219 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22846230)
1. Effectiveness of genomic prediction on milk flow traits in dairy cattle.
Gray KA; Cassady JP; Huang Y; Maltecca C
Genet Sel Evol; 2012 Jul; 44(1):24. PubMed ID: 22846230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Estimates of marker effects for measures of milk flow in the Italian brown Swiss dairy cattle population.
Gray KA; Maltecca C; Bagnato A; Dolezal M; Rossoni A; Samore AB; Cassady JP
BMC Vet Res; 2012 Oct; 8():199. PubMed ID: 23092401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Value of sharing cow reference population between countries on reliability of genomic prediction for milk yield traits.
Haile-Mariam M; MacLeod IM; Bolormaa S; Schrooten C; O'Connor E; de Jong G; Daetwyler HD; Pryce JE
J Dairy Sci; 2020 Feb; 103(2):1711-1728. PubMed ID: 31864746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Genomic-based genetic parameters for milkability traits derived from automatic milking systems in North American Holstein cattle.
Pedrosa VB; Boerman JP; Gloria LS; Chen SY; Montes ME; Doucette JS; Brito LF
J Dairy Sci; 2023 Apr; 106(4):2613-2629. PubMed ID: 36797177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Joint genomic evaluation of French dairy cattle breeds using multiple-trait models.
Karoui S; Carabaño MJ; Díaz C; Legarra A
Genet Sel Evol; 2012 Dec; 44(1):39. PubMed ID: 23216664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Genomic prediction of milk-production traits and somatic cell score using single-step genomic best linear unbiased predictor with random regression test-day model in Thai dairy cattle.
Buaban S; Prempree S; Sumreddee P; Duangjinda M; Masuda Y
J Dairy Sci; 2021 Dec; 104(12):12713-12723. PubMed ID: 34538484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Short communication: Reliability of single-step genomic BLUP breeding values by multi-trait test-day model analysis.
Bauer J; Přibyl J; Vostrý L
J Dairy Sci; 2015 Jul; 98(7):4999-5003. PubMed ID: 25935244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Inclusion of cow records in genomic evaluations and impact on bias due to preferential treatment.
Dassonneville R; Baur A; Fritz S; Boichard D; Ducrocq V
Genet Sel Evol; 2012 Dec; 44(1):40. PubMed ID: 23270502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Genomic analysis of dominance effects on milk production and conformation traits in Fleckvieh cattle.
Ertl J; Legarra A; Vitezica ZG; Varona L; Edel C; Emmerling R; Götz KU
Genet Sel Evol; 2014 Jun; 46(1):40. PubMed ID: 24962065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Genetic parameter estimates for milkability traits and their relationship with somatic cell score in South African Holstein cattle.
Tshilate TS; Bhebhe E; Dube B; Rhode C; Mapholi NO; Matika O; Banga CB
Trop Anim Health Prod; 2020 Nov; 53(1):18. PubMed ID: 33216226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Genetic evaluations for measures of the milk-flow curve in the Italian Brown Swiss population.
Gray KA; Vacirca F; Bagnato A; Samoré AB; Rossoni A; Maltecca C
J Dairy Sci; 2011 Feb; 94(2):960-70. PubMed ID: 21257064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Genomic information allows for more accurate breeding values for milkability in dual-purpose Italian Simmental cattle.
Cesarani A; Garcia A; Hidalgo J; Degano L; Vicario D; Macciotta NPP; Lourenco D
J Dairy Sci; 2021 May; 104(5):5719-5727. PubMed ID: 33612221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Application of single-step genomic evaluation using multiple-trait random regression test-day models in dairy cattle.
Oliveira HR; Lourenco DAL; Masuda Y; Misztal I; Tsuruta S; Jamrozik J; Brito LF; Silva FF; Schenkel FS
J Dairy Sci; 2019 Mar; 102(3):2365-2377. PubMed ID: 30638992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Accuracy of genomic prediction for milk production traits in the Chinese Holstein population using a reference population consisting of cows.
Ding X; Zhang Z; Li X; Wang S; Wu X; Sun D; Yu Y; Liu J; Wang Y; Zhang Y; Zhang S; Zhang Y; Zhang Q
J Dairy Sci; 2013 Aug; 96(8):5315-23. PubMed ID: 23746588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Accounting for dominance to improve genomic evaluations of dairy cows for fertility and milk production traits.
Aliloo H; Pryce JE; González-Recio O; Cocks BG; Hayes BJ
Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Feb; 48():8. PubMed ID: 26830030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparison of five methods to predict genomic breeding values of dairy bulls from genome-wide SNP markers.
Moser G; Tier B; Crump RE; Khatkar MS; Raadsma HW
Genet Sel Evol; 2009 Dec; 41(1):56. PubMed ID: 20043835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Differing genetic trend estimates from traditional and genomic evaluations of genotyped animals as evidence of preselection bias in US Holsteins.
Masuda Y; VanRaden PM; Misztal I; Lawlor TJ
J Dairy Sci; 2018 Jun; 101(6):5194-5206. PubMed ID: 29573806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of genomic predictions for lowly heritable traits using multi-step and single-step genomic best linear unbiased predictor in Holstein cattle.
Guarini AR; Lourenco DAL; Brito LF; Sargolzaei M; Baes CF; Miglior F; Misztal I; Schenkel FS
J Dairy Sci; 2018 Sep; 101(9):8076-8086. PubMed ID: 29935829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Accuracies of breeding values for dry matter intake using nongenotyped animals and predictor traits in different lactations.
Manzanilla-Pech CIV; Veerkamp RF; de Haas Y; Calus MPL; Ten Napel J
J Dairy Sci; 2017 Nov; 100(11):9103-9114. PubMed ID: 28865857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Contribution of domestic production records, Interbull estimated breeding values, and single nucleotide polymorphism genetic markers to the single-step genomic evaluation of milk production.
Přibyl J; Madsen P; Bauer J; Přibylová J; Simečková M; Vostrý L; Zavadilová L
J Dairy Sci; 2013 Mar; 96(3):1865-73. PubMed ID: 23312993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
