These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22845064)

  • 1. What's learned together stays together: speakers' choice of referring expression reflects shared experience.
    Gorman KS; Gegg-Harrison W; Marsh CR; Tanenhaus MK
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 May; 39(3):843-53. PubMed ID: 22845064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. What's in a Name? Interlocutors Dynamically Update Expectations about Shared Names.
    Gegg-Harrison WM; Tanenhaus MK
    Front Psychol; 2016; 7():212. PubMed ID: 26955361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. To name or to describe: shared knowledge affects referential form.
    Heller D; Gorman KS; Tanenhaus MK
    Top Cogn Sci; 2012 Apr; 4(2):290-305. PubMed ID: 22389094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Conversation and convention: enduring influences on name choice for common objects.
    Malt BC; Sloman SA
    Mem Cognit; 2004 Dec; 32(8):1346-54. PubMed ID: 15900928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Planning and coordination of utterances in a joint naming task.
    Hoedemaker RS; Meyer AS
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Apr; 45(4):732-752. PubMed ID: 29999401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Compensating for an Inattentive Audience.
    Craycraft NN; Brown-Schmidt S
    Cogn Sci; 2018 May; ():. PubMed ID: 29781130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Collaboration under uncertainty in unscripted conversations: The role of hedges.
    Dahan D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2023 Feb; 49(2):320-334. PubMed ID: 36757986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. What is retained about common ground? Distinct effects of linguistic and visual co-presence.
    Galati A; Brennan SE
    Cognition; 2021 Oct; 215():104809. PubMed ID: 34274558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Don't talk about pink elephants! Speaker's control over leaking private information during language production.
    Lane LW; Groisman M; Ferreira VS
    Psychol Sci; 2006 Apr; 17(4):273-7. PubMed ID: 16623681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Speaker-external versus speaker-internal forces on utterance form: do cognitive demands override threats to referential success?
    Lane LW; Ferreira VS
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Nov; 34(6):1466-81. PubMed ID: 18980408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. What's New to You? Preschoolers' Partner-Specific Online Processing of Disfluency.
    Yoon SO; Jin KS; Brown-Schmidt S; Fisher CL
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():612601. PubMed ID: 33488480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Speakers Align With Their Partner's Overspecification During Interaction.
    Loy JE; Smith K
    Cogn Sci; 2021 Dec; 45(12):e13065. PubMed ID: 34913502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. How Cognitive Load Influences Speakers' Choice of Referring Expressions.
    Vogels J; Krahmer E; Maes A
    Cogn Sci; 2015 Aug; 39(6):1396-418. PubMed ID: 25471259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Which words are activated during bilingual word production?
    Colomé A; Miozzo M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Jan; 36(1):96-109. PubMed ID: 20053047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Producing pronouns and definite noun phrases: do speakers use the addressee's discourse model?
    Fukumura K; van Gompel RP
    Cogn Sci; 2012; 36(7):1289-311. PubMed ID: 22671693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Age differences in memory for names: the effect of prelearned semantic associations.
    Old SR; Naveh-Benjamin M
    Psychol Aging; 2012 Jun; 27(2):462-73. PubMed ID: 21895378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Influence of perspective and goals on reference production in conversation.
    Yoon SO; Koh S; Brown-Schmidt S
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2012 Aug; 19(4):699-707. PubMed ID: 22572985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Incremental learning in word production: Tracing the fate of non-selected alternative picture names.
    Kurtz F; Schriefers H; Mädebach A; Jescheniak JD
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 Oct; 44(10):1586-1602. PubMed ID: 29975094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Naming of newly learned objects: a PET activation study.
    Grönholm P; Rinne JO; Vorobyev V; Laine M
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Sep; 25(1):359-71. PubMed ID: 16095887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Border collie comprehends object names as verbal referents.
    Pilley JW; Reid AK
    Behav Processes; 2011 Feb; 86(2):184-95. PubMed ID: 21145379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.