113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22850227)
1. Dose optimization for different medical imaging tasks from exposure index, exposure control factor, and MAS in digital radiography.
Zhang M; Zhao B; Wang Y; Chen W; Hou L
Health Phys; 2012 Sep; 103(3):235-40. PubMed ID: 22850227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Optimization of chest radiographic imaging parameters: a comparison of image quality and entrance skin dose for digital chest radiography systems.
Sun Z; Lin C; Tyan Y; Ng KH
Clin Imaging; 2012; 36(4):279-86. PubMed ID: 22726965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [A study of optimum radiographic conditions on chest examinations with computed radiology (CR) in conjunction with the offset balance of patient dose and image quality].
Muto H; Mori T; Hayakawa H
Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 2001 May; 61(6):303-9. PubMed ID: 11431936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Managing patient dose in digital radiology. A report of the International Commission on Radiological Protection.
International Commission on Radiological Protection
Ann ICRP; 2004; 34(1):1-73. PubMed ID: 15302167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of two objective methods to optimize kVp and personnel exposure using a digital indirect flat panel detector and simulated veterinary patients.
Copple C; Robertson ID; Thrall DE; Samei E
Vet Radiol Ultrasound; 2013; 54(1):9-16. PubMed ID: 23293957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A reduction in radiographic exposure and image quality in film screen postero-anterior chest radiography.
Egbe NO; Egong EA; Ekpo EU; Inah GB
Niger J Med; 2012; 21(1):21-4. PubMed ID: 23301442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Exposure variability and image quality in computed radiography.
Fauber TL
Radiol Technol; 2009; 80(3):209-15. PubMed ID: 19153197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effective dose efficiency: an application-specific metric of quality and dose for digital radiography.
Samei E; Ranger NT; Dobbins JT; Ravin CE
Phys Med Biol; 2011 Aug; 56(16):5099-118. PubMed ID: 21775791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Experimental investigations for dose reduction by optimizing the radiation quality for digital mammography with an a-Se detector].
Schulz-Wendtland R; Hermann KP; Wenkel E; Böhner C; Lell M; Dassel MS; Bautz WA
Rofo; 2007 May; 179(5):487-91. PubMed ID: 17436182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluating phantom image quality parameters to optimise patient radiation dose in dental digital radiology.
Gonzalez L; Vano E; Fernandez R; Ziraldo V; Delgado J; Delgado V; Moro J; Ubeda C
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2012 Aug; 151(1):95-101. PubMed ID: 22232776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Are exposure index values consistent in clinical practice? A multi-manufacturer investigation.
Butler ML; Rainford L; Last J; Brennan PC
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010; 139(1-3):371-4. PubMed ID: 20223849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Reduction of patient exposure by the use of digital luminescence radiography].
Seifert H; Chapot C
J Radiol; 1999 Nov; 80(11):1555-60. PubMed ID: 10592912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Patient doses and image quality in digital chest radiology.
Salát D; Nikodemová D
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):147-9. PubMed ID: 18321878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Digital chest radiography system with amorphous selenium flat-panel detectors: Qualitative and dosimetric comparison with a dedicated film-screen system.
Prato A; Ropolo R; Fava C
Radiol Med; 2005; 110(5-6):561-73. PubMed ID: 16437042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Digital radiography: are the manufacturers' settings too high? Optimisation of the Kodak digital radiography system with aid of the computed radiography dose index.
Peters SE; Brennan PC
Eur Radiol; 2002 Sep; 12(9):2381-7. PubMed ID: 12195499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Multidetector computed tomography chest examinations with low-kilovoltage protocols in adults: effect on image quality and radiation dose.
Kim MJ; Park CH; Choi SJ; Hwang KH; Kim HS
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2009; 33(3):416-21. PubMed ID: 19478637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Comparison of four digital and one conventional radiographic image systems for the chest in a patient study with subsequent system optimization].
Redlich U; Hoeschen C; Effenberger O; Fessel A; Preuss H; Reissberg S; Scherlach C; Döhring W
Rofo; 2005 Feb; 177(2):272-8. PubMed ID: 15666237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Digital radiography of the thorax with selenium detector. Clinical results and optimization potential of the technique].
Procacci C; Minniti S; Caumo F; Moore F; Ternullo S; Predicatori F; Locatelli F; Pistolesi GF
Radiol Med; 1998 Nov; 96(5):446-53. PubMed ID: 10051867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Noninvasive imaging of the coronary arteries using a 64-row multidetector CT scanner: initial clinical experience and radiation dose concerns.
Francone M; Napoli A; Carbone I; Cavacece M; Nardis PG; Lanciotti K; Visconti S; Bertoletti L; Di Castro E; Catalano C; Passariello R
Radiol Med; 2007 Feb; 112(1):31-46. PubMed ID: 17310293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Dose-image quality study in digital chest radiography using Monte Carlo simulation.
Correa SC; Souza EM; Silva AX; Lopes RT; Yoriyaz H
Appl Radiat Isot; 2008 Sep; 66(9):1213-7. PubMed ID: 18308576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
