173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22842986)
1. The consequences of Lactobacillus vini and Dekkera bruxellensis as contaminants of the sugarcane-based ethanol fermentation.
de Souza RB; dos Santos BM; de Fátima Rodrigues de Souza R; da Silva PK; Lucena BT; de Morais MA
J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol; 2012 Nov; 39(11):1645-50. PubMed ID: 22842986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Interaction of Saccharomyces cerevisiae-Lactobacillus fermentum-Dekkera bruxellensis and feedstock on fuel ethanol fermentation.
Bassi APG; Meneguello L; Paraluppi AL; Sanches BCP; Ceccato-Antonini SR
Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek; 2018 Sep; 111(9):1661-1672. PubMed ID: 29488182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Interaction of Lactobacillus vini with the ethanol-producing yeasts Dekkera bruxellensis and Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Tiukova I; Eberhard T; Passoth V
Biotechnol Appl Biochem; 2014; 61(1):40-4. PubMed ID: 23772864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effects of single and combined cell treatments based on low pH and high concentrations of ethanol on the growth and fermentation of Dekkera bruxellensis and Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Bassi AP; da Silva JC; Reis VR; Ceccato-Antonini SR
World J Microbiol Biotechnol; 2013 Sep; 29(9):1661-76. PubMed ID: 23536198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The physiological characteristics of the yeast Dekkera bruxellensis in fully fermentative conditions with cell recycling and in mixed cultures with Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Pereira LF; Bassi AP; Avansini SH; Neto AG; Brasileiro BT; Ceccato-Antonini SR; de Morais MA
Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek; 2012 Mar; 101(3):529-39. PubMed ID: 22041979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Fermentative and growth performances of Dekkera bruxellensis in different batch systems and the effect of initial low cell counts in co-cultures with Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Meneghin MC; Bassi AP; Codato CB; Reis VR; Ceccato-Antonini SR
Yeast; 2013 Aug; 30(8):295-305. PubMed ID: 23658026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Potassium metabisulphite as a potential biocide against Dekkera bruxellensis in fuel ethanol fermentations.
Bassi AP; Paraluppi AL; Reis VR; Ceccato-Antonini SR
Lett Appl Microbiol; 2015 Mar; 60(3):248-58. PubMed ID: 25421952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Distribution of Dekkera bruxellensis in a sugarcane-based fuel ethanol fermentation plant.
da Silva TC; Leite FC; De Morais MA
Lett Appl Microbiol; 2016 Apr; 62(4):354-8. PubMed ID: 26928357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The fermentation of sugarcane molasses by Dekkera bruxellensis and the mobilization of reserve carbohydrates.
Pereira LF; Lucatti E; Basso LC; de Morais MA
Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek; 2014 Mar; 105(3):481-9. PubMed ID: 24370978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Volatile phenols are produced by strains of Dekkera bruxellensis under Brazilian fuel ethanol industry-like conditions.
Silva LFL; Réco AS; Peña R; Ganga MA; Ceccato-Antonini SR
FEMS Microbiol Lett; 2018 Nov; 365(21):. PubMed ID: 30239698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Homo- and heterofermentative lactobacilli differently affect sugarcane-based fuel ethanol fermentation.
Basso TO; Gomes FS; Lopes ML; de Amorim HV; Eggleston G; Basso LC
Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek; 2014 Jan; 105(1):169-77. PubMed ID: 24198118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The ability to use nitrate confers advantage to Dekkera bruxellensis over S. cerevisiae and can explain its adaptation to industrial fermentation processes.
de Barros Pita W; Leite FC; de Souza Liberal AT; Simões DA; de Morais MA
Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek; 2011 Jun; 100(1):99-107. PubMed ID: 21350883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Fermentation of lignocellulosic hydrolysate by the alternative industrial ethanol yeast Dekkera bruxellensis.
Blomqvist J; South E; Tiukova I; Momeni MH; Hansson H; Ståhlberg J; Horn SJ; Schnürer J; Passoth V
Lett Appl Microbiol; 2011 Jul; 53(1):73-8. PubMed ID: 21535044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Dekkera bruxellensis and Lactobacillus vini form a stable ethanol-producing consortium in a commercial alcohol production process.
Passoth V; Blomqvist J; Schnürer J
Appl Environ Microbiol; 2007 Jul; 73(13):4354-6. PubMed ID: 17483277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Microbial contamination of fuel ethanol fermentations.
Beckner M; Ivey ML; Phister TG
Lett Appl Microbiol; 2011 Oct; 53(4):387-94. PubMed ID: 21770989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Interaction of 4-ethylphenol, pH, sucrose and ethanol on the growth and fermentation capacity of the industrial strain of Saccharomyces cerevisiae PE-2.
Covre EA; Silva LFL; Bastos RG; Ceccato-Antonini SR
World J Microbiol Biotechnol; 2019 Aug; 35(9):136. PubMed ID: 31432249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Biocontrol of Brettanomyces/Dekkera bruxellensis in alcoholic fermentations using saccharomycin-overproducing Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains.
Branco P; Sabir F; Diniz M; Carvalho L; Albergaria H; Prista C
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2019 Apr; 103(7):3073-3083. PubMed ID: 30734124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Fermentation characteristics of Dekkera bruxellensis strains.
Blomqvist J; Eberhard T; Schnürer J; Passoth V
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2010 Jul; 87(4):1487-97. PubMed ID: 20437232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Nutritional requirements for Lactobacillus vini growth in sugarcane derivative substrate of ethanol fermentation.
da Silva PKN; Mendonça AA; de Miranda AR; Calazans TLS; de Souza RB; de Morais MA
FEMS Microbiol Lett; 2019 Aug; 366(16):. PubMed ID: 31566701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Transcriptome of the alternative ethanol production strain Dekkera bruxellensis CBS 11270 in sugar limited, low oxygen cultivation.
Tiukova IA; Petterson ME; Tellgren-Roth C; Bunikis I; Eberhard T; Pettersson OV; Passoth V
PLoS One; 2013; 8(3):e58455. PubMed ID: 23516483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
