These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
99 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22851415)
1. [Logic, probability and rhetoric in legal argumentation]. Palermo A Rev Synth; 2012; 133(3):319-44. PubMed ID: 22851415 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Précis of bayesian rationality: The probabilistic approach to human reasoning. Oaksford M; Chater N Behav Brain Sci; 2009 Feb; 32(1):69-84; discussion 85-120. PubMed ID: 19210833 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The rationality of informal argumentation: a Bayesian approach to reasoning fallacies. Hahn U; Oaksford M Psychol Rev; 2007 Jul; 114(3):704-32. PubMed ID: 17638503 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Logic, probability, and human reasoning. Johnson-Laird PN; Khemlani SS; Goodwin GP Trends Cogn Sci; 2015 Apr; 19(4):201-14. PubMed ID: 25770779 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The probability heuristics model of syllogistic reasoning. Chater N; Oaksford M Cogn Psychol; 1999 Mar; 38(2):191-258. PubMed ID: 10090803 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluating and selecting arguments in the context of higher order uncertainty. Straßer C; Michajlova L Front Artif Intell; 2023; 6():1133998. PubMed ID: 37275534 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. An Argumentation-Based Analysis of the Simonshaven Case. Prakken H Top Cogn Sci; 2020 Oct; 12(4):1068-1091. PubMed ID: 30873711 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. How argumentation theory can inform assessment validity: A critical review. Kinnear B; Schumacher DJ; Driessen EW; Varpio L Med Educ; 2022 Nov; 56(11):1064-1075. PubMed ID: 35851965 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Argumentation and evidence. Upshur RE; Colak E Theor Med Bioeth; 2003; 24(4):283-99. PubMed ID: 14620486 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Physician-patient argumentation and communication, comparing Toulmin's model, pragma-dialectics, and American sociolinguistics. Rivera FJ; Artmann E Cad Saude Publica; 2015 Dec; 31(12):2577-87. PubMed ID: 26872234 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The probability of iterated conditionals. van Wijnbergen-Huitink J; Elqayam S; Over DE Cogn Sci; 2015 May; 39(4):788-803. PubMed ID: 25238396 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Argumentation and explanation in the law. Rotolo A; Sartor G Front Artif Intell; 2023; 6():1130559. PubMed ID: 37731604 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [The Logic of Scientific Reasoning in Peer Review Process]. Takata N; Mimura M Brain Nerve; 2022 Apr; 74(4):335-340. PubMed ID: 35437285 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Social Rationality and Human Reasoning: Logical Expressivism and the Flat Mind. Oaksford M Top Cogn Sci; 2024 Oct; ():. PubMed ID: 39412379 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Analyzing the Simonshaven Case With and Without Probabilities. Verheij B Top Cogn Sci; 2020 Oct; 12(4):1175-1199. PubMed ID: 31347261 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Argument Quality in Real World Argumentation. Hahn U Trends Cogn Sci; 2020 May; 24(5):363-374. PubMed ID: 32298622 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Describing disease processes using a probabilistic logic of qualitative time. van der Heijden M; Lucas PJ Artif Intell Med; 2013 Nov; 59(3):143-55. PubMed ID: 24183893 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Of Models and Machines: Implementing Bounded Rationality. Dick S Isis; 2015 Sep; 106(3):623-34. PubMed ID: 26685521 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Law and Rhetoric: Critical Possibilities. Harrington J; Series L; Ruck-Keene A J Law Soc; 2019 Jun; 46(2):302-327. PubMed ID: 32390678 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]