216 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22853706)
1. Virtual patients design and its effect on clinical reasoning and student experience: a protocol for a randomised factorial multi-centre study.
Bateman J; Allen ME; Kidd J; Parsons N; Davies D
BMC Med Educ; 2012 Aug; 12():62. PubMed ID: 22853706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Virtual patient design: exploring what works and why. A grounded theory study.
Bateman J; Allen M; Samani D; Kidd J; Davies D
Med Educ; 2013 Jun; 47(6):595-606. PubMed ID: 23662877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The virtual patient as a learning tool: a mixed quantitative qualitative study.
Isaza-Restrepo A; Gómez MT; Cifuentes G; Argüello A
BMC Med Educ; 2018 Dec; 18(1):297. PubMed ID: 30522478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The use of virtual patients to teach medical students history taking and communication skills.
Stevens A; Hernandez J; Johnsen K; Dickerson R; Raij A; Harrison C; DiPietro M; Allen B; Ferdig R; Foti S; Jackson J; Shin M; Cendan J; Watson R; Duerson M; Lok B; Cohen M; Wagner P; Lind DS
Am J Surg; 2006 Jun; 191(6):806-11. PubMed ID: 16720154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Virtual patient simulation: what do students make of it? A focus group study.
Botezatu M; Hult H; Fors UG
BMC Med Educ; 2010 Dec; 10():91. PubMed ID: 21129220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Virtual patients in primary care: developing a reusable model that fosters reflective practice and clinical reasoning.
Salminen H; Zary N; Björklund K; Toth-Pal E; Leanderson C
J Med Internet Res; 2014 Jan; 16(1):e3. PubMed ID: 24394603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Medical students' views on the use of virtual patients for teaching and assessment of clinical knowledge and reasoning].
Oliven A; Nave R; Hasson-Gilad DR; Baruch A
Harefuah; 2013 May; 152(5):257-61, 310. PubMed ID: 23885447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Design and implementation of virtual patients for learning of clinical reasoning.
Huwendiek S
GMS J Med Educ; 2019; 36(4):Doc33. PubMed ID: 31544133
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Curricular integration of virtual patients: a unifying perspective of medical teachers and students.
Dafli E; Fountoukidis I; Hatzisevastou-Loukidou C; D Bamidis P
BMC Med Educ; 2019 Nov; 19(1):416. PubMed ID: 31706296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The use of virtual patients to assess the clinical skills and reasoning of medical students: initial insights on student acceptance.
Gesundheit N; Brutlag P; Youngblood P; Gunning WT; Zary N; Fors U
Med Teach; 2009 Aug; 31(8):739-42. PubMed ID: 19811211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The effectiveness of internet-based e-learning on clinician behavior and patient outcomes: a systematic review protocol.
Sinclair P; Kable A; Levett-Jones T
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2015 Jan; 13(1):52-64. PubMed ID: 26447007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The impact of small-group virtual patient simulator training on perceptions of individual learning process and curricular integration: a multicentre cohort study of nursing and medical students.
Mestre A; Muster M; El Adib AR; Ösp Egilsdottir H; Byermoen KR; Padilha M; Aguilar T; Tabagari N; Betts L; Sales L; Garcia P; Ling L; Café H; Binnie A; Marreiros A
BMC Med Educ; 2022 May; 22(1):375. PubMed ID: 35578233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Integrating virtual patients into courses: follow-up seminars and perceived benefit.
Edelbring S; Broström O; Henriksson P; Vassiliou D; Spaak J; Dahlgren LO; Fors U; Zary N
Med Educ; 2012 Apr; 46(4):417-25. PubMed ID: 22429178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Perception of enhanced learning in medicine through integrating of virtual patients: an exploratory study on knowledge acquisition and transfer.
Li Z; Asoodar M; de Jong N; Keulers T; Liu X; Dolmans D
BMC Med Educ; 2024 Jun; 24(1):647. PubMed ID: 38858668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Student and educator experiences of maternal-child simulation-based learning: a systematic review of qualitative evidence protocol.
MacKinnon K; Marcellus L; Rivers J; Gordon C; Ryan M; Butcher D
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2015 Jan; 13(1):14-26. PubMed ID: 26447004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Virtual patients versus standardized patients for improving clinical reasoning skills in ophthalmology residents. A randomized controlled trial.
Malik TG; Mahboob U; Khan RA; Alam R
BMC Med Educ; 2024 Apr; 24(1):429. PubMed ID: 38649884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Twelve tips to support the development of clinical reasoning skills using virtual patient cases.
Posel N; Mcgee JB; Fleiszer DM
Med Teach; 2015; 37(9):813-8. PubMed ID: 25523009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The virtual-patient pilot: testing a new tool for undergraduate surgical education and assessment.
Yang RL; Hashimoto DA; Predina JD; Bowens NM; Sonnenberg EM; Cleveland EC; Lawson C; Morris JB; Kelz RR
J Surg Educ; 2013; 70(3):394-401. PubMed ID: 23618451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Do medical students respond empathetically to a virtual patient?
Deladisma AM; Cohen M; Stevens A; Wagner P; Lok B; Bernard T; Oxendine C; Schumacher L; Johnsen K; Dickerson R; Raij A; Wells R; Duerson M; Harper JG; Lind DS;
Am J Surg; 2007 Jun; 193(6):756-60. PubMed ID: 17512291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Language, culture and international exchange of virtual patients.
Muntean V; Calinici T; Tigan S; Fors UG
BMC Med Educ; 2013 Feb; 13():21. PubMed ID: 23394453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]