These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22851648)

  • 1. Indirect genetic effects for survival in domestic chickens (Gallus gallus) are magnified in crossbred genotypes and show a parent-of-origin effect.
    Peeters K; Eppink TT; Ellen ED; Visscher J; Bijma P
    Genetics; 2012 Oct; 192(2):705-13. PubMed ID: 22851648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Genetic correlation and heritabilities for purebred and crossbred performance in poultry egg production traits.
    Wei M; van der Werf JH
    J Anim Sci; 1995 Aug; 73(8):2220-6. PubMed ID: 8567456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A crossbred reference population can improve the response to genomic selection for crossbred performance.
    Esfandyari H; Sørensen AC; Bijma P
    Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Sep; 47():76. PubMed ID: 26419430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Gene differential expression of liver tissues in crossbred versus purebred chicken and their relationship with heterosis of meat trait].
    Wang D; Zhang Y; Sun DX; Yu Y; Xu GY; Li JY
    Yi Chuan Xue Bao; 2004 Mar; 31(3):257-64. PubMed ID: 15195564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Joint evaluation of purebreds and crossbreds in swine.
    Lutaaya E; Misztal I; Mabry JW; Short T; Timm HH; Holzbauer R
    J Anim Sci; 2002 Sep; 80(9):2263-6. PubMed ID: 12350003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Can breeders solve mortality due to feather pecking in laying hens?
    Ellen ED; Bijma P
    Poult Sci; 2019 Sep; 98(9):3431-3442. PubMed ID: 31065706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Genetic parameter estimates from joint evaluation of purebreds and crossbreds in swine using the crossbred model.
    Lutaaya E; Misztal I; Mabry JW; Short T; Timm HH; Holzbauer R
    J Anim Sci; 2001 Dec; 79(12):3002-7. PubMed ID: 11811453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Selection for social genetic effects in purebreds increases growth in crossbreds.
    Ask B; Pedersen LV; Christensen OF; Nielsen HM; Turner SP; Nielsen B
    Genet Sel Evol; 2021 Feb; 53(1):15. PubMed ID: 33579188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Using egg production longitudinal recording to study the genetic background of resilience in purebred and crossbred laying hens.
    Bedere N; Berghof TVL; Peeters K; Pinard-van der Laan MH; Visscher J; David I; Mulder HA
    Genet Sel Evol; 2022 Apr; 54(1):26. PubMed ID: 35439920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Estimation of total genetic effects for survival time in crossbred laying hens showing cannibalism, using pedigree or genomic information.
    Brinker T; Raymond B; Bijma P; Vereijken A; Ellen ED
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2017 Feb; 134(1):60-68. PubMed ID: 27878876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Genomic prediction of survival time in a population of brown laying hens showing cannibalistic behavior.
    Alemu SW; Calus MP; Muir WM; Peeters K; Vereijken A; Bijma P
    Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Sep; 48(1):68. PubMed ID: 27623765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Plumage condition in laying hens: genetic parameters for direct and indirect effects in two purebred layer lines.
    Brinker T; Bijma P; Visscher J; Rodenburg TB; Ellen ED
    Genet Sel Evol; 2014 May; 46(1):33. PubMed ID: 24885199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Genomic evaluation by including dominance effects and inbreeding depression for purebred and crossbred performance with an application in pigs.
    Xiang T; Christensen OF; Vitezica ZG; Legarra A
    Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Nov; 48(1):92. PubMed ID: 27887565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Chicken genomics: feather-pecking and victim pigmentation.
    Keeling L; Andersson L; Schütz KE; Kerje S; Fredriksson R; Carlborg O; Cornwallis CK; Pizzari T; Jensen P
    Nature; 2004 Oct; 431(7009):645-6. PubMed ID: 15470416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Performance of selected and control lines of Duroc and Yorkshire pigs and their reciprocal crossbred progeny.
    Bereskin B
    J Anim Sci; 1983 Oct; 57(4):867-78. PubMed ID: 6643303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Feather pecking in chickens is genetically related to behavioural and developmental traits.
    Jensen P; Keeling L; Schütz K; Andersson L; Mormède P; Brändström H; Forkman B; Kerje S; Fredriksson R; Ohlsson C; Larsson S; Mallmin H; Kindmark A
    Physiol Behav; 2005 Sep; 86(1-2):52-60. PubMed ID: 16098546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessment of sire contribution and breed-of-origin of alleles in a three-way crossbred broiler dataset.
    Calus MPL; Vandenplas J; Hulsegge I; Borg R; Henshall JM; Hawken R
    Poult Sci; 2019 Dec; 98(12):6270-6280. PubMed ID: 31393589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The genetic architecture of socially-affected traits: a GWAS for direct and indirect genetic effects on survival time in laying hens showing cannibalism.
    Brinker T; Bijma P; Vereijken A; Ellen ED
    Genet Sel Evol; 2018 Jul; 50(1):38. PubMed ID: 30037326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Survival of laying hens: genetic parameters for direct and associative effects in three purebred layer lines.
    Ellen ED; Visscher J; van Arendonk JA; Bijma P
    Poult Sci; 2008 Feb; 87(2):233-9. PubMed ID: 18212365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Estimating the purebred-crossbred genetic correlation for uniformity of eggshell color in laying hens.
    Mulder HA; Visscher J; Fablet J
    Genet Sel Evol; 2016 May; 48(1):39. PubMed ID: 27151311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.