772 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22851670)
1. Rescuer fatigue under the 2010 ERC guidelines, and its effect on cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) performance.
McDonald CH; Heggie J; Jones CM; Thorne CJ; Hulme J
Emerg Med J; 2013 Aug; 30(8):623-7. PubMed ID: 22851670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of one-rescuer compression/ventilation ratios on cardiopulmonary resuscitation in infant, pediatric, and adult manikins.
Srikantan SK; Berg RA; Cox T; Tice L; Nadkarni VM
Pediatr Crit Care Med; 2005 May; 6(3):293-7. PubMed ID: 15857527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Rescuer fatigue: standard versus continuous chest-compression cardiopulmonary resuscitation.
Heidenreich JW; Berg RA; Higdon TA; Ewy GA; Kern KB; Sanders AB
Acad Emerg Med; 2006 Oct; 13(10):1020-6. PubMed ID: 17015418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Rescuer-limited cardiopulmonary resuscitation as an alternative to 2-min switched CPR in the setting of inhospital cardiac arrest: a randomised cross-over study.
Jo CH; Cho GC; Ahn JH; Park YS; Lee CH
Emerg Med J; 2015 Jul; 32(7):539-43. PubMed ID: 25092797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. CPR PRO® device reduces rescuer fatigue during continuous chest compression cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a randomized crossover trial using a manikin model.
Kovic I; Lulic D; Lulic I
J Emerg Med; 2013 Oct; 45(4):570-7. PubMed ID: 23845522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Quality of chest compressions during compression-only CPR: a comparative analysis following the 2005 and 2010 American Heart Association guidelines.
Yang Z; Li H; Yu T; Chen C; Xu J; Chu Y; Zhou T; Jiang L; Huang Z
Am J Emerg Med; 2014 Jan; 32(1):50-4. PubMed ID: 24210889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A different rescuer changing strategy between 30:2 cardiopulmonary resuscitation and hands-only cardiopulmonary resuscitation that considers rescuer factors: a randomised cross-over simulation study with a time-dependent analysis.
Hong DY; Park SO; Lee KR; Baek KJ; Shin DH
Resuscitation; 2012 Mar; 83(3):353-9. PubMed ID: 22101200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Incomplete chest wall decompression: a clinical evaluation of CPR performance by EMS personnel and assessment of alternative manual chest compression-decompression techniques.
Aufderheide TP; Pirrallo RG; Yannopoulos D; Klein JP; von Briesen C; Sparks CW; Deja KA; Conrad CJ; Kitscha DJ; Provo TA; Lurie KG
Resuscitation; 2005 Mar; 64(3):353-62. PubMed ID: 15733766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Rescuer fatigue in the elderly: standard vs. hands-only CPR.
Heidenreich JW; Bonner A; Sanders AB
J Emerg Med; 2012 Jan; 42(1):88-92. PubMed ID: 20634016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Single rescuer cardiopulmonary resuscitation: can anyone perform to the guidelines 2000 recommendations?
Higdon TA; Heidenreich JW; Kern KB; Sanders AB; Berg RA; Hilwig RW; Clark LL; Ewy GA
Resuscitation; 2006 Oct; 71(1):34-9. PubMed ID: 16942829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A new defibrillator mode to reduce chest compression interruptions for health care professionals and lay rescuers: a pilot study in manikins.
Barash DM; Raymond RP; Tan Q; Silver AE
Prehosp Emerg Care; 2011; 15(1):88-97. PubMed ID: 21091330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. 2005 American Heart Association (AHA) guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and emergency cardiovascular care (ECC) of pediatric and neonatal patients: pediatric basic life support.
American Heart Association
Pediatrics; 2006 May; 117(5):e989-1004. PubMed ID: 16651298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A 10-s rest improves chest compression quality during hands-only cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a prospective, randomized crossover study using a manikin model.
Min MK; Yeom SR; Ryu JH; Kim YI; Park MR; Han SK; Lee SH; Cho SJ
Resuscitation; 2013 Sep; 84(9):1279-84. PubMed ID: 23402967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Chest compression depth after change in CPR guidelines--improved but not sufficient.
Kampmeier TG; Lukas RP; Steffler C; Sauerland C; Weber TP; Van Aken H; Bohn A
Resuscitation; 2014 Apr; 85(4):503-8. PubMed ID: 24418280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Influence of chest compression rate guidance on the quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation performed on manikins.
Jäntti H; Silfvast T; Turpeinen A; Kiviniemi V; Uusaro A
Resuscitation; 2009 Apr; 80(4):453-7. PubMed ID: 19203821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Does the quality of chest compressions deteriorate when the chest compression rate is above 120/min?
Lee SH; Kim K; Lee JH; Kim T; Kang C; Park C; Kim J; Jo YH; Rhee JE; Kim DH
Emerg Med J; 2014 Aug; 31(8):645-8. PubMed ID: 23704754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation on manikins: on the floor and in the bed.
Jäntti H; Silfvast T; Turpeinen A; Kiviniemi V; Uusaro A
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2009 Oct; 53(9):1131-7. PubMed ID: 19388894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The quality of a newly developed infant chest compression method applied by paramedics: a randomised crossover manikin trial.
Smereka J; Kasiński M; Smereka A; Ładny JR; Szarpak Ł
Kardiol Pol; 2017; 75(6):589-595. PubMed ID: 28150278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Chest compression quality comparing 1-min vs 2-min rotation of rescuers wearing N95 masks.
Mathew MJ; Kundra P; Vinayagam S
Am J Emerg Med; 2024 Feb; 76():75-81. PubMed ID: 38006635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Individualized rescuer change by a team leader during uninterrupted cardiopulmonary resuscitation: comparison with rescuer change in 2-min intervals.
Shin DH; Cho JH; Park SO
Eur J Emerg Med; 2016 Aug; 23(4):263-268. PubMed ID: 25738793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]