161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22844141)
1. Increasing accurate preference assessment implementation through pyramidal training.
Pence ST; St Peter CC; Tetreault AS
J Appl Behav Anal; 2012; 45(2):345-59. PubMed ID: 22844141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of an efficient method for training staff to implement stimulus preference assessments.
Roscoe EM; Fisher WW
J Appl Behav Anal; 2008; 41(2):249-54. PubMed ID: 18595289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Further evaluation of a brief, intensive teacher-training model.
Lerman DC; Tetreault A; Hovanetz A; Strobel M; Garro J
J Appl Behav Anal; 2008; 41(2):243-8. PubMed ID: 18595288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Training staff to implement brief stimulus preference assessments.
Weldy CR; Rapp JT; Capocasa K
J Appl Behav Anal; 2014; 47(1):214-8. PubMed ID: 24452818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Teacher report and direct assessment of preferences for identifying reinforcers for young children.
Cote CA; Thompson RH; Hanley GP; McKerchar PM
J Appl Behav Anal; 2007; 40(1):157-66. PubMed ID: 17471799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of a self-instruction package for conducting stimulus preference assessments.
Graff RB; Karsten AM
J Appl Behav Anal; 2012; 45(1):69-82. PubMed ID: 22403450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Preference assessment training via self-instruction: A replication and extension.
Shapiro M; Kazemi E; Pogosjana M; Rios D; Mendoza M
J Appl Behav Anal; 2016 Dec; 49(4):794-808. PubMed ID: 27529830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. An evaluation of video modeling with embedded instructions to teach implementation of stimulus preference assessments.
Rosales R; Gongola L; Homlitas C
J Appl Behav Anal; 2015; 48(1):209-14. PubMed ID: 25927112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Programming generalization of in-class transition skills: teaching preschoolers with developmental delays to self-assess and recruit contingent teacher praise.
Connell MC; Carta JJ; Baer DM
J Appl Behav Anal; 1993; 26(3):345-52. PubMed ID: 7691788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Training teachers in generalized writing of behavior modification programs for multihandicapped deaf children.
Hundert J
J Appl Behav Anal; 1982; 15(1):111-22. PubMed ID: 6212568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of the rate of problem behavior maintained by different reinforcers across preference assessments.
Kang S; O'Reilly MF; Fragale CL; Aguilar JM; Rispoli M; Lang R
J Appl Behav Anal; 2011; 44(4):835-46. PubMed ID: 22219533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Increasing the efficiency of paired-stimulus preference assessments by identifying categories of preference.
Ciccone FJ; Graff RB; Ahearn WH
J Appl Behav Anal; 2015; 48(1):221-6. PubMed ID: 25754896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Selection and Implementation of Skill Acquisition Programs by Special Education Teachers and Staff for Students With Autism Spectrum Disorder.
Kodak T; Cariveau T; LeBlanc BA; Mahon JJ; Carroll RA
Behav Modif; 2018 Jan; 42(1):58-83. PubMed ID: 29199447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Training staff to conduct a paired-stimulus preference assessment.
Lavie T; Sturmey P
J Appl Behav Anal; 2002; 35(2):209-11. PubMed ID: 12102143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A demonstration of individual preference for novel mands during functional communication training.
Winborn-Kemmerer L; Ringdahl JE; Wacker DP; Kitsukawa K
J Appl Behav Anal; 2009; 42(1):185-9. PubMed ID: 19721740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Examination of relative reinforcement effects of stimuli identified through pretreatment and daily brief preference assessments.
DeLeon IG; Fisher WW; Rodriguez-Catter V; Maglieri K; Herman K; Marhefka JM
J Appl Behav Anal; 2001; 34(4):463-73. PubMed ID: 11800185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Generalization procedures in training interventionists for individuals with developmental disabilities.
Gianoumis S; Sturmey P
Behav Modif; 2012 Sep; 36(5):619-29. PubMed ID: 22253289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. An evaluation of a stimulus preference assessment of auditory stimuli for adolescents with developmental disabilities.
Horrocks E; Higbee TS
Res Dev Disabil; 2008; 29(1):11-20. PubMed ID: 17097267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of absolute and relative reinforcer value using progressive-ratio schedules.
Francisco MT; Borrero JC; Sy JR
J Appl Behav Anal; 2008; 41(2):189-202. PubMed ID: 18595283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparison of paired- and multiple-stimulus-without-replacement preference assessments to identify reinforcers for dog behavior.
Payne SW; Fulgencio CT; Aniga RN
J Exp Anal Behav; 2023 Jul; 120(1):78-90. PubMed ID: 37199306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
