These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22852458)

  • 1. Social values and health priority setting in England: "values" based decision making.
    Littlejohns P; Sharma T; Jeong K
    J Health Organ Manag; 2012; 26(3):363-73. PubMed ID: 22852458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Social values and health priority setting in Germany.
    Kieslich K
    J Health Organ Manag; 2012; 26(3):374-83. PubMed ID: 22852459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Social values and healthcare priority setting in Korea.
    Ahn J; Kim G; Suh HS; Lee SM
    J Health Organ Manag; 2012; 26(3):343-50. PubMed ID: 22852456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Social values and health priority setting in China.
    Docherty M; Cao Q; Wang H
    J Health Organ Manag; 2012; 26(3):351-62. PubMed ID: 22852457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Use of economic evaluation in local health care decision-making in England: a qualitative investigation.
    Eddama O; Coast J
    Health Policy; 2009 Mar; 89(3):261-70. PubMed ID: 18657336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Consideration of social values in the establishment of accountable care organizations in the USA.
    Keren R; Littlejohns P
    J Health Organ Manag; 2012; 26(3):384-9. PubMed ID: 22852460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A proposal for a new social values research program and policy network.
    Littlejohns P; Yeung K; Clark S; Weale A
    J Health Organ Manag; 2012; 26(3):407-21. PubMed ID: 22852462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Social values in health priority setting: a conceptual framework.
    Clark S; Weale A
    J Health Organ Manag; 2012; 26(3):293-316. PubMed ID: 22852453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. How should cost-effectiveness analysis be used in health technology coverage decisions? Evidence from the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence approach.
    Williams I; Bryan S; McIver S
    J Health Serv Res Policy; 2007 Apr; 12(2):73-9. PubMed ID: 17407655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Social values and health priority setting in Australia: an analysis applied to the context of health technology assessment.
    Whitty JA; Littlejohns P
    Health Policy; 2015 Feb; 119(2):127-36. PubMed ID: 25267072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany.
    Bekkering GE; Kleijnen J
    Eur J Health Econ; 2008 Nov; 9 Suppl 1():5-29. PubMed ID: 18987905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Social value judgments in healthcare: a philosophical critique.
    Biron L; Rumbold B; Faden R
    J Health Organ Manag; 2012; 26(3):317-30. PubMed ID: 22852454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Social values and health policy: a new international research programme.
    Littlejohns P; Weale A; Chalkidou K; Faden R; Teerawattananon Y
    J Health Organ Manag; 2012; 26(3):285-92. PubMed ID: 22852452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Efficiency or equity: value judgments in coverage decisions in Thailand.
    Tantivess S; Pérez Velasco R; Yothasamut J; Mohara A; Limprayoonyong H; Teerawattananon Y
    J Health Organ Manag; 2012; 26(3):331-42. PubMed ID: 22852455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Risk management frameworks for human health and environmental risks.
    Jardine C; Hrudey S; Shortreed J; Craig L; Krewski D; Furgal C; McColl S
    J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev; 2003; 6(6):569-720. PubMed ID: 14698953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany].
    Bekkering GE; Kleijnen J
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2008 Dec; 133 Suppl 7():S225-46. PubMed ID: 19034813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Creating sustainable health care systems.
    Littlejohns P; Kieslich K; Weale A; Tumilty E; Richardson G; Stokes T; Gauld R; Scuffham P
    J Health Organ Manag; 2019 Mar; 33(1):18-34. PubMed ID: 30859907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Fairness and accountability for reasonableness. Do the views of priority setting decision makers differ across health systems and levels of decision making?
    Kapiriri L; Norheim OF; Martin DK
    Soc Sci Med; 2009 Feb; 68(4):766-73. PubMed ID: 19070414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Ethics and economics: does programme budgeting and marginal analysis contribute to fair priority setting?
    Gibson J; Mitton C; Martin D; Donaldson C; Singer P
    J Health Serv Res Policy; 2006 Jan; 11(1):32-7. PubMed ID: 16378530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Priority setting in global health: towards a minimum DALY value.
    Drake T
    Health Econ; 2014 Feb; 23(2):248-52. PubMed ID: 23576492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.