These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

431 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22852511)

  • 41. A rare earth screen-film system for dental panoramic radiography.
    Keur JJ
    Aust Dent J; 1983 Apr; 28(2):105-8. PubMed ID: 6577821
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Subjective image quality of digitally filtered radiographs acquired by the Dürr Vistascan system compared with conventional radiographs.
    Yalcinkaya S; Künzel A; Willers R; Thoms M; Becker J
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2006 May; 101(5):643-51. PubMed ID: 16632278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. A comparison of the response of storage phosphor and film radiography to small variations in X-ray exposure.
    Hildebolt CF; Fletcher G; Yokoyama-Crothers N; Conover GL; Vannier MW
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1997 May; 26(3):147-51. PubMed ID: 9442600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Effect of kilovoltage on the relative speed of rare-earth screens.
    Thunthy KH; Weinberg R
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1986; 15(1):27-30. PubMed ID: 3460902
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Patient radiation dose management in dental facilities according to the X-ray focal distance and the image receptor type.
    Gonzalez L; Moro J
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2007 Jul; 36(5):282-4. PubMed ID: 17586855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. [Will the new highly intensifying film-screen combination of the Kodak T-MAT G/Lanex Regular meet the qualitative requirements of the lateral teleroentgenogram and orthopantomogram?].
    Schulz D; Bührmann K; Plein-Jakobs E; Jakobs W
    Fortschr Kieferorthop; 1988 Jun; 49(3):305-11. PubMed ID: 3165364
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Assessment of image quality in dental radiography, part 2: optimum exposure conditions for detection of small mass changes in 6 intraoral radiography systems.
    Yoshiura K; Kawazu T; Chikui T; Tatsumi M; Tokumori K; Tanaka T; Kanda S
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1999 Jan; 87(1):123-9. PubMed ID: 9927091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. The quality of the X-ray image: fault analysis.
    Brocklebank LM
    Dent Update; 1998 Jun; 25(5):188-90, 192-4. PubMed ID: 18170953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Global quality control perspective for the physical and technical aspects of screen-film mammography--image quality and radiation dose.
    Ng KH; Jamal N; DeWerd L
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 121(4):445-51. PubMed ID: 16709704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. The use of dental radiographs: update and recommendations.
    American Dental Association Council on Scientific Affairs
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2006 Sep; 137(9):1304-12. PubMed ID: 16946440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Obstacles remain on road to digital mammography.
    Johnson M
    Diagn Imaging (San Franc); 1999 Nov; Suppl Digital():D19-21. PubMed ID: 10724731
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Radiation dose and image quality in diagnostic radiology. Optimization of the dose-image quality relationship with clinical experience from scoliosis radiography, coronary intervention and a flat-panel digital detector.
    Geijer H
    Acta Radiol Suppl; 2002 Mar; 43(427):1-43. PubMed ID: 12108231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. An investigation of potential applications of intensifying screens in intraoral radiography.
    Stephens RG; Kogon SL; Reid JA
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1982 Nov; 54(5):591-6. PubMed ID: 6960313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Direct digital radiography in the dental office.
    Wenzel A; Gröndahl HG
    Int Dent J; 1995 Feb; 45(1):27-34. PubMed ID: 7607741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Comparison of methods for acceptance and constancy testing in dental cone-beam computed tomography.
    Steiding C; Kolditz D; Kalender W
    Rofo; 2015 Apr; 187(4):283-90. PubMed ID: 25389669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Assessment of image quality in dental radiography, part 1: phantom validity.
    Yoshiura K; Kawazu T; Chikui T; Tatsumi M; Tokumori K; Tanaka T; Kanda S
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1999 Jan; 87(1):115-22. PubMed ID: 9927090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Current practice in conventional and digital intraoral radiography: problems and solutions.
    Fuhrmann AW
    Int J Comput Dent; 2006 Jan; 9(1):61-8. PubMed ID: 16608054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Raising the standards of dental radiology in primary dental care.
    Hirschmann PN
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1995 Feb; 24(1):3-4. PubMed ID: 8593904
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Radiation protection & regulations.
    Milam DW
    Va Dent J; 1991; 68(3):45-7. PubMed ID: 1816696
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. The consistent image--how to improve the quality of dental radiographs: 1. Quality scale, operator technique, X-ray set.
    Carmichael F
    Dent Update; 2005 Dec; 32(10):611-3, 616. PubMed ID: 16379438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 22.