These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

303 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22854805)

  • 1. The World Health Organization Disability Assessment Scale, WHODAS II: reliability and validity in the measurement of activity and participation in a spinal cord injury population.
    Wolf AC; Tate RL; Lannin NA; Middleton J; Lane-Brown A; Cameron ID
    J Rehabil Med; 2012 Sep; 44(9):747-55. PubMed ID: 22854805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of the Utrecht Scale for Evaluation of Rehabilitation-Participation with the ICF Measure of Participation and Activities Screener and the WHO Disability Assessment Schedule II in persons with spinal cord injury.
    van der Zee CH; Post MW; Brinkhof MW; Wagenaar RC
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2014 Jan; 95(1):87-93. PubMed ID: 24008052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Validation of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule II (WHODAS-II) in patients with multiple sclerosis.
    Magistrale G; Pisani V; Argento O; Incerti CC; Bozzali M; Cadavid D; Caltagirone C; Medori R; DeLuca J; Nocentini U
    Mult Scler; 2015 Apr; 21(4):448-56. PubMed ID: 25092769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The reliability and validity of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS-II) in stroke.
    Küçükdeveci AA; Kutlay Ş; Yıldızlar D; Öztuna D; Elhan AH; Tennant A
    Disabil Rehabil; 2013 Feb; 35(3):214-20. PubMed ID: 22671861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparing the reliability of five participation instruments in persons with spinal conditions.
    Noonan VK; Kopec JA; Noreau L; Singer J; Mâsse LC; Dvorak MF
    J Rehabil Med; 2010 Sep; 42(8):735-43. PubMed ID: 20809055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. World Health Organisation Disability Assessment Schedule II: contribution to the Italian validation.
    Federici S; Meloni F; Mancini A; Lauriola M; Olivetti Belardinelli M
    Disabil Rehabil; 2009; 31(7):553-64. PubMed ID: 19191060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The clinimetric properties of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule II in early inflammatory arthritis.
    Baron M; Schieir O; Hudson M; Steele R; Kolahi S; Berkson L; Couture F; Fitzcharles MA; Gagné M; Garfield B; Gutkowski A; Kang H; Kapusta M; Ligier S; Mathieu JP; Ménard H; Starr M; Stein M; Zummer M
    Arthritis Rheum; 2008 Mar; 59(3):382-90. PubMed ID: 18311751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparing the validity of five participation instruments in persons with spinal conditions.
    Noonan VK; Kopec JA; Noreau L; Singer J; Mâsse LC; Zhang H; Dvorak MF
    J Rehabil Med; 2010 Sep; 42(8):724-34. PubMed ID: 20809054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Validation of the World Health Organization Assessment Schedule II Chinese Traditional Version (WHODAS II CT) in persons with disabilities and chronic illnesses for Chinese population.
    Cheung MK; Hung AT; Poon PK; Fong DY; Li LS; Chow ES; Qiu ZY; Liou TH
    Disabil Rehabil; 2015; 37(20):1902-7. PubMed ID: 25495681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Validity of the 12-item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) in individuals with Huntington disease (HD).
    Carlozzi NE; Kratz AL; Downing NR; Goodnight S; Miner JA; Migliore N; Paulsen JS
    Qual Life Res; 2015 Aug; 24(8):1963-71. PubMed ID: 25636661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Psychometric properties of the world health organization disability assessment schedule II -12 Item (WHODAS II) in trauma patients.
    Abedzadeh-Kalahroudi M; Razi E; Sehat M; Asadi-Lari M
    Injury; 2016 May; 47(5):1104-8. PubMed ID: 26710706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Measuring functional health among the elderly: development of the Japanese version of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule II.
    Tazaki M; Yamaguchi T; Yatsunami M; Nakane Y
    Int J Rehabil Res; 2014 Mar; 37(1):48-53. PubMed ID: 24051962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Development of traditional Chinese version of World Health Organization disability assessment schedule 2.0 36--item (WHODAS 2.0) in Taiwan: validity and reliability analyses.
    Chiu TY; Yen CF; Chou CH; Lin JD; Hwang AW; Liao HF; Chi WC
    Res Dev Disabil; 2014 Nov; 35(11):2812-20. PubMed ID: 25094056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cross-cultural adaptation of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) for Hebrew-speaking subjects with and without hand injury.
    Marom BS; Carel RS; Sharabi M; Ratzon NZ
    Disabil Rehabil; 2017 Jun; 39(12):1155-1161. PubMed ID: 27291062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Disability in bipolar I disorder: the 36-item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0.
    Guilera G; Gómez-Benito J; Pino Ó; Rojo E; Vieta E; Cuesta MJ; Purdon SE; Bernardo M; Crespo-Facorro B; Franco M; Martínez-Arán A; Safont G; Tabarés-Seisdedos R; Rejas J;
    J Affect Disord; 2015 Mar; 174():353-60. PubMed ID: 25553398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Feasibility, reliability, and validity of the Japanese version of the 12-item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule-2 in preoperative patients.
    Ida M; Naito Y; Tanaka Y; Matsunari Y; Inoue S; Kawaguchi M
    J Anesth; 2017 Aug; 31(4):539-544. PubMed ID: 28378206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. WHODAS II with people after stroke and their relatives.
    Schlote A; Richter M; Wunderlich MT; Poppendick U; Möller C; Schwelm K; Wallesch CW
    Disabil Rehabil; 2009; 31(11):855-64. PubMed ID: 19093276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Validity and reliability of the Functioning Disability Evaluation Scale-Adult Version based on the WHODAS 2.0--36 items.
    Yen CF; Hwang AW; Liou TH; Chiu TY; Hsu HY; Chi WC; Wu TF; Chang BS; Lu SJ; Liao HF; Teng SW; Chiu WT
    J Formos Med Assoc; 2014 Nov; 113(11):839-49. PubMed ID: 25294100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Development and validation of IMPACT-S, an ICF-based questionnaire to measure activities and participation.
    Post MW; de Witte LP; Reichrath E; Verdonschot MM; Wijlhuizen GJ; Perenboom RJ
    J Rehabil Med; 2008 Aug; 40(8):620-7. PubMed ID: 19020695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Psychometric evaluation of the WHODAS 2.0 and prevalence of disability in a Swedish general population.
    Norén P; Karlsson J; Ohlsson-Nevo E; Möller M; Hermansson L
    J Patient Rep Outcomes; 2023 Apr; 7(1):36. PubMed ID: 37020121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.