These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

71 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22843033)

  • 1. Knowledge, attitudes and behavioral intentions of agricultural professionals toward genetically modified (GM) foods: a case study in Southwest Iran.
    Ghasemi S; Karami E; Azadi H
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2013 Sep; 19(3):1201-27. PubMed ID: 22843033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Belgian dietitians' knowledge, perceptions and willingness-to-recommend of genetically modified food and organisms.
    De Mesmaeker M; Tran D; Verbeecke V; Ameye F; Dubaere P; Strobbe S; Van Der Straeten D; De Steur H
    J Hum Nutr Diet; 2024 Feb; 37(1):142-154. PubMed ID: 37751474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. U.S. consumer support for genetically modified foods: Time trends and assessments of four GM attributes.
    Kolodinsky J; Rose N; Danielsen J
    GM Crops Food; 2023 Dec; 14(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 37979149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Investigating the status of transgenic crops in Iran in terms of cultivation, consumption, laws and rights in comparison with the world.
    Baghbani-Arani A; Poureisa M; Alekajbaf H; Borz-Abad RK; Khodadadi-Dashtaki K
    Sci Rep; 2021 Apr; 11(1):9204. PubMed ID: 33911171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Determinants of public attitudes to genetically modified salmon.
    Amin L; Azad MA; Gausmian MH; Zulkifli F
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(1):e86174. PubMed ID: 24489695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A review on regulatory aspects, challenges and public perception in acceptance of genetically modified foods.
    Naveen AK; Sontakke M
    Food Sci Biotechnol; 2024 Mar; 33(4):791-804. PubMed ID: 38371681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of graphical presentation of benefits on cognitive judgments induced by affect heuristic: Focusing on the acceptance of genetically modified foods.
    Nagaya K; Shimizu H
    Appetite; 2023 Mar; 182():106450. PubMed ID: 36632936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. GM trust shaped by trust determinants with the impact of risk/benefit framework: the contingent role of food technology neophobia.
    Ali S; Nawaz MA; Ghufran M; Hussain SN; Hussein Mohammed AS
    GM Crops Food; 2021 Jan; 12(1):170-191. PubMed ID: 33356819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Genetically Modified Foods: A Brief Overview of the Risk Assessment Process.
    Finkelstein PE
    GM Crops Food; 2016 Feb; ():0. PubMed ID: 26891413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Deconstruction of science hegemony: discursive strategies of Chinese science communication on genetically modified foods.
    Lin J
    GM Crops Food; 2023 Dec; 14(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 37598379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The role of skill development in improving the performance of agricultural extension agents in Iran using structural equation modeling and grounded theory.
    Tayouri M; Hosseini SJF; Sabori MS
    Braz J Biol; 2023; 83():e275161. PubMed ID: 37851776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Awareness of GMOs in terms of the Iran biosafety act: A case study of Tehran city.
    Shooshtari A; Hajatpour Z; Ghaffari MR; Seraji F; Loni F
    Heliyon; 2024 Feb; 10(3):e25487. PubMed ID: 38352779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Personal and Professional Mitigation Behavioral Intentions of Agricultural Experts to Address Climate Change.
    Zobeidi T; Yazdanpanah M; Warner LA; Lamm A; Löhr K; Sieber S
    Environ Manage; 2023 Aug; 72(2):396-409. PubMed ID: 37010554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Managers' attitudes toward gene-editing technology and companies' R&D investment in gene-editing: the case of Chinese seed companies.
    Kang Y; Deng H; Pray C; Hu R
    GM Crops Food; 2022 Dec; 13(1):309-326. PubMed ID: 36382611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Modeling antecedent factors involved in behavioral intention towards technology application of genetically modified crops.
    Safi Sis Y; Rezaei A; Karimi H; Ataei P
    GM Crops Food; 2022 Dec; 13(1):50-64. PubMed ID: 35379067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The moderating effect of information channel on the relationship between type of information search and knowledge of genetically modified organisms.
    Nam SJ; Lee B
    GM Crops Food; 2022 Dec; 13(1):26-37. PubMed ID: 35094657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Consumer intention to purchase GM soybean oil in China: effects of information consistency and source credibility.
    Zhang M; Chen Z; Fan Y; Cheng Z; Lv T; Chen Y
    GM Crops Food; 2021 Jan; 12(1):520-534. PubMed ID: 34979863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Determinants of stakeholders' intention to adopt pharmacogenomic.
    Mustapa MAC; Amin L; Mahadi Z
    Pharmacogenomics J; 2020 Dec; 20(6):801-812. PubMed ID: 32457399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Examining Personal and Media Factors Associated with Attitude towards Genetically Modified Foods among University Students in Kunming, China.
    Li L; Bautista JR
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2019 Nov; 16(23):. PubMed ID: 31757100
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The psychological perspective on the adoption of approved genetically modified crops in the presence of acceptability constraint: the contingent role of passion.
    Ali S; Ghufran M; Nawaz MA; Hussain SN
    GM Crops Food; 2019; 10(4):220-237. PubMed ID: 31684804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.