352 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22851571)
1. Multidisciplinary care and pursuit of active surveillance in low-risk prostate cancer.
Aizer AA; Paly JJ; Zietman AL; Nguyen PL; Beard CJ; Rao SK; Kaplan ID; Niemierko A; Hirsch MS; Wu CL; Olumi AF; Michaelson MD; D'Amico AV; Efstathiou JA
J Clin Oncol; 2012 Sep; 30(25):3071-6. PubMed ID: 22851571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. What percentage of patients with newly diagnosed carcinoma of the prostate are candidates for surveillance? An analysis of the CaPSURE database.
Barocas DA; Cowan JE; Smith JA; Carroll PR;
J Urol; 2008 Oct; 180(4):1330-4; discussion 1334-5. PubMed ID: 18707731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Population based study of use and determinants of active surveillance and watchful waiting for low and intermediate risk prostate cancer.
Loeb S; Berglund A; Stattin P
J Urol; 2013 Nov; 190(5):1742-9. PubMed ID: 23727309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Time trends and characteristics of men choosing watchful waiting for initial treatment of localized prostate cancer: results from CaPSURE.
Harlan SR; Cooperberg MR; Elkin E; Lubeck DP; Meng M; Mehta SS; Carroll PR
J Urol; 2003 Nov; 170(5):1804-7. PubMed ID: 14532780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Careful selection and close monitoring of low-risk prostate cancer patients on active surveillance minimizes the need for treatment.
Soloway MS; Soloway CT; Eldefrawy A; Acosta K; Kava B; Manoharan M
Eur Urol; 2010 Dec; 58(6):831-5. PubMed ID: 20800964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Low-risk prostate cancer patients without visible tumor (T1c) on multiparametric MRI could qualify for active surveillance candidate even if they did not meet inclusion criteria of active surveillance protocol.
Lee DH; Koo KC; Lee SH; Rha KH; Choi YD; Hong SJ; Chung BH
Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2013 May; 43(5):553-8. PubMed ID: 23580758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Management of localised prostate cancer: watchful waiting, surgery or radiation therapy, depending on the natural course, which is often relatively slow.
Prescrire Int; 2012 Oct; 21(131):242-8. PubMed ID: 23185849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Further support for active surveillance in the management of low-volume, low-grade prostate cancer.
Albertsen P
Eur Urol; 2010 Dec; 58(6):836-7. PubMed ID: 20851512
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Preoperative prediction of small volume cancer (less than 0.5 ml) in radical prostatectomy specimens.
Cheng L; Poulos CK; Pan CX; Jones TD; Daggy JK; Eble JN; Koch MO
J Urol; 2005 Sep; 174(3):898-902. PubMed ID: 16093983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Economic analysis of active surveillance for localized prostate cancer.
Kim S; Dall'Era MA; Evans CP
Curr Opin Urol; 2012 May; 22(3):247-53. PubMed ID: 22388666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Selecting men diagnosed with prostate cancer for active surveillance using a risk calculator: a prospective impact study.
van Vugt HA; Roobol MJ; van der Poel HG; van Muilekom EH; Busstra M; Kil P; Oomens EH; Leliveld A; Bangma CH; Korfage I; Steyerberg EW
BJU Int; 2012 Jul; 110(2):180-7. PubMed ID: 22112199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Biopsy core number represents one of foremost predictors of clinically significant gleason sum upgrading in patients with low-risk prostate cancer.
Capitanio U; Karakiewicz PI; Valiquette L; Perrotte P; Jeldres C; Briganti A; Gallina A; Suardi N; Cestari A; Guazzoni G; Salonia A; Montorsi F
Urology; 2009 May; 73(5):1087-91. PubMed ID: 19195695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Active surveillance: the Canadian experience.
Klotz L
Curr Opin Urol; 2012 May; 22(3):222-30. PubMed ID: 22453335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cardiovascular comorbidity and treatment regret in men with recurrent prostate cancer.
Nguyen PL; Chen MH; Hoffman KE; Chen RC; Hu JC; Bennett CL; Kattan MW; Sartor O; Stein K; D'Amico AV
BJU Int; 2012 Jul; 110(2):201-5. PubMed ID: 22085233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Outcomes of initially expectantly managed patients with low or intermediate risk screen-detected localized prostate cancer.
Bul M; van den Bergh RC; Zhu X; Rannikko A; Vasarainen H; Bangma CH; Schröder FH; Roobol MJ
BJU Int; 2012 Dec; 110(11):1672-7. PubMed ID: 22928973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Repeat prostate biopsies predict location of index cancer in an active surveillance cohort.
Tseng KS; Landis P; Brimo F; Partin AW; Epstein JI; Carter HB
BJU Int; 2011 Nov; 108(9):1415-20. PubMed ID: 21443654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Clinical and pathologic outcome after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer patients with a preoperative Gleason sum of 8 to 10.
Bastian PJ; Gonzalgo ML; Aronson WJ; Terris MK; Kane CJ; Amling CL; Presti JC; Mangold LA; Humphreys E; Epstein JI; Partin AW; Freedland SJ
Cancer; 2006 Sep; 107(6):1265-72. PubMed ID: 16900523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Obesity is associated with risk of progression for low-risk prostate cancers managed expectantly.
Bhindi B; Kulkarni GS; Finelli A; Alibhai SM; Hamilton RJ; Toi A; van der Kwast TH; Evans A; Hersey K; Jewett MA; Zlotta AR; Trachtenberg J; Fleshner NE
Eur Urol; 2014 Nov; 66(5):841-8. PubMed ID: 24954793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Management and survival of screen-detected prostate cancer patients who might have been suitable for active surveillance.
Roemeling S; Roobol MJ; Postma R; Gosselaar C; van der Kwast TH; Bangma CH; Schröder FH
Eur Urol; 2006 Sep; 50(3):475-82. PubMed ID: 16713065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Percent of prostate needle biopsy cores with cancer is significant independent predictor of prostate specific antigen recurrence following radical prostatectomy: results from SEARCH database.
Freedland SJ; Aronson WJ; Terris MK; Kane CJ; Amling CL; Dorey F; Presti JC;
J Urol; 2003 Jun; 169(6):2136-41. PubMed ID: 12771735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
