271 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22847119)
1. Intraoperative imprint cytology and frozen section pathology for margin assessment in breast conservation surgery: a systematic review.
Esbona K; Li Z; Wilke LG
Ann Surg Oncol; 2012 Oct; 19(10):3236-45. PubMed ID: 22847119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Is frozen section analysis of reexcision lumpectomy margins worthwhile? Margin analysis in breast reexcisions.
Sauter ER; Hoffman JP; Ottery FD; Kowalyshyn MJ; Litwin S; Eisenberg BL
Cancer; 1994 May; 73(10):2607-12. PubMed ID: 8174059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of Intraoperative Imprint Cytology Followed by Frozen Section on Margin Assessment in Breast-Conserving Surgery.
Tamanuki T; Namura M; Aoyagi T; Shimizu S; Suwa T; Matsuzaki H
Ann Surg Oncol; 2021 Mar; 28(3):1338-1346. PubMed ID: 32815080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Accuracy of frozen section analysis versus specimen radiography during breast-conserving surgery for nonpalpable lesions.
Weber WP; Engelberger S; Viehl CT; Zanetti-Dallenbach R; Kuster S; Dirnhofer S; Wruk D; Oertli D; Marti WR
World J Surg; 2008 Dec; 32(12):2599-606. PubMed ID: 18836763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Role of frozen section in the intra-operative margin assessment during breast conserving surgery.
Anila KR; Chandramohan K; Mathews A; Somanathan T; Jayasree K
Indian J Cancer; 2016; 53(2):235-238. PubMed ID: 28071617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The role of frozen section analysis of margins during breast conservation surgery.
Weber S; Storm FK; Stitt J; Mahvi DM
Cancer J Sci Am; 1997; 3(5):273-7. PubMed ID: 9327150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Frozen section analysis for intraoperative margin assessment during breast-conserving surgery results in low rates of re-excision and local recurrence.
Olson TP; Harter J; Muñoz A; Mahvi DM; Breslin T
Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Oct; 14(10):2953-60. PubMed ID: 17674109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The impact of intraoperative cavity shaving on re-excision rates in breast-conserving surgery.
Ilhan B; Bademler S; Kılıç B; Onder S; Karanlık H
J Surg Oncol; 2023 Mar; 127(4):527-534. PubMed ID: 36434747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Efficacy of intraoperative entire-circumferential frozen section analysis of lumpectomy margins during breast-conserving surgery for breast cancer.
Osako T; Nishimura R; Nishiyama Y; Okumura Y; Tashima R; Nakano M; Fujisue M; Toyozumi Y; Arima N
Int J Clin Oncol; 2015 Dec; 20(6):1093-101. PubMed ID: 25855313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessing Resection Margin Status in Breast-conserving Surgery Specimens: Comparison Among Gross Evaluation, Frozen Section Analysis, and Permanent Section Diagnosis in 725 Patients With Breast Cancer.
DO J; Chu J; Ahn J; Bae GE; Lee SH; Kim HS; DO SI
Anticancer Res; 2022 Sep; 42(9):4453-4460. PubMed ID: 36039453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Accuracy of intraoperative frozen-section analysis of breast cancer lumpectomy-bed margins.
Cendán JC; Coco D; Copeland EM
J Am Coll Surg; 2005 Aug; 201(2):194-8. PubMed ID: 16038815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Intraoperative imprint cytology for real-time assessment of surgical margins during partial nephrectomy: A comparison with frozen section.
Özsoy M; Klatte T; Wiener H; Siller-Matula J; Schmidbauer J
Urol Oncol; 2015 Feb; 33(2):67.e25-9. PubMed ID: 25176582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Accuracy of Frozen Section Analysis of Urethral and Ureteral Margins During Radical Cystectomy for Bladder Cancer: A Systematic Review and Diagnostic Meta-Analysis.
Laukhtina E; Rajwa P; Mori K; Moschini M; D'Andrea D; Abufaraj M; Soria F; Mari A; Krajewski W; Albisinni S; Teoh JY; Quhal F; Sari Motlagh R; Mostafaei H; Katayama S; Grossmann NC; Enikeev D; Zimmermann K; Fajkovic H; Glybochko P; Shariat SF; Pradere B;
Eur Urol Focus; 2022 May; 8(3):752-760. PubMed ID: 34127436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Accuracy of intraoperative gross examination of surgical margin status in women undergoing partial mastectomy for breast malignancy.
Balch GC; Mithani SK; Simpson JF; Kelley MC
Am Surg; 2005 Jan; 71(1):22-7; discussion 27-8. PubMed ID: 15757052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of Intraoperative Imprint Cytology versus Frozen Section for Sentinel Lymph Node Evaluation in Breast Cancer. A study along with Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of literature.
Ahuja S; Yadav P; Fattahi-Darghlou M; Zaheer S
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2024 Apr; 25(4):1113-1119. PubMed ID: 38679970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Interoperative frozen section for margin assessment in breast conserving energy.
Dener C; Inan A; Sen M; Demirci S
Scand J Surg; 2009; 98(1):34-40. PubMed ID: 19459270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The impact of routine frozen section analysis during nephroureterectomy or segmental ureterectomy for urothelial carcinoma on final surgical margin status and long-term oncologic outcome.
Lima W; Wang Y; Miyamoto H
Urol Oncol; 2023 Aug; 41(8):357.e1-357.e9. PubMed ID: 37142451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The impact of routine frozen section analysis during partial cystectomy for bladder cancer on surgical margin status and long-term oncologic outcome.
Sharma M; Nagata Y; Yang Z; Miyamoto H
Urol Oncol; 2020 Dec; 38(12):933.e1-933.e6. PubMed ID: 32389427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Role for intraoperative margin assessment in patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery.
Cabioglu N; Hunt KK; Sahin AA; Kuerer HM; Babiera GV; Singletary SE; Whitman GJ; Ross MI; Ames FC; Feig BW; Buchholz TA; Meric-Bernstam F
Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Apr; 14(4):1458-71. PubMed ID: 17260108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Is intraoperative frozen section analysis of reexcision specimens of value in preventing reoperation in breast-conserving therapy?
Jorns JM; Daignault S; Sabel MS; Wu AJ
Am J Clin Pathol; 2014 Nov; 142(5):601-8. PubMed ID: 25319974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
