These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22846767)

  • 1. Effects of individual sound sources on the subjective loudness and acoustic comfort in underground shopping streets.
    Kang J; Meng Q; Jin H
    Sci Total Environ; 2012 Oct; 435-436():80-9. PubMed ID: 22846767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The influence of crowd density on the sound environment of commercial pedestrian streets.
    Meng Q; Kang J
    Sci Total Environ; 2015 Apr; 511():249-58. PubMed ID: 25546463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of temporary open-air markets on the sound environment and acoustic perception based on the crowd density characteristics.
    Meng Q; Sun Y; Kang J
    Sci Total Environ; 2017 Dec; 601-602():1488-1495. PubMed ID: 28605866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Influence of social and behavioural characteristics of users on their evaluation of subjective loudness and acoustic comfort in shopping malls.
    Meng Q; Kang J
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(1):e54497. PubMed ID: 23336003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of social, demographical and behavioral factors on the sound level evaluation in urban open spaces.
    Yu L; Kang J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Feb; 123(2):772-83. PubMed ID: 18247882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of sound-related activities on human behaviours and acoustic comfort in urban open spaces.
    Meng Q; Kang J
    Sci Total Environ; 2016 Dec; 573():481-493. PubMed ID: 27572540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluating standard airborne sound insulation measures in terms of annoyance, loudness, and audibility ratings.
    Park HK; Bradley JS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Jul; 126(1):208-19. PubMed ID: 19603878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluating signal-to-noise ratios, loudness, and related measures as indicators of airborne sound insulation.
    Park HK; Bradley JS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Sep; 126(3):1219-30. PubMed ID: 19739735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Disentangling preference ratings of concert hall acoustics using subjective sensory profiles.
    Lokki T; Pätynen J; Kuusinen A; Tervo S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Nov; 132(5):3148-61. PubMed ID: 23145600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Modeling subjective evaluation of soundscape quality in urban open spaces: An artificial neural network approach.
    Yu L; Kang J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Sep; 126(3):1163-74. PubMed ID: 19739730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Loudness perception of low tones undergoing partial masking by higher tones in orchestral music in concert halls.
    Nishihara N; Hidaka T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Aug; 132(2):799-803. PubMed ID: 22894202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Quality and loudness judgments for music subjected to compression limiting.
    Croghan NB; Arehart KH; Kates JM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Aug; 132(2):1177-88. PubMed ID: 22894236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of loudness on the reverberance of music: reverberance prediction using loudness models.
    Lee D; Cabrera D; Martens WL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Feb; 131(2):1194-205. PubMed ID: 22352494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Individual differences in the biomechanical effect of loudness and tempo on upper-limb movements during repetitive piano keystrokes.
    Furuya S; Aoki T; Nakahara H; Kinoshita H
    Hum Mov Sci; 2012 Feb; 31(1):26-39. PubMed ID: 21816497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Perception of urban park soundscape.
    Tse MS; Chau CK; Choy YS; Tsui WK; Chan CN; Tang SK
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Apr; 131(4):2762-71. PubMed ID: 22501055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Subjective and objective evaluations of a scattered sound field in a scale model opera house.
    Ryu JK; Jeon JY
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Sep; 124(3):1538-49. PubMed ID: 19045645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Loudness change in response to dynamic acoustic intensity.
    Olsen KN; Stevens CJ; Tardieu J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Dec; 36(6):1631-44. PubMed ID: 20822303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Feasibility of an objective electrophysiological loudness scaling: a kernel-based novelty detection approach.
    Mariam M; Delb W; Schick B; Strauss DJ
    Artif Intell Med; 2012 Jul; 55(3):185-95. PubMed ID: 22592125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Subjective loudness level measurements and equal loudness contours in a bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops truncatus).
    Finneran JJ; Schlundt CE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Nov; 130(5):3124-36. PubMed ID: 22087941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Objective and subjective evaluation of the acoustic comfort in classrooms.
    Zannin PH; Marcon CR
    Appl Ergon; 2007 Sep; 38(5):675-80. PubMed ID: 17202022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.