374 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22846661)
1. Storage conditions of intestinal microbiota matter in metagenomic analysis.
Cardona S; Eck A; Cassellas M; Gallart M; Alastrue C; Dore J; Azpiroz F; Roca J; Guarner F; Manichanh C
BMC Microbiol; 2012 Jul; 12():158. PubMed ID: 22846661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of stool versus rectal swab samples and storage conditions on bacterial community profiles.
Bassis CM; Moore NM; Lolans K; Seekatz AM; Weinstein RA; Young VB; Hayden MK;
BMC Microbiol; 2017 Mar; 17(1):78. PubMed ID: 28359329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Characterization of the fecal microbiota using high-throughput sequencing reveals a stable microbial community during storage.
Carroll IM; Ringel-Kulka T; Siddle JP; Klaenhammer TR; Ringel Y
PLoS One; 2012; 7(10):e46953. PubMed ID: 23071673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of methods for fecal microbiome biospecimen collection.
Dominianni C; Wu J; Hayes RB; Ahn J
BMC Microbiol; 2014 Apr; 14():103. PubMed ID: 24758293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of storage conditions on the assessment of bacterial community structure in soil and human-associated samples.
Lauber CL; Zhou N; Gordon JI; Knight R; Fierer N
FEMS Microbiol Lett; 2010 Jun; 307(1):80-6. PubMed ID: 20412303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of Fecal Collection Methods on Variation in Gut Metagenomics and Untargeted Metabolomics.
Guan H; Pu Y; Liu C; Lou T; Tan S; Kong M; Sun Z; Mei Z; Qi Q; Quan Z; Zhao G; Zheng Y
mSphere; 2021 Oct; 6(5):e0063621. PubMed ID: 34523982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Processing faecal samples: a step forward for standards in microbial community analysis.
Santiago A; Panda S; Mengels G; Martinez X; Azpiroz F; Dore J; Guarner F; Manichanh C
BMC Microbiol; 2014 May; 14():112. PubMed ID: 24884524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Sampling and pyrosequencing methods for characterizing bacterial communities in the human gut using 16S sequence tags.
Wu GD; Lewis JD; Hoffmann C; Chen YY; Knight R; Bittinger K; Hwang J; Chen J; Berkowsky R; Nessel L; Li H; Bushman FD
BMC Microbiol; 2010 Jul; 10():206. PubMed ID: 20673359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Ionic liquid-based reagents improve the stability of midterm fecal sample storage.
Hao L; Xia Z; Yang H; Wang J; Han M
J Microbiol Methods; 2017 Aug; 139():68-73. PubMed ID: 28506638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of DNA stabilizers and storage conditions on preserving fecal microbiota profiles.
Chen CC; Wu WK; Chang CM; Panyod S; Lu TP; Liou JM; Fang YJ; Chuang EY; Wu MS
J Formos Med Assoc; 2020 Dec; 119(12):1791-1798. PubMed ID: 32111519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of Methods To Collect Fecal Samples for Microbiome Studies Using Whole-Genome Shotgun Metagenomic Sequencing.
Byrd DA; Sinha R; Hoffman KL; Chen J; Hua X; Shi J; Chia N; Petrosino J; Vogtmann E
mSphere; 2020 Feb; 5(1):. PubMed ID: 32250964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Reliability of a participant-friendly fecal collection method for microbiome analyses: a step towards large sample size investigation.
Szopinska JW; Gresse R; van der Marel S; Boekhorst J; Lukovac S; van Swam I; Franke B; Timmerman H; Belzer C; Arias Vasquez A
BMC Microbiol; 2018 Sep; 18(1):110. PubMed ID: 30189859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. High-throughput DNA sequence analysis reveals stable engraftment of gut microbiota following transplantation of previously frozen fecal bacteria.
Hamilton MJ; Weingarden AR; Unno T; Khoruts A; Sadowsky MJ
Gut Microbes; 2013; 4(2):125-35. PubMed ID: 23333862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of room temperature transport vials on DNA quality and phylogenetic composition of faecal microbiota of elderly adults and infants.
Hill CJ; Brown JR; Lynch DB; Jeffery IB; Ryan CA; Ross RP; Stanton C; O'Toole PW
Microbiome; 2016 May; 4(1):19. PubMed ID: 27160322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of Fecal Collection Methods for Microbiome and Metabolomics Studies.
Wang Z; Zolnik CP; Qiu Y; Usyk M; Wang T; Strickler HD; Isasi CR; Kaplan RC; Kurland IJ; Qi Q; Burk RD
Front Cell Infect Microbiol; 2018; 8():301. PubMed ID: 30234027
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Collection of non-meconium stool on fecal occult blood cards is an effective method for fecal microbiota studies in infants.
Wong WSW; Clemency N; Klein E; Provenzano M; Iyer R; Niederhuber JE; Hourigan SK
Microbiome; 2017 Sep; 5(1):114. PubMed ID: 28870234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Systematic Analysis of Impact of Sampling Regions and Storage Methods on Fecal Gut Microbiome and Metabolome Profiles.
Liang Y; Dong T; Chen M; He L; Wang T; Liu X; Chang H; Mao JH; Hang B; Snijders AM; Xia Y
mSphere; 2020 Jan; 5(1):. PubMed ID: 31915218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Impact of fecal sample preservation and handling techniques on the canine fecal microbiota profile.
Chiu O; Gomez DE; Obrego D; Dunfield K; MacNicol JL; Liversidge B; Verbrugghe A
PLoS One; 2024; 19(1):e0292731. PubMed ID: 38285680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Fecal microbiome composition and diversity of cryopreserved canine stool at different duration and storage conditions.
Barko P; Nguyen-Edquilang J; Williams DA; Gal A
PLoS One; 2024; 19(2):e0294730. PubMed ID: 38324560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Semi-automated extraction of microbial DNA from feces for qPCR and phylogenetic microarray analysis.
Nylund L; Heilig HG; Salminen S; de Vos WM; Satokari R
J Microbiol Methods; 2010 Nov; 83(2):231-5. PubMed ID: 20849891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
