These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22853650)

  • 21. Are studies reporting significant results more likely to be published?
    Koletsi D; Karagianni A; Pandis N; Makou M; Polychronopoulou A; Eliades T
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Nov; 136(5):632.e1-5; discussion 632-3. PubMed ID: 19892276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Will publication bias vanish in the age of online journals?
    Berlin JA
    Online J Curr Clin Trials; 1992 Jul; Doc No 12():[1337 words; 10 paragraphs]. PubMed ID: 1343607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Citation rate and perceived subject bias in the amphibian-decline literature.
    Ohmer ME; Bishop PJ
    Conserv Biol; 2011 Feb; 25(1):195-9. PubMed ID: 21251072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The appropriateness of asymmetry tests for publication bias in meta-analyses: a large survey.
    Ioannidis JP; Trikalinos TA
    CMAJ; 2007 Apr; 176(8):1091-6. PubMed ID: 17420491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Effect size, confidence interval and statistical significance: a practical guide for biologists.
    Nakagawa S; Cuthill IC
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2007 Nov; 82(4):591-605. PubMed ID: 17944619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The (mis)reporting of statistical results in psychology journals.
    Bakker M; Wicherts JM
    Behav Res Methods; 2011 Sep; 43(3):666-78. PubMed ID: 21494917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Perceived information gain from randomized trials correlates with publication in high-impact factor journals.
    Evangelou E; Siontis KC; Pfeiffer T; Ioannidis JP
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2012 Dec; 65(12):1274-81. PubMed ID: 22959593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The Prevalence of Marginally Significant Results in Psychology Over Time.
    Olsson-Collentine A; van Assen MALM; Hartgerink CHJ
    Psychol Sci; 2019 Apr; 30(4):576-586. PubMed ID: 30789796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A Monte-Carlo estimation of effect size distortion due to significance testing.
    Bradley MT; Smith D; Stoica G
    Percept Mot Skills; 2002 Dec; 95(3 Pt 1):837-42. PubMed ID: 12509183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Mapping the literature of nurse practitioners.
    Shams ML
    J Med Libr Assoc; 2006 Apr; 94(2 Suppl):E114-21. PubMed ID: 16710457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Publication bias in the anesthesiology literature.
    De Oliveira GS; Chang R; Kendall MC; Fitzgerald PC; McCarthy RJ
    Anesth Analg; 2012 May; 114(5):1042-8. PubMed ID: 22344237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Journal publications from Zagreb University Medical School in 1995-1999.
    Petrak J; Bozikov J
    Croat Med J; 2003 Dec; 44(6):681-9. PubMed ID: 14652879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The ironic effect of significant results on the credibility of multiple-study articles.
    Schimmack U
    Psychol Methods; 2012 Dec; 17(4):551-66. PubMed ID: 22924598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Putative null distributions corresponding to tests of differential expression in the Golden Spike dataset are intensity dependent.
    Gaile DP; Miecznikowski JC
    BMC Genomics; 2007 Apr; 8():105. PubMed ID: 17445265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Citation rates of medical German-language journals in English-language papers - do they correlate with the Impact Factor, and who cites?].
    Winkmann G; Schlutius S; Schweim HG
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2002 Jan; 127(4):138-43. PubMed ID: 11807657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A test for publication bias in meta-analysis with sparse binary data.
    Schwarzer G; Antes G; Schumacher M
    Stat Med; 2007 Feb; 26(4):721-33. PubMed ID: 16755545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Presence of pharmacoepidemiology in three bibliographic databases: Medline, IPA and SCI.
    Arrebola-Pascual I; García-López JA
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2002 Sep; 11(6):499-502. PubMed ID: 12426935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Hail the impossible: p-values, evidence, and likelihood.
    Johansson T
    Scand J Psychol; 2011 Apr; 52(2):113-25. PubMed ID: 21077903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Searching the veterinary literature: a comparison of the coverage of veterinary journals by nine bibliographic databases.
    Grindlay DJ; Brennan ML; Dean RS
    J Vet Med Educ; 2012; 39(4):404-12. PubMed ID: 23187034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [The dance about the "impact factor"].
    Rehfeld JF; Nielsen LB; Jørgensen HL
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2007 Jun; 169(24):2317. PubMed ID: 17594848
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.