120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22847754)
1. Flexible recalibration of binary clinical prediction models.
Dalton JE
Stat Med; 2013 Jan; 32(2):282-9. PubMed ID: 22847754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Assessment and statistical modeling of the relationship between remotely sensed aerosol optical depth and PM2.5 in the eastern United States.
Paciorek CJ; Liu Y;
Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2012 May; (167):5-83; discussion 85-91. PubMed ID: 22838153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Accuracy of hospital standardized mortality rates: effects of model calibration.
Kipnis P; Liu V; Escobar GJ
Med Care; 2014 Apr; 52(4):378-84. PubMed ID: 24848209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A discussion of calibration techniques for evaluating binary and categorical predictive models.
Fenlon C; O'Grady L; Doherty ML; Dunnion J
Prev Vet Med; 2018 Jan; 149():107-114. PubMed ID: 29290291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Validation and updating of predictive logistic regression models: a study on sample size and shrinkage.
Steyerberg EW; Borsboom GJ; van Houwelingen HC; Eijkemans MJ; Habbema JD
Stat Med; 2004 Aug; 23(16):2567-86. PubMed ID: 15287085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Quantifying prognosis with risk predictions.
Pace NL; Eberhart LH; Kranke PR
Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2012 Jan; 29(1):7-16. PubMed ID: 22089517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Recalibration of risk prediction models in a large multicenter cohort of admissions to adult, general critical care units in the United Kingdom.
Harrison DA; Brady AR; Parry GJ; Carpenter JR; Rowan K
Crit Care Med; 2006 May; 34(5):1378-88. PubMed ID: 16557153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Calibration and validation of multiple regression models for stormwater quality prediction: data partitioning, effect of dataset size and characteristics.
Mourad M; Bertrand-Krajewski JL; Chebbo G
Water Sci Technol; 2005; 52(3):45-52. PubMed ID: 16206843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Pre-operative and intraoperative determinants for prolonged ventilation following adult cardiac surgery.
Widyastuti Y; Stenseth R; Pleym H; Wahba A; Videm V
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2012 Feb; 56(2):190-9. PubMed ID: 22091558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Risk prediction models: recalibration.
Harrison DA; Parry GJ; Rowan K
Crit Care Med; 2007 Jan; 35(1):326-7. PubMed ID: 17197789
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Assessing calibration of multinomial risk prediction models.
Van Hoorde K; Vergouwe Y; Timmerman D; Van Huffel S; Steyerberg EW; Van Calster B
Stat Med; 2014 Jul; 33(15):2585-96. PubMed ID: 24549725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prediction models for clustered data: comparison of a random intercept and standard regression model.
Bouwmeester W; Twisk JW; Kappen TH; van Klei WA; Moons KG; Vergouwe Y
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2013 Feb; 13():19. PubMed ID: 23414436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A simple approach to power and sample size calculations in logistic regression and Cox regression models.
Vaeth M; Skovlund E
Stat Med; 2004 Jun; 23(11):1781-92. PubMed ID: 15160408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prediction of an outcome using trajectories estimated from a linear mixed model.
Maruyama N; Takahashi F; Takeuchi M
J Biopharm Stat; 2009 Sep; 19(5):779-90. PubMed ID: 20183443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Risk prediction models for discrete ordinal outcomes: Calibration and the impact of the proportional odds assumption.
Edlinger M; van Smeden M; Alber HF; Wanitschek M; Van Calster B
Stat Med; 2022 Apr; 41(8):1334-1360. PubMed ID: 34897756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A global goodness-of-fit test for receiver operating characteristic curve analysis via the bootstrap method.
Zou KH; Resnic FS; Talos IF; Goldberg-Zimring D; Bhagwat JG; Haker SJ; Kikinis R; Jolesz FA; Ohno-Machado L
J Biomed Inform; 2005 Oct; 38(5):395-403. PubMed ID: 16198998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A simulation study of sample size demonstrated the importance of the number of events per variable to develop prediction models in clustered data.
Wynants L; Bouwmeester W; Moons KG; Moerbeek M; Timmerman D; Van Huffel S; Van Calster B; Vergouwe Y
J Clin Epidemiol; 2015 Dec; 68(12):1406-14. PubMed ID: 25817942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluating prediction models in reproductive medicine.
Coppus SF; van der Veen F; Opmeer BC; Mol BW; Bossuyt PM
Hum Reprod; 2009 Aug; 24(8):1774-8. PubMed ID: 19395365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A score regression approach to assess calibration of continuous probabilistic predictions.
Held L; Rufibach K; Balabdaoui F
Biometrics; 2010 Dec; 66(4):1295-305. PubMed ID: 20353460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [The necessity of validating regression models--characterization of the most important methods].
Muche R
Rehabilitation (Stuttg); 2008 Aug; 47(4):243-50. PubMed ID: 18704874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
