These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22850227)

  • 21. Image quality and dose management in digital radiography: a new paradigm for optimisation.
    Busch HP; Faulkner K
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):143-7. PubMed ID: 16461521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Digital storage phosphor radiography. Doses and image quality].
    Salvini E; Pedroli G; Montanari G; Pastori R; Crespi A; Zincone G
    Radiol Med; 1994 Jun; 87(6):847-51. PubMed ID: 8041940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Image quality assessment and radiation doses in intraoral radiography.
    Yakoumakis EN; Tierris CE; Stefanou EP; Phanourakis IG; Proukakis CC
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2001 Mar; 91(3):362-8. PubMed ID: 11250637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The effect of different adaptation strengths on image quality and radiation dose using Siemens Care Dose 4D.
    Söderberg M; Gunnarsson M
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010; 139(1-3):173-9. PubMed ID: 20231163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. High kilovoltage digital exposure techniques and patient dosimetry.
    Fauber TL; Cohen TF; Dempsey MC
    Radiol Technol; 2011; 82(6):501-10. PubMed ID: 21771934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Tradeoffs between image quality and dose.
    Seibert JA
    Pediatr Radiol; 2004 Oct; 34 Suppl 3():S183-95; discussion S234-41. PubMed ID: 15558260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Digital radiography: image quality and radiation dose.
    Seibert JA
    Health Phys; 2008 Nov; 95(5):586-98. PubMed ID: 18849693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Relationships of clinical protocols and reconstruction kernels with image quality and radiation dose in a 128-slice CT scanner: study with an anthropomorphic and water phantom.
    Paul J; Krauss B; Banckwitz R; Maentele W; Bauer RW; Vogl TJ
    Eur J Radiol; 2012 May; 81(5):e699-703. PubMed ID: 21316888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Educating staff about digital radiography.
    Bowman D
    Radiol Manage; 2014; 36(3):34-40. PubMed ID: 25004684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Utility of digital radiography for the screening of pneumoconiosis as compared to analog radiography: radiation dose, image quality, and pneumoconiosis classification.
    Lee WJ; Choi BS
    Health Phys; 2012 Jul; 103(1):64-9. PubMed ID: 22647918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Analysis of image quality in digital chest imaging.
    De Hauwere A; Bacher K; Smeets P; Verstraete K; Thierens H
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):174-7. PubMed ID: 16461499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Quality assurance of computed and digital radiography systems.
    Walsh C; Gorman D; Byrne P; Larkin A; Dowling A; Malone JF
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):271-5. PubMed ID: 18319281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Application of adaptive non-linear 2D and 3D postprocessing filters for reduced dose abdominal CT.
    Borgen L; Kalra MK; Laerum F; Hachette IW; Fredriksson CH; Sandborg M; Smedby O
    Acta Radiol; 2012 Apr; 53(3):335-42. PubMed ID: 22362136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Use of automatic tube current modulation with a standardized noise index in young children undergoing chest computed tomography scans with 64-slice multidetector computed tomography.
    Peng Y; Li J; Ma D; Zhang Q; Liu Y; Zeng J; Sun G
    Acta Radiol; 2009 Dec; 50(10):1175-81. PubMed ID: 19922316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Chest radiography: a comparison of image quality and effective dose using four digital systems.
    Pascoal A; Lawinski CP; Mackenzie A; Tabakov S; Lewis CA
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):273-7. PubMed ID: 15933121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Radiation doses of indirect and direct digital cephalometric radiography.
    Gijbels F; Sanderink G; Wyatt J; Van Dam J; Nowak B; Jacobs R
    Br Dent J; 2004 Aug; 197(3):149-52; discussion 140. PubMed ID: 15311250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Patient dose in digital projection radiography.
    Compagnone G; Pagan L; Baleni MC; Calzolaio FL; Barozzi L; Bergamini C
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):135-7. PubMed ID: 18252850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Optimal multidetector row CT parameters for evaluations of the breast: a phantom and specimen study.
    Yi A; Seo BK; Cho PK; Pisano ED; Lee KY; Je BK; Kim HY; Min BW; Son GS
    Acad Radiol; 2010 Jun; 17(6):744-51. PubMed ID: 20457417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Pediatric interventional radiography equipment: safety considerations.
    Strauss KJ
    Pediatr Radiol; 2006 Sep; 36 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):126-35. PubMed ID: 16862405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A dose index as a tool to estimate paediatric patient doses in digital projection radiography.
    Garcia Castañon P; España Lopez ML; Fernandez Bedoya V; Bermudez Luna R; Rodriguez Martin G
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2012 May; 149(4):417-23. PubMed ID: 21775320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.