These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22849718)

  • 1. Assessment of alternative genotyping strategies to maximize imputation accuracy at minimal cost.
    Huang Y; Hickey JM; Cleveland MA; Maltecca C
    Genet Sel Evol; 2012 Jul; 44(1):25. PubMed ID: 22849718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Practical implementation of cost-effective genomic selection in commercial pig breeding using imputation.
    Cleveland MA; Hickey JM
    J Anim Sci; 2013 Aug; 91(8):3583-92. PubMed ID: 23736050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Imputation of non-genotyped F1 dams to improve genetic gain in swine crossbreeding programs.
    See GM; Fix JS; Schwab CR; Spangler ML
    J Anim Sci; 2022 May; 100(5):. PubMed ID: 35451025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The impact of reducing the frequency of animals genotyped at higher density on imputation and prediction accuracies using ssGBLUP1.
    Sollero BP; Howard JT; Spangler ML
    J Anim Sci; 2019 Jul; 97(7):2780-2792. PubMed ID: 31115442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Genotype imputation from various low-density SNP panels and its impact on accuracy of genomic breeding values in pigs.
    Grossi DA; Brito LF; Jafarikia M; Schenkel FS; Feng Z
    Animal; 2018 Nov; 12(11):2235-2245. PubMed ID: 29706144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Genotype Imputation to Improve the Cost-Efficiency of Genomic Selection in Rabbits.
    Mancin E; Sosa-Madrid BS; Blasco A; Ibáñez-Escriche N
    Animals (Basel); 2021 Mar; 11(3):. PubMed ID: 33805619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Genotype Imputation To Improve the Cost-Efficiency of Genomic Selection in Farmed Atlantic Salmon.
    Tsai HY; Matika O; Edwards SM; Antolín-Sánchez R; Hamilton A; Guy DR; Tinch AE; Gharbi K; Stear MJ; Taggart JB; Bron JE; Hickey JM; Houston RD
    G3 (Bethesda); 2017 Apr; 7(4):1377-1383. PubMed ID: 28250015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Genomic selection using low density marker panels with application to a sire line in pigs.
    Wellmann R; Preuß S; Tholen E; Heinkel J; Wimmers K; Bennewitz J
    Genet Sel Evol; 2013 Jul; 45(1):28. PubMed ID: 23895218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Multi-generational imputation of single nucleotide polymorphism marker genotypes and accuracy of genomic selection.
    Toghiani S; Aggrey SE; Rekaya R
    Animal; 2016 Jul; 10(7):1077-85. PubMed ID: 27076192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Accuracy of genotype imputation in sheep breeds.
    Hayes BJ; Bowman PJ; Daetwyler HD; Kijas JW; van der Werf JH
    Anim Genet; 2012 Feb; 43(1):72-80. PubMed ID: 22221027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The feasibility of using low-density marker panels for genotype imputation and genomic prediction of crossbred dairy cattle of East Africa.
    Aliloo H; Mrode R; Okeyo AM; Ni G; Goddard ME; Gibson JP
    J Dairy Sci; 2018 Oct; 101(10):9108-9127. PubMed ID: 30077450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Optimizing Low-Cost Genotyping and Imputation Strategies for Genomic Selection in Atlantic Salmon.
    Tsairidou S; Hamilton A; Robledo D; Bron JE; Houston RD
    G3 (Bethesda); 2020 Feb; 10(2):581-590. PubMed ID: 31826882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Imputation of missing single nucleotide polymorphism genotypes using a multivariate mixed model framework.
    Calus MP; Veerkamp RF; Mulder HA
    J Anim Sci; 2011 Jul; 89(7):2042-9. PubMed ID: 21357451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Accuracy of whole-genome sequence imputation using hybrid peeling in large pedigreed livestock populations.
    Ros-Freixedes R; Whalen A; Chen CY; Gorjanc G; Herring WO; Mileham AJ; Hickey JM
    Genet Sel Evol; 2020 Apr; 52(1):17. PubMed ID: 32248811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Prioritizing animals for dense genotyping in order to impute missing genotypes of sparsely genotyped animals.
    Yu X; Woolliams JA; Meuwissen TH
    Genet Sel Evol; 2014 Aug; 46(1):46. PubMed ID: 25158690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Family-specific genotype arrays increase the accuracy of pedigree-based imputation at very low marker densities.
    Whalen A; Gorjanc G; Hickey JM
    Genet Sel Evol; 2019 Jun; 51(1):33. PubMed ID: 31242856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Low-depth genotyping-by-sequencing (GBS) in a bovine population: strategies to maximize the selection of high quality genotypes and the accuracy of imputation.
    Brouard JS; Boyle B; Ibeagha-Awemu EM; Bissonnette N
    BMC Genet; 2017 Apr; 18(1):32. PubMed ID: 28381212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Genotype imputation accuracy in a F2 pig population using high density and low density SNP panels.
    Gualdrón Duarte JL; Bates RO; Ernst CW; Raney NE; Cantet RJ; Steibel JP
    BMC Genet; 2013 May; 14():38. PubMed ID: 23651538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Strategies for single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) genotyping to enhance genotype imputation in Gyr (Bos indicus) dairy cattle: Comparison of commercially available SNP chips.
    Boison SA; Santos DJ; Utsunomiya AH; Carvalheiro R; Neves HH; O'Brien AM; Garcia JF; Sölkner J; da Silva MV
    J Dairy Sci; 2015 Jul; 98(7):4969-89. PubMed ID: 25958293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Design of low density SNP chips for genotype imputation in layer chicken.
    Herry F; Hérault F; Picard Druet D; Varenne A; Burlot T; Le Roy P; Allais S
    BMC Genet; 2018 Dec; 19(1):108. PubMed ID: 30514201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.