BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

213 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22855354)

  • 1. Two-stage dose finding for cytostatic agents in phase I oncology trials.
    Yin G; Zheng S; Xu J
    Stat Med; 2013 Feb; 32(4):644-60. PubMed ID: 22855354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Beyond the 3+3 method: expanded algorithms for dose- escalation in Phase I oncology trials of two agents.
    Braun TM; Alonzo TA
    Clin Trials; 2011 Jun; 8(3):247-59. PubMed ID: 21730075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An adaptive dose-finding approach for correlated bivariate binary and continuous outcomes in phase I oncology trials.
    Hirakawa A
    Stat Med; 2012 Mar; 31(6):516-32. PubMed ID: 22108785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Phase I/II dose-finding design for molecularly targeted agent: Plateau determination using adaptive randomization.
    Riviere MK; Yuan Y; Jourdan JH; Dubois F; Zohar S
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2018 Feb; 27(2):466-479. PubMed ID: 26988926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Fractional dose-finding methods with late-onset toxicity in phase I clinical trials.
    Yin G; Zheng S; Xu J
    J Biopharm Stat; 2013; 23(4):856-70. PubMed ID: 23786314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A two-dimensional search algorithm for dose-finding trials of two agents.
    Lee BL; Fan SK
    J Biopharm Stat; 2012; 22(4):802-18. PubMed ID: 22651116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Toxicity-evaluation designs for phase I/II cancer immunotherapy trials.
    Messer K; Natarajan L; Ball ED; Lane TA
    Stat Med; 2010 Mar; 29(7-8):712-20. PubMed ID: 20213706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Design issues in dose-finding Phase I trials for combinations of two agents.
    Fan SK; Venook AP; Lu Y
    J Biopharm Stat; 2009; 19(3):509-23. PubMed ID: 19384692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Bayesian dose-finding designs for combination of molecularly targeted agents assuming partial stochastic ordering.
    Guo B; Li Y
    Stat Med; 2015 Feb; 34(5):859-75. PubMed ID: 25413162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dose finding with continuous outcome in phase I oncology trials.
    Wang Y; Ivanova A
    Pharm Stat; 2015; 14(2):102-7. PubMed ID: 25408518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An adaptive dose-finding design incorporating both toxicity and efficacy.
    Zhang W; Sargent DJ; Mandrekar S
    Stat Med; 2006 Jul; 25(14):2365-83. PubMed ID: 16220478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Three-dose-cohort designs in cancer phase I trials.
    Huang B; Chappell R
    Stat Med; 2008 May; 27(12):2070-93. PubMed ID: 17764082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Towards using a full spectrum of early clinical trial data: a retrospective analysis to compare potential longitudinal categorical models for molecular targeted therapies in oncology.
    Colin P; Micallef S; Delattre M; Mancini P; Parent E
    Stat Med; 2015 Sep; 34(22):2999-3016. PubMed ID: 26059319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Two-stage approach based on zone and dose findings for two-agent combination Phase I/II trials.
    Shimamura F; Hamada C; Matsui S; Hirakawa A
    J Biopharm Stat; 2018; 28(6):1025-1037. PubMed ID: 29420127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A utility-based Bayesian optimal interval (U-BOIN) phase I/II design to identify the optimal biological dose for targeted and immune therapies.
    Zhou Y; Lee JJ; Yuan Y
    Stat Med; 2019 Dec; 38(28):5299-5316. PubMed ID: 31621952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Phase I studies of chemotherapeutic agents in cancer patients: a review of the designs.
    Potter DM
    J Biopharm Stat; 2006; 16(5):579-604. PubMed ID: 17037260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Early phase trial design for assessing several dose levels for toxicity and efficacy for targeted agents.
    Hoering A; Mitchell A; LeBlanc M; Crowley J
    Clin Trials; 2013; 10(3):422-9. PubMed ID: 23529697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Designs for phase I trials in ordered groups.
    Conaway MR; Wages NA
    Stat Med; 2017 Jan; 36(2):254-265. PubMed ID: 27624880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Seamless Phase I/II Adaptive Design for Oncology Trials of Molecularly Targeted Agents.
    Wages NA; Tait C
    J Biopharm Stat; 2015; 25(5):903-20. PubMed ID: 24904956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Designs for single- or multiple-agent phase I trials.
    Conaway MR; Dunbar S; Peddada SD
    Biometrics; 2004 Sep; 60(3):661-9. PubMed ID: 15339288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.