These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

294 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22850940)

  • 1. Biomechanical evaluation of a low profile, anchored cervical interbody spacer device in the setting of progressive flexion-distraction injury of the cervical spine.
    Wojewnik B; Ghanayem AJ; Tsitsopoulos PP; Voronov LI; Potluri T; Havey RM; Zelenakova J; Patel AA; Carandang G; Patwardhan AG
    Eur Spine J; 2013 Jan; 22(1):135-41. PubMed ID: 22850940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with a locked plate and wedged graft effectively stabilizes flexion-distraction stage-3 injury in the lower cervical spine: a biomechanical study.
    Paxinos O; Ghanayem AJ; Zindrick MR; Voronov LI; Havey RM; Carandang G; Hadjipavlou A; Patwardhan AG
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Jan; 34(1):E9-15. PubMed ID: 19127153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Biomechanical comparison of adjacent segmental motion after ventral cervical fixation with varying angles of lordosis.
    Hwang SH; Kayanja M; Milks RA; Benzel EC
    Spine J; 2007; 7(2):216-21. PubMed ID: 17321972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Biomechanical comparison of single- and two-level cervical arthroplasty versus arthrodesis: effect on adjacent-level spinal kinematics.
    Cunningham BW; Hu N; Zorn CM; McAfee PC
    Spine J; 2010 Apr; 10(4):341-9. PubMed ID: 20362252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Biomechanics of an integrated interbody device versus ACDF anterior locking plate in a single-level cervical spine fusion construct.
    Stein MI; Nayak AN; Gaskins RB; Cabezas AF; Santoni BG; Castellvi AE
    Spine J; 2014 Jan; 14(1):128-36. PubMed ID: 24231054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Biomechanical evaluation of a low-profile, anchored cervical interbody spacer device at the index level or adjacent to plated fusion.
    Balaram AK; Ghanayem AJ; OʼLeary PT; Voronov LI; Havey RM; Carandang G; Abjornson C; Patwardhan AG
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Jun; 39(13):E763-9. PubMed ID: 24732831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Biomechanical Stability of a Stand-Alone Interbody Spacer in Two-Level and Hybrid Cervical Fusion Constructs.
    Kang DG; Wagner SC; Tracey RW; Cody JP; Gaume RE; Lehman RA
    Global Spine J; 2017 Oct; 7(7):681-688. PubMed ID: 28989848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Properties of an interspinous fixation device (ISD) in lumbar fusion constructs: a biomechanical study.
    Techy F; Mageswaran P; Colbrunn RW; Bonner TF; McLain RF
    Spine J; 2013 May; 13(5):572-9. PubMed ID: 23498926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of two-level total disc replacement on cervical spine kinematics.
    Phillips FM; Tzermiadianos MN; Voronov LI; Havey RM; Carandang G; Dooris A; Patwardhan AG
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Oct; 34(22):E794-9. PubMed ID: 19829242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The biomechanical stability of a novel spacer with integrated plate in contiguous two-level and three-level ACDF models: an in vitro cadaveric study.
    Clavenna AL; Beutler WJ; Gudipally M; Moldavsky M; Khalil S
    Spine J; 2012 Feb; 12(2):157-63. PubMed ID: 22405617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Biomechanical evaluation of a newly developed monocortical expansion screw for use in anterior internal fixation of the cervical spine. In vitro comparison with two established internal fixation systems.
    Richter M; Wilke HJ; Kluger P; Claes L; Puhl W
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1999 Feb; 24(3):207-12. PubMed ID: 10025014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Local and global subaxial cervical spine biomechanics after single-level fusion or cervical arthroplasty.
    Finn MA; Brodke DS; Daubs M; Patel A; Bachus KN
    Eur Spine J; 2009 Oct; 18(10):1520-7. PubMed ID: 19585159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Anterior Transdiscal Axial Screw Fixation for Subaxial Cervical Spine: A Biomechanical Study.
    Zheng M; Ji W; Zou L; Huang Z; Zhu Q; Qu D
    World Neurosurg; 2018 Feb; 110():e459-e464. PubMed ID: 29133006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparative biomechanical study of traditional and in-line plating systems following immediate stabilization of single and bi-level cervical segments.
    Hunter W; Bucklen B; Muzumdar A; Moldavsky M; Hussain M; Khalil S
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2012 Jan; 27(1):84-90. PubMed ID: 21824696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Influence of cervical total disc replacement on motion in the target and adjacent segments.
    Vogt M; Mehren C; Hackenbroch C; Wilke HJ
    Spine J; 2024 Jul; 24(7):1313-1322. PubMed ID: 38301903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Do stand-alone interbody spacers with integrated screws provide adequate segmental stability for multilevel cervical arthrodesis?
    Paik H; Kang DG; Lehman RA; Cardoso MJ; Gaume RE; Ambati DV; Dmitriev AE
    Spine J; 2014 Aug; 14(8):1740-7. PubMed ID: 24462812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Biomechanical comparison of anterior cervical spine instrumentation techniques with and without supplemental posterior fusion after different corpectomy and discectomy combinations: Laboratory investigation.
    Setzer M; Eleraky M; Johnson WM; Aghayev K; Tran ND; Vrionis FD
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2012 Jun; 16(6):579-84. PubMed ID: 22423633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Influence of graft size on spinal instability with anterior cervical plate fixation following in vitro flexion-distraction injuries.
    Yao R; McLachlin SD; Rasoulinejad P; Gurr KR; Siddiqi F; Dunning CE; Bailey CS
    Spine J; 2016 Apr; 16(4):523-9. PubMed ID: 26282105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Biomechanical assessment of anchored cervical interbody cages: comparison of 2-screw and 4-screw designs.
    Reis MT; Reyes PM; Crawford NR
    Neurosurgery; 2014 Sep; 10 Suppl 3():412-7; discussion 417. PubMed ID: 24662505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Biomechanical analysis of an interbody cage with three integrated cancellous lag screws in a two-level cervical spine fusion construct: an in vitro study.
    Nayak AN; Stein MI; James CR; Gaskins RB; Cabezas AF; Adu-Lartey M; Castellvi AE; Santoni BG
    Spine J; 2014 Dec; 14(12):3002-10. PubMed ID: 24948039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.