143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22854995)
1. Risk of injury to the superior gluteal nerve when using a proximal incision for insertion of a piriformis-entry reamed femoral intramedullary nail: a cadaveric study.
Lowe JA; Min W; Lee MA; Wolinsky PR
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2012 Aug; 94(15):1416-9. PubMed ID: 22854995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Risk of superior gluteal nerve and gluteus medius muscle injury during femoral nail insertion.
Ozsoy MH; Basarir K; Bayramoglu A; Erdemli B; Tuccar E; Eksioglu MF
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2007 Apr; 89(4):829-34. PubMed ID: 17403807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Soft tissue injury related to choice of entry point in antegrade femoral nailing: piriform fossa or greater trochanter tip.
Ansari Moein CM; Verhofstad MH; Bleys RL; van der Werken C
Injury; 2005 Nov; 36(11):1337-42. PubMed ID: 16137692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Risk of injury to the axillary nerve during antegrade proximal humeral blade nail fixation - an anatomical study.
Spiegelberg BG; Riley ND; Taylor GJ
Injury; 2014 Aug; 45(8):1185-9. PubMed ID: 24907010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A cadaveric biomechanical study comparing the ease of femoral nail insertion: 1.0- vs 1.5-m bow designs.
Yuan H; Acklin Y; Varga P; Gueorguiev B; Windolf M; Epari D; Schuetz M; Schmutz B
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2017 May; 137(5):663-671. PubMed ID: 28374092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The outcome of closed, intramedullary exchange nailing with reamed insertion in the treatment of femoral shaft nonunions.
Shroeder JE; Mosheiff R; Khoury A; Liebergall M; Weil YA
J Orthop Trauma; 2009 Oct; 23(9):653-7. PubMed ID: 19897987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Entry point soft tissue damage in antegrade femoral nailing: a cadaver study.
Dora C; Leunig M; Beck M; Rothenfluh D; Ganz R
J Orthop Trauma; 2001; 15(7):488-93. PubMed ID: 11602831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A Biomechanical Comparison of Trochanteric Versus Piriformis Reconstruction Nails for Femoral Neck Fracture Prophylaxis.
Shieh AK; Bravin DA; Shelton TJ; Garcia-Nolen TC; Lee MA; Eastman JG
J Orthop Trauma; 2021 Aug; 35(8):e293-e297. PubMed ID: 33252444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The effect of antegrade femoral nailing on femoral head perfusion: a comparison of piriformis fossa and trochanteric entry points.
Schottel PC; Hinds RM; Lazaro LE; Klinger C; Ni A; Dyke JP; Helfet DL; Lorich DG
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2015 Apr; 135(4):473-80. PubMed ID: 25708026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Lateral insertion points in antegrade femoral nailing and their influence on femoral bone strains.
Linke B; Ansari Moein C; Bösl O; Verhofstad MH; van der Werken C; Schwieger K; Ito K
J Orthop Trauma; 2008; 22(10):716-22. PubMed ID: 18978548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison study between reamed and unreamed nailing of closed femoral fractures.
Selvakumar K; Saw KY; Fathima M
Med J Malaysia; 2001 Dec; 56 Suppl D():24-8. PubMed ID: 14569762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Anatomic Structures at Risk When Utilizing an Intramedullary Nail for Distal Fibular Fractures: A Cadaveric Study.
Goss DA; Reb CW; Philbin TM
Foot Ankle Int; 2017 Aug; 38(8):916-920. PubMed ID: 28539054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Anatomy of the greater femoral trochanter: clinical importance for intramedullary femoral nailing. Anatomic study of 100 cadaver specimens.
Grechenig W; Pichler W; Clement H; Tesch NP; Grechenig S
Acta Orthop; 2006 Dec; 77(6):899-901. PubMed ID: 17260198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Intramedullary pressure and bone marrow fat extravasation in reamed and unreamed femoral nailing.
Kröpfl A; Davies J; Berger U; Hertz H; Schlag G
J Orthop Res; 1999 Mar; 17(2):261-8. PubMed ID: 10221844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A biomechanical comparison of unlocked or locked reamed intramedullary nails in the treatment of mid-third simple transverse femoral shaft fractures.
Wu CC; Tai CL
Chang Gung Med J; 2006; 29(3):275-82. PubMed ID: 16924889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The relationship of the Phantom® Lapidus Intramedullary Nail System to neurologic and tendinous structures in the foot: An anatomic study.
Shofoluwe A; Fowler B; Marques L; Stewart GW; Badana ANS
Foot Ankle Surg; 2021 Feb; 27(2):231-234. PubMed ID: 32546327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Avoidance of malreduction of proximal femoral shaft fractures with the use of a minimally invasive nail insertion technique (MINIT).
Russell TA; Mir HR; Stoneback J; Cohen J; Downs B
J Orthop Trauma; 2008 Jul; 22(6):391-8. PubMed ID: 18594303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Distal femoral fixation: a laboratory comparison of the 95 degrees plate, antegrade and retrograde inserted reamed intramedullary nails.
Koval KJ; Kummer FJ; Bharam S; Chen D; Halder S
J Orthop Trauma; 1996; 10(6):378-82. PubMed ID: 8854314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Muscle function and functional outcome following standard antegrade reamed intramedullary nailing of isolated femoral shaft fractures.
Helmy N; Jando VT; Lu T; Chan H; O'Brien PJ
J Orthop Trauma; 2008 Jan; 22(1):10-5. PubMed ID: 18176159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Anatomic structures at risk: curved hindfoot arthrodesis nail--a cadaveric approach.
Knight T; Rosenfeld P; Jones IT; Clark C; Savva N
J Foot Ankle Surg; 2014; 53(6):687-91. PubMed ID: 25176005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]