These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

393 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2285267)

  • 41. Comparison of the magnetoencephalogram and electroencephalogram.
    Cuffin BN; Cohen D
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1979 Aug; 47(2):132-46. PubMed ID: 95707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Benefit of simultaneous recording of EEG and MEG in dipole localization.
    Yoshinaga H; Nakahori T; Ohtsuka Y; Oka E; Kitamura Y; Kiriyama H; Kinugasa K; Miyamoto K; Hoshida T
    Epilepsia; 2002 Aug; 43(8):924-8. PubMed ID: 12181013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Differences between MEG and high-density EEG source localizations using a distributed source model in comparison to fMRI.
    Klamer S; Elshahabi A; Lerche H; Braun C; Erb M; Scheffler K; Focke NK
    Brain Topogr; 2015 Jan; 28(1):87-94. PubMed ID: 25296614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Evaluation of postoperative sharp waveforms through EEG and magnetoencephalography.
    Lee JW; Tanaka N; Shiraishi H; Milligan TA; Dworetzky BA; Khoshbin S; Stufflebeam SM; Bromfield EB
    J Clin Neurophysiol; 2010 Feb; 27(1):7-11. PubMed ID: 20087209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. A random dipole model for spontaneous brain activity.
    de Munck JC; Vijn PC; Lopes da Silva FH
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1992 Aug; 39(8):791-804. PubMed ID: 1505993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Implanted medical devices or other strong sources of interference are not barriers to magnetoencephalographic recordings in epilepsy patients.
    Jin K; Alexopoulos AV; Mosher JC; Burgess RC
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2013 Jul; 124(7):1283-9. PubMed ID: 23664658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. MEG and EEG topography of frontal midline theta rhythm and source localization.
    Iramina K; Ueno S; Matsuoka S
    Brain Topogr; 1996; 8(3):329-31. PubMed ID: 8728427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Precision of dipole localization in a spherical volume conductor: a comparison of referential EEG, magnetoencephalography and scalp current density methods.
    Murro AM; Smith JR; King DW; Park YD
    Brain Topogr; 1995; 8(2):119-25. PubMed ID: 8793122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. A study of dipole localization accuracy for MEG and EEG using a human skull phantom.
    Leahy RM; Mosher JC; Spencer ME; Huang MX; Lewine JD
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1998 Aug; 107(2):159-73. PubMed ID: 9751287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Accuracy of EEG dipole source localization using implanted sources in the human brain.
    Krings T; Chiappa KH; Cuffin BN; Cochius JI; Connolly S; Cosgrove GR
    Clin Neurophysiol; 1999 Jan; 110(1):106-14. PubMed ID: 10348329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Dipole localization of human induced focal afterdischarge seizure in simultaneous magnetoencephalography and electrocorticography.
    Sutherling WW; Akhtari M; Mamelak AN; Mosher J; Arthur D; Sands S; Weiss P; Lopez N; DiMauro M; Flynn E; Leah R
    Brain Topogr; 2001; 14(2):101-16. PubMed ID: 11797809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Experimental tests of EEG source localization accuracy in spherical head models.
    Cuffin BN; Schomer DL; Ives JR; Blume H
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2001 Jan; 112(1):46-51. PubMed ID: 11137660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. MEG-EEG Information Fusion and Electromagnetic Source Imaging: From Theory to Clinical Application in Epilepsy.
    Chowdhury RA; Zerouali Y; Hedrich T; Heers M; Kobayashi E; Lina JM; Grova C
    Brain Topogr; 2015 Nov; 28(6):785-812. PubMed ID: 26016950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Source localization of EEG versus MEG: empirical comparison using visually evoked responses and theoretical considerations.
    Lopes da Silva FH; Wieringa HJ; Peters MJ
    Brain Topogr; 1991; 4(2):133-42. PubMed ID: 1793687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Demonstration of useful differences between magnetoencephalogram and electroencephalogram.
    Cohen D; Cuffin BN
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1983 Jul; 56(1):38-51. PubMed ID: 6190632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Localization of implanted dipoles by magnetoencephalography.
    Balish M; Sato S; Connaughton P; Kufta C
    Neurology; 1991 Jul; 41(7):1072-6. PubMed ID: 1906146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Magnetoencephalography signals are influenced by skull defects.
    Lau S; Flemming L; Haueisen J
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2014 Aug; 125(8):1653-62. PubMed ID: 24418220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Dipole source analysis for readiness potential and field using simultaneously measured EEG and MEG signals.
    Mideksa KG; Hellriegel H; Hoogenboom N; Krause H; Schnitzler A; Deuschl G; Raethjen J; Heute U; Muthuraman M
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2013; 2013():1362-5. PubMed ID: 24109949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. DYNAMO: concurrent dynamic multi-model source localization method for EEG and/or MEG.
    Antelis JM; Minguez J
    J Neurosci Methods; 2013 Jan; 212(1):28-42. PubMed ID: 23022309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Comparison of the spatial resolution of source imaging techniques in high-density EEG and MEG.
    Hedrich T; Pellegrino G; Kobayashi E; Lina JM; Grova C
    Neuroimage; 2017 Aug; 157():531-544. PubMed ID: 28619655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.