271 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22847119)
21. Total-circumference intraoperative frozen section analysis reduces margin-positive rate in breast-conservation surgery.
Fukamachi K; Ishida T; Usami S; Takeda M; Watanabe M; Sasano H; Ohuchi N
Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2010 Jun; 40(6):513-20. PubMed ID: 20189973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Intraoperative frozen section analysis for breast-conserving therapy in 1016 patients with breast cancer.
Riedl O; Fitzal F; Mader N; Dubsky P; Rudas M; Mittlboeck M; Gnant M; Jakesz R
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2009 Mar; 35(3):264-70. PubMed ID: 18706785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of touch imprint cytology and frozen section techniques in detecting breast malignancies.
Ahmed S; Ahmad M
J Pak Med Assoc; 2016 Mar; 66(3):292-5. PubMed ID: 26968279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Minimizing local recurrence after breast conserving therapy using intraoperative shaved margins to determine pathologic tumor clearance.
Camp ER; McAuliffe PF; Gilroy JS; Morris CG; Lind DS; Mendenhall NP; Copeland EM
J Am Coll Surg; 2005 Dec; 201(6):855-61. PubMed ID: 16310688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Intra-operative touch preparation cytology; does it have a role in re-excision lumpectomy?
Valdes EK; Boolbol SK; Cohen JM; Feldman SM
Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Mar; 14(3):1045-50. PubMed ID: 17206481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Intraoperative evaluation of lumpectomy margins by imprint cytology with histologic correlation: a community hospital experience.
Creager AJ; Shaw JA; Young PR; Geisinger KR
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2002 Jul; 126(7):846-8. PubMed ID: 12088456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Lumpectomy margins, reexcision, and local recurrence of breast cancer.
Tartter PI; Kaplan J; Bleiweiss I; Gajdos C; Kong A; Ahmed S; Zapetti D
Am J Surg; 2000 Feb; 179(2):81-5. PubMed ID: 10773138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Improved Rate of Negative Margins for Inflammatory Breast Cancer Using Intraoperative Frozen Section Analysis.
Kong J; Bandyopadhyay S; Chen W; Al-Mufarrej F; Choi L; Kosir MA
Cancers (Basel); 2023 Sep; 15(18):. PubMed ID: 37760566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The role of margin status and reexcision in local recurrence following breast conservation surgery.
Adams BJ; Zoon CK; Stevenson C; Chitnavis P; Wolfe L; Bear HD
Ann Surg Oncol; 2013 Jul; 20(7):2250-5. PubMed ID: 23686015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Can We Do Breast-Conserving Surgery Without Intraoperative Frozen Section of Margin?
Xu D; Wang K; Lin C; Li D; Pan C; Hu K; Chen H; Huang F; Tian W; Chen Y; Pan T
Clin Breast Cancer; 2024 Apr; 24(3):191-198. PubMed ID: 38368247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Accuracy of frozen section in intraoperative margin assessment for breast-conserving surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Garcia MT; Mota BS; Cardoso N; Martimbianco ALC; Ricci MD; Carvalho FM; Gonçalves R; Soares Junior JM; Filassi JR
PLoS One; 2021; 16(3):e0248768. PubMed ID: 33735315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Comparing touch imprint cytology, frozen section analysis, and cytokeratin immunostaining for intraoperative evaluation of axillary sentinel lymph nodes in breast cancer.
Safai A; Razeghi A; Monabati A; Azarpira N; Talei A
Indian J Pathol Microbiol; 2012; 55(2):183-6. PubMed ID: 22771640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Use of imprint cytology for assessment of surgical margins in lumpectomy specimens of breast cancer patients.
Bakhshandeh M; Tutuncuoglu SO; Fischer G; Masood S
Diagn Cytopathol; 2007 Oct; 35(10):656-9. PubMed ID: 17854083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Intraoperative Assessment of Tumor Resection Margins in Breast-Conserving Surgery Using
Grootendorst MR; Cariati M; Pinder SE; Kothari A; Douek M; Kovacs T; Hamed H; Pawa A; Nimmo F; Owen J; Ramalingam V; Sethi S; Mistry S; Vyas K; Tuch DS; Britten A; Van Hemelrijck M; Cook GJ; Sibley-Allen C; Allen S; Purushotham A
J Nucl Med; 2017 Jun; 58(6):891-898. PubMed ID: 27932562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Clinical Impact of Intraoperative Margin Assessment in Breast-Conserving Surgery With a Novel Pegulicianine Fluorescence-Guided System: A Nonrandomized Controlled Trial.
Hwang ES; Beitsch P; Blumencranz P; Carr D; Chagpar A; Clark L; Dekhne N; Dodge D; Dyess DL; Gold L; Grobmyer S; Hunt K; Karp S; Lesnikoski BA; Wapnir I; Smith BL;
JAMA Surg; 2022 Jul; 157(7):573-580. PubMed ID: 35544130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The Accuracy of Sequential Urethral Frozen Section and its Impact on Urethral Recurrence After Radical Cystectomy.
Gakis G; Schmid MA; Hassan F; Stenzl A; Renninger M
Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2022 Oct; 20(5):e390-e395. PubMed ID: 35577732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Low re-excision rate for positive margins in patients treated with ultrasound-guided breast-conserving surgery.
Yu CC; Chiang KC; Kuo WL; Shen SC; Lo YF; Chen SC
Breast; 2013 Oct; 22(5):698-702. PubMed ID: 23333255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Margin Proximity Correlates with Local Recurrence After Mastectomy for Patients Not Receiving Adjuvant Radiotherapy.
Glorioso JM; Gonzalez Juarrero AB; Rodysill BR; Harmsen WS; Habermann EB; Carter JM; Mutter RW; Degnim AC; Jakub JW
Ann Surg Oncol; 2017 Oct; 24(11):3148-3156. PubMed ID: 28681156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Intraoperative margin assessment reduces reexcision rates in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ treated with breast-conserving surgery.
Chagpar A; Yen T; Sahin A; Hunt KK; Whitman GJ; Ames FC; Ross MI; Meric-Bernstam F; Babiera GV; Singletary SE; Kuerer HM
Am J Surg; 2003 Oct; 186(4):371-7. PubMed ID: 14553853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Intraoperative assessment of margins in breast conserving therapy: a systematic review.
Butler-Henderson K; Lee AH; Price RI; Waring K
Breast; 2014 Apr; 23(2):112-9. PubMed ID: 24468464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
