These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

331 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22847854)

  • 21. Digital vs. conventional full-arch implant impressions: a comparative study.
    Amin S; Weber HP; Finkelman M; El Rafie K; Kudara Y; Papaspyridakos P
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2017 Nov; 28(11):1360-1367. PubMed ID: 28039903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Marginal adaptation of zirconium dioxide copings: influence of the CAD/CAM system and the finish line design.
    Euán R; Figueras-Álvarez O; Cabratosa-Termes J; Oliver-Parra R
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Aug; 112(2):155-62. PubMed ID: 24445027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Effect of simulated intraoral variables on the accuracy of a photogrammetric imaging technique for complete-arch implant prostheses.
    Bratos M; Bergin JM; Rubenstein JE; Sorensen JA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Aug; 120(2):232-241. PubMed ID: 29559220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Internal fit of pressed and computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing ceramic crowns made from digital and conventional impressions.
    Anadioti E; Aquilino SA; Gratton DG; Holloway JA; Denry IL; Thomas GW; Qian F
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Apr; 113(4):304-9. PubMed ID: 25488521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. 3D and 2D marginal fit of pressed and CAD/CAM lithium disilicate crowns made from digital and conventional impressions.
    Anadioti E; Aquilino SA; Gratton DG; Holloway JA; Denry I; Thomas GW; Qian F
    J Prosthodont; 2014 Dec; 23(8):610-7. PubMed ID: 24995593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Direct mechanical data acquisition of dental impressions for the manufacturing of CAD/CAM restorations.
    Quaas S; Rudolph H; Luthardt RG
    J Dent; 2007 Dec; 35(12):903-8. PubMed ID: 17980951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Digital evaluation of the reproducibility of implant scanbody fit--an in vitro study.
    Stimmelmayr M; Güth JF; Erdelt K; Edelhoff D; Beuer F
    Clin Oral Investig; 2012 Jun; 16(3):851-6. PubMed ID: 21647591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparison of the marginal fit of lithium disilicate crowns fabricated with CAD/CAM technology by using conventional impressions and two intraoral digital scanners.
    Abdel-Azim T; Rogers K; Elathamna E; Zandinejad A; Metz M; Morton D
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Oct; 114(4):554-9. PubMed ID: 26100929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. An innovative method for evaluation of the 3-D internal fit of CAD/CAM crowns fabricated after direct optical versus indirect laser scan digitizing.
    Luthardt RG; Bornemann G; Lemelson S; Walter MH; Hüls A
    Int J Prosthodont; 2004; 17(6):680-5. PubMed ID: 15686096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Fit of 4-unit FDPs from CoCr and zirconia after conventional and digital impressions.
    Ueda K; Beuer F; Stimmelmayr M; Erdelt K; Keul C; Güth JF
    Clin Oral Investig; 2016 Mar; 20(2):283-9. PubMed ID: 26121970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Clinical use of a direct chairside oral scanner: an assessment of accuracy, time, and patient acceptance.
    Grünheid T; McCarthy SD; Larson BE
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Nov; 146(5):673-82. PubMed ID: 25439218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. In-vitro accuracy of casts for orthodontic purposes obtained by a conventional and by a printer workflow.
    Reich S; Herstell H; Raith S; Kühne C; Berndt S
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(3):e0282840. PubMed ID: 36920945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Influence of abutment tooth geometry on the accuracy of conventional and digital methods of obtaining dental impressions.
    Carbajal Mejía JB; Wakabayashi K; Nakamura T; Yatani H
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Sep; 118(3):392-399. PubMed ID: 28222873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Influence of Intra-Oral Scanner (I.O.S.) on The Marginal Accuracy of CAD/CAM Single Crowns.
    Ferrini F; Sannino G; Chiola C; Capparé P; Gastaldi G; Gherlone EF
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2019 Feb; 16(4):. PubMed ID: 30769768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Effect of CNC-milling on the marginal and internal fit of dental ceramics: a pilot study.
    Schaefer O; Kuepper H; Thompson GA; Cachovan G; Hefti AF; Guentsch A
    Dent Mater; 2013 Aug; 29(8):851-8. PubMed ID: 23743092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Can lithium disilicate ceramic crowns be fabricated on the basis of CBCT data?
    Kauling AEC; Keul C; Erdelt K; Kühnisch J; Güth JF
    Clin Oral Investig; 2019 Oct; 23(10):3739-3748. PubMed ID: 30725188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Accuracy of data obtained from impression scans and cast scans using different impression materials.
    Keul C; Runkel C; Güth JF; Schubert O
    Int J Comput Dent; 2020; 23(2):129-138. PubMed ID: 32555766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Accuracy of complete- and partial-arch impressions of actual intraoral scanning systems in vitro.
    Ender A; Zimmermann M; Mehl A
    Int J Comput Dent; 2019; 22(1):11-19. PubMed ID: 30848250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Accuracy of complete-arch dental impressions: a new method of measuring trueness and precision.
    Ender A; Mehl A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Feb; 109(2):121-8. PubMed ID: 23395338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A new method for the evaluation of the accuracy of full-arch digital impressions in vitro.
    Güth JF; Edelhoff D; Schweiger J; Keul C
    Clin Oral Investig; 2016 Sep; 20(7):1487-94. PubMed ID: 26454734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.