265 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22855077)
21. Efficacy of antiseptic-impregnated catheters on catheter colonization and catheter-related bloodstream infections in patients in an intensive care unit.
Osma S; Kahveci SF; Kaya FN; Akalin H; Ozakin C; Yilmaz E; Kutlay O
J Hosp Infect; 2006 Feb; 62(2):156-62. PubMed ID: 16307824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Effectiveness of stepwise interventions targeted to decrease central catheter-associated bloodstream infections.
Munoz-Price LS; Dezfulian C; Wyckoff M; Lenchus JD; Rosalsky M; Birnbach DJ; Arheart KL
Crit Care Med; 2012 May; 40(5):1464-9. PubMed ID: 22511128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Daily chlorohexidine gluconate bathing with impregnated cloths results in statistically significant reduction in central line-associated bloodstream infections.
Dixon JM; Carver RL
Am J Infect Control; 2010 Dec; 38(10):817-21. PubMed ID: 21093698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Chlorhexidine-Impregnated Dressings and Prevention of Catheter-Associated Bloodstream Infections in a Pediatric Intensive Care Unit.
Düzkaya DS; Sahiner NC; Uysal G; Yakut T; Çitak A
Crit Care Nurse; 2016 Dec; 36(6):e1-e7. PubMed ID: 27908954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Targeting zero catheter-related bloodstream infections in pediatric intensive care unit: a retrospective matched case-control study.
Biasucci DG; Pittiruti M; Taddei A; Picconi E; Pizza A; Celentano D; Piastra M; Scoppettuolo G; Conti G
J Vasc Access; 2018 Mar; 19(2):119-124. PubMed ID: 29148002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Effect of central line bundle on central line-associated bloodstream infections in intensive care units.
Jeong IS; Park SM; Lee JM; Song JY; Lee SJ
Am J Infect Control; 2013 Aug; 41(8):710-6. PubMed ID: 23394886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Comparison of chlorhexidine impregnated dressing and standard dressing for the prevention of central-line associated blood stream infection and colonization in critically ill pediatric patients: A randomized controlled trial.
Duyu M; Karakaya Z; Yazici P; Yavuz S; Yersel NM; Tascilar MO; Firat N; Bozkurt O; Caglar Mocan Y
Pediatr Int; 2022 Jan; 64(1):e15011. PubMed ID: 34610185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Economic impact of use of chlorhexidine-impregnated sponge dressing for prevention of central line-associated infections in the United States.
Ye X; Rupnow M; Bastide P; Lafuma A; Ovington L; Jarvis WR
Am J Infect Control; 2011 Oct; 39(8):647-654. PubMed ID: 21641681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Chlorhexidine-impregnated gel dressing compared with transparent polyurethane dressing in the prevention of catheter-related infections in critically ill adult patients: A pilot randomised controlled trial.
Margatho AS; Ciol MA; Hoffman JM; Dos Reis PED; Furuya RK; Lima DAFS; Basile-Filho A; Silveira RCCP
Aust Crit Care; 2019 Nov; 32(6):471-478. PubMed ID: 30558968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Cost-effectiveness analysis of chlorhexidine gluconate compared with povidone-iodine solution for catheter-site care in Siriraj Hospital, Thailand.
Maenthaisong R; Chaiyakunapruk N; Thamlikitkul V
J Med Assoc Thai; 2006 Nov; 89 Suppl 5():S94-101. PubMed ID: 17718250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Is 2% chlorhexidine gluconate in 70% isopropyl alcohol more effective at preventing central venous catheter-related infections than routinely used chlorhexidine gluconate solutions: A pilot multicenter randomized trial (ISRCTN2657745)?
McCann M; Fitzpatrick F; Mellotte G; Clarke M
Am J Infect Control; 2016 Aug; 44(8):948-9. PubMed ID: 27079247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. [Prevention and nursing care of central line-associated bloodstream infections in critically ill patients].
Lu SF; Chen JH; Shang WM; Chou SS
Hu Li Za Zhi; 2012 Aug; 59(4):5-11. PubMed ID: 22851388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. A multimodal approach to central venous catheter hub care can decrease catheter-related bloodstream infection.
Sannoh S; Clones B; Munoz J; Montecalvo M; Parvez B
Am J Infect Control; 2010 Aug; 38(6):424-9. PubMed ID: 20137829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Clinical experiences of using Biopatch: a chlorhexidine gluconate-impregnated sponge dressing. Case study 2: paediatric intensive care.
Franklin N
Br J Nurs; 2014; 23(14 Suppl):S21. PubMed ID: 25373254
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Infection rates associated with total parenteral nutrition.
Madeo M; Lowry L
J Hosp Infect; 2011 Dec; 79(4):373-4. PubMed ID: 21958684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. [Care of the non-tunneled central venous catheter. Literature search on disinfectants, dressings and intervals between dressing changes].
Ausserhofer D; Fritz E; Them C
Pflege Z; 2008 Aug; 61(8):457-62. PubMed ID: 18705182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Chlorhexidine-impregnated sponge versus chlorhexidine gel dressing for short-term intravascular catheters: which one is better?
Buetti N; Ruckly S; Schwebel C; Mimoz O; Souweine B; Lucet JC; Timsit JF
Crit Care; 2020 Jul; 24(1):458. PubMed ID: 32703235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Antimicrobial activity of a chlorhexidine intravascular catheter site gel dressing.
Karpanen TJ; Casey AL; Conway BR; Lambert PA; Elliott TS
J Antimicrob Chemother; 2011 Aug; 66(8):1777-84. PubMed ID: 21609979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Chlorhexidine-impregnated dressing for prevention of colonization of central venous catheters in infants and children: a randomized controlled study.
Levy I; Katz J; Solter E; Samra Z; Vidne B; Birk E; Ashkenazi S; Dagan O
Pediatr Infect Dis J; 2005 Aug; 24(8):676-9. PubMed ID: 16094219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Clinical experiences of using Biopatch: a chlorhexidine gluconate-impregnated sponge dressing. Case study 1: renal setting.
Nicholls M
Br J Nurs; 2014; 23(14 Suppl):S20-1. PubMed ID: 25373253
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
