliveira ML
    Clin Oral Investig; 2021 Feb; 25(2):637-643. PubMed ID: 32845471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. In vitro perception of low-contrast features in digital, film, and digitized dental radiographs: a receiver operating characteristic analysis.
    Grassl U; Schulze RK
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2007 May; 103(5):694-701. PubMed ID: 17466887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Basic technical properties of a system for direct acquisition of digital intraoral radiographs.
    Welander U; Nelvig P; Tronje G; McDavid WD; Dove SB; Mörner AC; Cederlund T
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1993 Apr; 75(4):506-16. PubMed ID: 8464618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Effective dose and image optimisation of lateral lumbar spine radiography: a phantom study.
    Lai ZH; Sá Dos Reis C; Sun Z
    Eur Radiol Exp; 2020 Feb; 4(1):13. PubMed ID: 32056045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Construction of a copper stepwedge with aluminum equivalent mean gray values.
    Dündar N; Güneri P; Onem E; Boyacioğlu H
    J Appl Oral Sci; 2010; 18(4):390-6. PubMed ID: 20835575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The influence of the X-ray spectrum at compact bone-titanium interfaces in digital dental radiography.
    Nicopoulou-Karayianni K; Koligliatis T; Donta-Bakogianni C; Karayiannis A
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2006 Nov; 35(6):426-31. PubMed ID: 17082334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Radiopacity of root filling materials using digital radiography.
    Carvalho-Junior JR; Correr-Sobrinho L; Correr AB; Sinhoreti MA; Consani S; Sousa-Neto MD
    Int Endod J; 2007 Jul; 40(7):514-20. PubMed ID: 17511790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Impact of body part thickness on AP pelvis radiographic image quality and effective dose.
    Alzyoud K; Hogg P; Snaith B; Flintham K; England A
    Radiography (Lond); 2019 Feb; 25(1):e11-e17. PubMed ID: 30599841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Determining paediatric patient thickness from a single digital radiograph-a proof of principle.
    Worrall M; Vinnicombe S; Sutton DG
    Br J Radiol; 2018 Jul; 91(1087):20180139. PubMed ID: 29582670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Evaluation of endodontic files in digital radiographs before and after employing three image processing algorithms.
    Li G; Sanderink GC; Welander U; McDavid WD; Näsström K
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 Jan; 33(1):6-11. PubMed ID: 15140815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Optimization of chest radiographic imaging parameters: a comparison of image quality and entrance skin dose for digital chest radiography systems.
    Sun Z; Lin C; Tyan Y; Ng KH
    Clin Imaging; 2012; 36(4):279-86. PubMed ID: 22726965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.