These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22849336)

  • 1. Determining optimal medical image compression: psychometric and image distortion analysis.
    Flint AC
    BMC Med Imaging; 2012 Jul; 12():24. PubMed ID: 22849336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. JPEG2000 3D compression vs. 2D compression: an assessment of artifact amount and computing time in compressing thin-section abdomen CT images.
    Kim B; Lee KH; Kim KJ; Richter T; Kang HS; Kim SY; Kim YH; Seo J
    Med Phys; 2009 Mar; 36(3):835-44. PubMed ID: 19378744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Lossy three-dimensional JPEG2000 compression of abdominal CT images: assessment of the visually lossless threshold and effect of compression ratio on image quality.
    Ringl H; Schernthaner RE; Kulinna-Cosentini C; Weber M; Schaefer-Prokop C; Herold CJ; Schima W
    Radiology; 2007 Nov; 245(2):467-74. PubMed ID: 17890355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of irreversible JPEG compression for a clinical ultrasound practice.
    Persons KR; Hangiandreou NJ; Charboneau NT; Charboneau J; James E; Douglas BR; Salmon AP; Knudsen JM; Erickson BJ
    J Digit Imaging; 2002 Mar; 15(1):15-21. PubMed ID: 12134210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Prediction of perceptible artifacts in JPEG 2000-compressed chest CT images using mathematical and perceptual quality metrics.
    Kim B; Lee KH; Kim KJ; Mantiuk R; Hahn S; Kim TJ; Kim YH
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Feb; 190(2):328-34. PubMed ID: 18212217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Swelling archives warrant closer look at compression.
    Schreiber D
    Radiol Manage; 2003; 25(5):36-9. PubMed ID: 14603591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Artifacts in slab average-intensity-projection images reformatted from JPEG 2000 compressed thin-section abdominal CT data sets.
    Kim B; Lee KH; Kim KJ; Mantiuk R; Kim HR; Kim YH
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Jun; 190(6):W342-50. PubMed ID: 18492876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Quality of compressed medical images.
    Shiao YH; Chen TJ; Chuang KS; Lin CH; Chuang CC
    J Digit Imaging; 2007 Jun; 20(2):149-59. PubMed ID: 17318703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The impact of image information on compressibility and degradation in medical image compression.
    Fidler A; Skaleric U; Likar B
    Med Phys; 2006 Aug; 33(8):2832-8. PubMed ID: 16964859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Differences in compression artifacts on thin- and thick-section lung CT images.
    Bajpai V; Lee KH; Kim B; Kim KJ; Kim TJ; Kim YH; Kang HS
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Aug; 191(2):W38-43. PubMed ID: 18647884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. JPEG compression of stereoscopic digital images for the diagnosis of diabetic retinopathy via teleophthalmology.
    Baker CF; Rudnisky CJ; Tennant MT; Sanghera P; Hinz BJ; De Leon AR; Greve MD
    Can J Ophthalmol; 2004 Dec; 39(7):746-54. PubMed ID: 15696764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Pan-Canadian evaluation of irreversible compression ratios ("lossy" compression) for development of national guidelines.
    Koff D; Bak P; Brownrigg P; Hosseinzadeh D; Khademi A; Kiss A; Lepanto L; Michalak T; Shulman H; Volkening A
    J Digit Imaging; 2009 Dec; 22(6):569-78. PubMed ID: 18931879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of irreversible compression ratios for medical images thin slice CT and update of Canadian Association of Radiologists (CAR) guidelines.
    Koff D; Bak P; Matos A; Norman G
    J Digit Imaging; 2013 Jun; 26(3):440-6. PubMed ID: 23179406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Quality assessment of DSA, ultrasound and CT digital images compressed with the JPEG protocol.
    Okkalides D; Efremides S
    Phys Med Biol; 1994 Sep; 39(9):1407-21. PubMed ID: 15552113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. JPEG vs. JPEG2000: benchmarking with dermatological images.
    Guarneri F; Vaccaro M; Guarneri C; Cannavò SP
    Skin Res Technol; 2014 Feb; 20(1):67-73. PubMed ID: 23724923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Image compression in morphometry studies requiring 21 CFR Part 11 compliance: procedure is key with TIFFs and various JPEG compression strengths.
    Tengowski MW
    Toxicol Pathol; 2004; 32(2):258-63. PubMed ID: 15200165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Robust data hiding for JPEG images with invertible neural network.
    Shang F; Lan Y; Yang J; Li E; Kang X
    Neural Netw; 2023 Jun; 163():219-232. PubMed ID: 37062180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Irreversible JPEG 2000 compression of abdominal CT for primary interpretation: assessment of visually lossless threshold.
    Lee KH; Kim YH; Kim BH; Kim KJ; Kim TJ; Kim HJ; Hahn S
    Eur Radiol; 2007 Jun; 17(6):1529-34. PubMed ID: 17119972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Rate distortion optimal bit allocation methods for volumetric data using JPEG 2000.
    Kosheleva OM; Usevitch BE; Cabrera SD; Vidal E
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2006 Aug; 15(8):2106-12. PubMed ID: 16900668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A joint source-channel distortion model for JPEG compressed images.
    Sabir MF; Sheikh HR; Heath RW; Bovik AC
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2006 Jun; 15(6):1349-64. PubMed ID: 16764262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.